年龄与风险决策中框架效应间关系及其机制探析
Age-Related Influence for Framing Effect in the Risky Decision-Making Tasks
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2013.35037, PDF, HTML,  被引量 下载: 3,188  浏览: 10,794  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 刘涵慧：中国青年政治学院青少年工作系
关键词: 年龄；风险决策；框架效应；认知加工风格；信息加工双通路说；Age; Risky Decision-Making; Framing Effect; Cognitive Processing Style; Dual Information Processes
摘要: 风险决策中的框架效应是决策研究的重要部分，不同年龄段的框架效应可能有显著差异。目前年龄与风险决策中框架效应关系的实证研究主要有三类观点：一是年龄与框架效应无关，二是框架效应随年龄增长而增大，三是随年龄增长，个体决策表现出从双向框架效应向单向框架效应的转变。本文从神经基础、认知加工风格以及信息加工双通路说及其对前景理论的修正等三个视角解读了年龄与框架效应之间的复杂关系，并认为，随年龄增长，个体加工情绪情感类(尤其是积极情绪情感类)信息能力的增强可能是导致框架效应随年龄变化的重要原因。
Abstract: Studies of framing effect in risky decision-making played an important role in rational deci- sion-making. There might be significant age-related changes of framing effects. Previous studies mainly had three findings: first of all, participants with different ages showed little differences in framing effect; Next, framing effect became larger with the increasing age; Finally, participants’ decision shifted from bidirectional to unidirectional framing effect with age increased. We reviewed the complicated relationships between framing effect and age, under the construct of neural correlates, cognitive processing style, dual information processes and the modified prospect theory; Moreover, we supposed that the increasing advantage of proc- essing emotional information, especially positive emotion might be the key reason of age-related changes in framing effect.
文章引用：刘涵慧 (2013). 年龄与风险决策中框架效应间关系及其机制探析. 心理学进展, 3(5), 238-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2013.35037

参考文献

[1] 段锦云, 曹忠良, 娄玮瑜(2008). 框架效应及其认知机制的研究进展. 应用心理学, 4期, 378-384.
[2] 高利苹, 李纾, 时勘(2006). 从对框架效应的分析看风险决策的神经基础. 心理科学进展, 6期, 859-865.
[3] 刘涵慧, 周洪雨, 车宏生(2008). 时间压力、个人相关性对不同类型框架下决策的影响. 心理学探新, 4期, 27-30.
[4] 孙彦, 李纾, 殷晓莉(2007). 决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统. 心理科学进展, 5期, 721-845.
[5] 文桂婵, 徐富明, 于会会, 黄宝珍, 王岚(2011). 特征框架效应的心理机制与影响因素. 心理科学进展, 12期, 1822-1833.
[6] 于会会, 徐富明, 黄宝珍, 文桂婵, 王岚(2012). 框架效应中的个体差异. 心理科学进展, 6期, 894-901.
[7] 张凤华, 曾建敏, 张庆林(2010). 框架效应, 情感的启发式. 心理科学, 6期, 1375-1380.
[8] Charles, S. T., Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2003). Aging and emotional memory. The forgettable nature of negative images for older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 132, 310-324.
[9] Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2012). Explaining adult age differences in decision-making competence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 325-360.
[10] Finucane, M. L. (2008). Emotion, affect, and risk communication with older adults, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Risk Research, 11, 983-997.
[11] Gachter, S., Orzen, H., Renner, E., & Starmer, C. (2009). Are experimental economists prone to framing effects? A natural field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70, 443-446.
[12] Gamliel, E., & Herstein, R. (2013). Involvement moderates the effect of message framing on consumers’ perceived monetary gain and product choice. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22, 142- 152.
[13] Harinck, F., Van Dijk, E., Van Bees, I., & Mersmann, P. (2007). When gains loom larger than losses, reversed loss aversion for small amounts of money. Psychological Science, 18, 1099-1105.
[14] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory. An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
[15] Kim, S., Goldstein. D., Hasher. L., & Zacks, R. T.(2005). Framing effects in younger and older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 60, 215-218.
[16] Larkin, G. R. S., Gibbs, S. E. B., Khanna, K., Nielsen, L., Carstensen, L. L., & Knutson, B. (2007). Anticipation of monetary gain but not loss in healthy older adults. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 787-791.
[17] Levin, I. P, & Hart, S. S. (2003). Risk preferences in young children, early evidence of individual differences in reaction to potential gains and losses. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 397-413.
[18] Levin, I. P., Hart, S. S., Weller, J. A., & Harshman, L. A. (2007a). Stability of choices in a risky decision-making task. A 3-year longitudinal study with children and adults. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20, 241-252.
[19] Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal, typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 149-188.
[20] Levin, I. P, Weller, J. A., Pederson, A. A., & Harshman, L. A. (2007b). Age-related differences in adaptive decision making sensitivity to expected value in risky choice. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 225-233.
[21] Martino, B. D., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313, 684-687.
[22] Mata, R., Josef, A. K., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Age differences in risky choice, a meta-analysis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235, 18-29.
[23] Mayhorn, C. B., & Fisk, A. D. & Whittle, J. D. (2002). Decisions, decisions, analysis of age, cohort, and time of testing on framing of risky decision options. Human Factors, 44, 515-521.
[24] McElroy, T., & Seta, J. J. (2003). Framing effects, an analytic-holistic perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 610- 617.
[25] Mikels, J. A., Lockenhoff, C. E., Maglio, S. J., Carstensen, L. L., Goldstein, M. K., & Garber, A. (2010). Following your heart or your head, focusing on emotions versus information differentially influences the decisions of younger and older adults. Journal of Experi- mental Psychology, Applied, 16, 87-95.
[26] Mikels, J. A., & Reed, A. E. (2009). Monetary losses do not loom large in later life, age differences in the framing effect. Journal of Geron- tology, Psychological Sciences, 64, 457-460.
[27] Payne, J. W., Sagara, N., Shu, S. B., Appelt, K. C., & Johnson, E. J. (2013). Life expectancy as a constructed belief: Evidence of a live-to or die-by framing effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 46, 27-50.
[28] Peters, E., Hess, T. M., Vastfjall, D., & Auman, C. (2007). Adult age differences in dual information processes implications for the role of affective and deliberative processes in older adults decision making. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 1-23.
[29] Peters, E., Diefenbach, M. A., Hess, T. M., & Vastfjall, D. (2008). Age differences in dual informa-tion-processing modes-implication for cancer decision making, Cancer, 113, 3556-3567.
[30] Ronnlund, M., Karlsson, E., Laggnas, E., Larsson, L. & Lindstrom, T. (2005). Risky decision making across three arenas of choice, are younger and older adults differently susceptible to framing effects? The Journal of General Psychology, 132, 81-92.
[31] Schlottmann, A., & Tring, J. (2005). How children reason about gains and losses, framing effects in judgment and choice. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64, 153-171.
[32] Spaniol, J., Voss, A., & Grady, C. L. (2008). Aging and emotional memory, cognitive mechanisms underlying the positivity effect. Psychology and Aging, 23, 859-872.
[33] Thomas, A. K., & Millar, P. R. (2012). Reducing the framing effect in older and younger adults by encouraging analytic processing. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 67, 139-149.
[34] Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice. Science, 221, 453-458.
[35] Wang, X. T. (1996c). Framing effects, dynamics and task domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processed, 68, 145- 157.
[36] Weller, J. A., Levin, I. P., & Denburg, N. L. (2011). Trajectory of risky decision making for potential gains and losses from age 5 to 85. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24, 331-344.
[37] Weller, J. A., Levin, I. P., Shiv, B., & Bechara, A. (2007). Neural cor- relates of adaptive decision making for risky gains and losses. Psy- chological Sciences, 18, 958-964.