鼻内镜下探查止血术与前后鼻孔填塞术的比较分析
A Comparative Analysis of Endoscopic Exploration Hemostasis and Anterior & Posterior Nasal Packing Surgery
DOI: 10.12677/ACRO.2013.12006, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 3,055  浏览: 11,033 
作者: 李雅英*, 刘文霞, 王荣霞, 励印松:衡水市第二人民医院耳鼻喉科,衡水
关键词: 鼻内镜探查止血填塞术Nasal Endoscope; Exploration and Hemostasis; Tamponade Operation
摘要: 探讨鼻内镜下探查止血术与前后鼻孔填塞术在鼻出血患者治疗中的优缺点。对317例鼻出血患者进行对比,其中281例行鼻内镜下探查止血术,36例行前后鼻孔填塞术。文中对不同原因、不同年龄、不同部位以及出血量不同所采取的治疗方法进行了比较分析,认为在彻底止血的基础上,合理而有计划的选择鼻内镜下探查止血术,为患者解除前后鼻孔填塞所带来的痛苦不失为最佳的选择。
Abstract: The article evaluates the advantages and disadvantages in endoscopic exploration hemostasis and anterior & posterior nasal tamponade in the treatment of patients with nasal bleeding. 317 cases of nasal hemorrhage were ana-lysed, including 281 cases of nasal endoscopic exploration hemostasis, 36 cases of anterior and posterior nasal packing. After comparing the treatment methods from different reasons, different ages, different positions and different amount of bleeding, the author argue that, based on the thorough hemostasis firstly, to utilize endoscopic exploration hemostasis reasonably so as to relieve the pain of anterior and posterior nasal packing is the best choice.
文章引用:李雅英, 刘文霞, 王荣霞, 励印松. 鼻内镜下探查止血术与前后鼻孔填塞术的比较分析[J]. 亚洲耳鼻咽喉科病例研究, 2013, 1(2): 19-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/ACRO.2013.12006

参考文献

[1] 黄选兆. 耳鼻咽喉科学(第4版)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1995: 20.
[2] L. H. Wurman, J. G. Sack, J. V. Flannery, et al. Selective endoscopic electro cautery for posterior epistxis. Larynscope, 1998, 98: 1348-1349.
[3] 冯春英, 刘明, 柯朝阳等. 鼻内窥镜下双极电凝治疗难治性鼻出血[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2006, 26(6): 837.
[4] 丁海峰, 张孝文, 刘维荣等. 鼻窦内窥镜下探明鼻出血部位及其临床应用价值[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉杂志, 2001, 3: 199.
[5] B. Jordan, D. David and R. William. Endoscopic ligation of the internal maxillary artery for treatment of intractable posterior epistaxis. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 1998, 107: 852-911.
[6] 罗安手, 陈英茄. 鼻腔填塞诱发肺性脑病[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 2005, 19(5): 214-234.
[7] 许庚, 史剑波. 功能性内镜鼻窦手术的核心技术[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2009, 44(7): 529-530.