ACPP  >> Vol. 5 No. 2 (June 2016)

    康德的“智性直观”与牟宗三的“智的直觉”—认识论与存有论两种理论视域下的道德哲学
    Kant’s “die intellektuelle Anschauung” and Mou Zongsan’s “the Intellectual Intuition”—The Moral Philosophy in the Views of Epistemology and Ontology

  • 全文下载: PDF(365KB) HTML   XML   PP.23-29   DOI: 10.12677/ACPP.2016.52004  
  • 下载量: 355  浏览量: 1,379   国家科技经费支持

作者:  

胡 磊:吉林大学哲学系,吉林 长春

关键词:
智性直观认识论智的直觉存有论Die intellektuelle Anschauung Epistemology The Intellectual Intuition Ontology

摘要:

康德根据人之有限性提出人没有“智性直观”,牟宗三则以“人虽有限而无限”为依据,提出人有“智的直觉”;康德的理论立场是认识论的,牟宗三则是存有论的。在这种理论立场的转化中,牟宗三对康德的理论产生了一定误解,从牟宗三的视角来看,这同时也是一种立足于中国哲学传统,并借鉴康德哲学理论的再创造:将理论根基由“理性”转为“生命”;将建构方法由“逻辑分析”转为“践仁尽性”。

Kant puts forward that human beings don’t have “die intellektuelle Anschauung”, according to the limitations of humans. While Mou Zongsan holds that human beings have “the intellectual intuition”, according to that humans can be unlimited in a sense despite their limitations. The theoretical standpoint of Kant is epistemology, and that of Mou Zongsan is ontology. In the transformation of theoretical standpoint, there are misunderstandings in Mou Zongsan’s interpretations of Kant’s “die intellektuelle Anschauung”. However, we can also say that Mou Zongsan has made a philosophical creation based on the Chinese philosophical tradition and, at the same time, he drew lessons from Kant’s philosophical theory: as to the theoretical foundation, transforming “Reason” to “Life”, and as to the way to present his theory, transforming “logic analysis” to “Jianren-Jinxing”.

文章引用:
胡磊. 康德的“智性直观”与牟宗三的“智的直觉”—认识论与存有论两种理论视域下的道德哲学[J]. 哲学进展, 2016, 5(2): 23-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/ACPP.2016.52004

参考文献

[1] 牟宗三. 智的直觉与中国哲学[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2008.
[2] 康德. 纯粹理性批判[M]. 邓晓芒, 译, 杨祖陶, 校. 北京: 人民出版社, 2004.
[3] 邓晓芒. 牟宗三对康德之误读举要——关于“智性直观”(上) [J]. 江苏行政学院学报, 2006(1): 14-20.
[4] Bunnin, N. (2013) God’s Knowledge and Ours: Kant and Mou Zongsan on Intellectual Intuition. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 40, 47-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-6253.12065
[5] 康德. 道德形而上学奠基[M]. 杨云飞, 译, 邓晓芒, 校. 北京: 人民出版社, 2013.
[6] 牟宗三. 圆善论[M]. 长春: 吉林出版集团有限责任公司, 2010.
[7] 牟宗三. 现象与物自身[M]. 长春: 吉林出版集团有限责任公司, 2010.
[8] 牟宗三. 心体与性体(上) [M]. 长春: 吉林出版集团有限责任公司, 2013.
[9] Vos, R. (Stephen, R., Ed.) (2010) Doing Good or Right? Kant’s Critique on Confucious, in Cultivating Personhood: Kant and Asian Philosophy. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Palmquist, Berlin/New York.
[10] 康德. 实践理性批判[M]. 邓晓芒, 译, 杨祖陶, 校. 北京: 人民出版社, 2003.