中国MBA商业伦理教育的RMV范式构建研究
Research on RMV Education Mode of MBA Business Ethics in China
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2011.11008, PDF, HTML, 下载: 4,012  浏览: 9,266  国家科技经费支持
作者: 张长征*：西安理工大学经济与管理学院；赵西萍：西安交通大学管理学院
关键词: 商业伦理；教育模式；MBA；RMV范式
Business Ethics; Education Mode; MBA Education; RMV Mode
摘要: 基于我国MBA商业伦理教育现状的分析，提出并阐述了MBA商业伦理教育的RMV范式。该范式中，商业伦理教育分为三个层次，分别为责任伦理层次（R，Responsibility）、道德伦理层次（M，Moral）和价值伦理层次（V，Value），并给出各层次商业伦理教育所应该匹配的不同教学手段与教学内容。其中，责任伦理层次教育致力于构建基于外部压力的伦理行为的动力机制，道德伦理层次教育致力于构建基于利益驱动的伦理行为的动力机制，而价值伦理层次教育则致力于构建基于内在追求的伦理行为的动力机制。在每一层次的商业伦理教育中，为MBA学员提供解决实际伦理困境的伦理决策技能与工具都是关键。
Abstract: Based on the analysis of the status quo of MBA business ethics education in China, the paper proposes the RMV Mode of MBA business ethics education. The modes proposes that there are three levels of teaching of business ethics education, respectively responsibility (R) level, moral (M) level and value (V) level, and proposes different teaching methods and teaching contents for each level. Of which, R level constructs the driving mechanism of behavior based on the external pressure of the MBA students, M level constructs the driving mechanism of behavior based on the benefits seeking motivation of the MBA students, and V level constructs the driving mechanism of behavior based on the internal value seeking motivation of the MBA stu-dents. In each level, it is critical for the business ethics education to provide the MBA students with the ethical decision-making skills and tools for resolving the practical ethical dilemmas.
文章引用：张长征, 赵西萍. 中国MBA商业伦理教育的RMV范式构建研究[J]. 教育进展, 2011, 1(1): 40-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/ae.2011.11008

参考文献

[1] Steiner, F. John. A practical guide to ethics in business. Business and Society Review, 1976, (Spring): 43-50.
[2] Carroll, B. Archie. Business and society: Managing corporate social performance. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1981.
[3] 陈炳富, 周祖城. 企业伦理学论纲[J]. 南开管理评论, 1997, 6(4): 24-28.
[4] 吴晓娟. 浅析我国MBA商业伦理教育[J]. 天津市财贸管理干部学院学报, 2010, 12(2): 48-49.
[5] 周祖成. 面向现实问题的MBA企业伦理学教学[J]. 学位与研究生教育. 2007, 24(4): 39-43.
[6] 戚安邦, 姜卉. 我国MBA商业伦理教育普及性分析及对策研究[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2007, 24(10): 8-12.
[7] Joseph Solberg, Kelly C. Strong and Charles McGuier. Living (not learning) ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 1995, 14(1): 71-81.
[8] 吴红梅. 美国商业伦理教育的实践及其对中国的启示[J]. 高教论坛, 2011, 27(2): 127-129.
[9] 戚安邦, 徐国振, 姜卉等. 我国MBA商业伦理和职业道德教育内容的实证研究[J]. 内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2007, 20(3): 59-62.
[10] 邬勇. 美国商学院的商业伦理教育及启示[J]. 江苏商论, 2005, 22(4): 32-33.
[11] D. C. Menzel. Teaching ethics and values in public administration: Are we making a difference?. Public Administration Review, 1997, 57(3): 224-230.
[12] Lori Chordas. Code of ethics. Best's Review, 2001, 101(13): 47-49.
[13] L. Kohlberg. Moral stage and moralization, in R. Lickona(ed) Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Re-search and Issues. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1976.
[14] 段文. 国外企业社会责任研究述评[J]. 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 9(3): 49-55.
[15] 邵明毅, 杜长智. 略谈案例教学的特色[J]. 成人高教学刊, 1996, 14(5): 32-36.
[16] 李传俊, 李本富. 医学伦理学教学案例教学的实践与评价[J]. 医学教育, 1995, 15(2): 9-13.
[17] 周祖成. 面向现实问题的MBA企业伦理学教学[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2007, 24(4): 39-43.
[18] C. Verschoor. Can an ethics code change behavior. Strategic Finance, 2000, 82(1): 26-38.
[19] B. A. Spencer, G. S. Taylor. A within and between analysis of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Akron Business and Economic Review, 1987, 18(3): 7-18.
[20] J. F. Posnikoff. Divestment from South Africa: They did well by doing good. Contemporary Economic Policy, 1997, 15(1): 33-46.
[21] P. E. Murphy, G. R. Laczniak. Traditional ethical issues facing marketing researchers. Marketing Research, Chicago, 1992, 4(1): 8-22.

为你推荐