手机通话对驾驶行为影响的实验范式综述
The Impact of the Phone Talking on Driving: A Review of the Experimental Paradigms
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2013.36045, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 2,824  浏览: 9,407 
作者: 芮梦霞：南通大学航海医学研究所，南通；王纪妹：南通大学教育科学学院，南通
关键词: 驾驶行为；手机通话；实验研究范式；Driving; Mobile Phoning; Experimental Paradigms
摘要: 人们很长时间以来关注通电话为什么会对驾驶行为产生不利影响。目前，一些研究者对此类问题的研究重点已经从驾驶过程中使用何种类型的手机转向具体通话内容对驾驶的影响。研究表明通话任务的内容本质才是影响驾驶行为的关键。然而，人们会根据驾驶的具体情况，有意识地采取分配策略以避免危险事件的发生；而且不同驾驶经验的人对待这两个任务的操作方式也有所不同。文章将结合次任务的不同类型，介绍跟车任务范式、视觉搜索任务范式、改变任务范式和练习任务范式在研究中的应用，展望该领域的研究新方向。
Abstract:  People have concerned about why the mobile phoning distracted attention from driving in a long time. Currently, some researchers have shifted their interest from the effect of phone type to the specific conversations on driving. Studies showed that the nature of the conversation was the key to distracted driving. However, Studies also showed that according to the specific driving situation, people would consciously adopt allocation strategy to avoid dangerous incidents. Moreover, people with different driving experience operated the two tasks in different ways. In this paper, four kinds of experimental paradigms combined with different types of secondary tasks, car task, visual search task, change task and practice task were summarized. That will help us to find the new directions in this field.
文章引用：芮梦霞, 王纪妹 (2013). 手机通话对驾驶行为影响的实验范式综述. 心理学进展, 3(6), 298-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2013.36045

参考文献

[1] 施臻彦, 葛列众, 胡晓晴(2010). 驾驶分心行为的测量方法及其应用研究进展. 人类工效学, 3期, 70-74.
[2] Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. (1995). The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 27, 707-715.
[3] Atchley, P., & Chan, M. (2011). Potential benefits and costs of concurrent task engagement to maintain vigilance: A driving simulator investigation. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53, 3-12.
[4] Atchley, P., Dressel, J., Jones, T. C., Burson, R. A., & Marshall, D. (2011). Talking and driving: Applications of crossmodal action reveal a special role for spatial language. Psychological Research, 75, 525-534.
[5] Bergen, B., Medeiros-Ward, N., Wheeler, K., Drews, F., & Strayer, D. (2013). The crosstalk hypothesis: Why language interferes with driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 119- 130.
[6] Brookhuis, K. A., De Vries, G., & De Waard, D. (1991). The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23, 309-316.
[7] Brown, I. D., Tickner, A. H. & Simmonds, D. C. V. (1969). Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 419-424
[8] Brumby, D. P., Salvucci, D. D., & Howes, A. (2007). An empirical investigation into dual-task trade-offs while driving and dialing. Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI... but Not as We Know It-Volume 2 (pp. 11-14). British Computer Society.
[9] Cnossen, F., Rothengatter, T., & Meijman, T. (2000). Strategic changes in task performance in simulated car driving as an adaptive response to task demands. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 3, 123-140.
[10] Drews, F. A., Pasupathi, M., & Strayer, D. L. (2008). Passenger and cell phone conversation during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 392-400.
[11] Emberson, L. L., Lupyan, G., Goldstein, M. H., & Spivey, M. J. (2010). Overheard cell-phone conversations when less speech is more distracting. Psychological Science, 21, 1383-1388.
[12] Graham, R., & Carter, C. (2001). Voice dialling can reduce the interference between concurrent tasks of driving and phoning. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 26, 30-47.
[13] Hancock, P. A., Simmons, L., Hashemi, L., Howarth, H., & Ranney, T. (1999). The effects of in-vehicle distraction on driver response during a crucial driving maneuver. Transportation Human Factors, 1, 295-309.
[14] Harbluk, J. L., Eisenman, M., & Noy, Y. I. (2002). The impact of cognitive distraction on driver visual behaviour and vehicle control (No. TP# 13889 E). Transport Canada.
[15] Iqbal, S. T., Ju, Y. C., & Horvitz, E. (2010). Cars, calls, and cognition: Investigating driving and divided attention. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1281-1290). ACM.
[16] Janssen, C. P., & Brumby, D. P. (2010). Strategic adaptation to performance objectives in a dual-task setting. Cognitive Science, 34, 1548-1560.
[17] Kubose, T. T., Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Garnsey, S. M., Kramer, A. F., & Mayhugh, J. (2006). The effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 43-63.
[18] Kunar, M. A., Carter, R., Cohen, M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2008). Telephone conversation impairs sustained visual attention via a central bottleneck. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1135-1140.
[19] Laberge-Nadeau, C., Maag, U., Bellavance, F., Lapierre, S. D., Desjardins, D., Messier, S., & Saidi, A. (2003). Wireless telephones and the risk of road crashes. Accident Analysis Prevention, 35, 649- 660.
[20] Lamble, D., Kauranen, T., Laakso, M., & Summala, H. (1999). Cog- nitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: Safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 31, 617-623.
[21] Levy, J., & Pashler, H. (2008). Task prioritisation in multitasking during driving: Opportunity to abort a concurrent task does not insulate braking responses from dual-task slowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 507-525.
[22] Lightman, E. (2010). Practice effects, emotion, and mechanisms of dual-task interference in driving and cell phone research. Master’s Dissertation, Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
[23] McCarley, J. S., Vais, M. J., Pringle, H., Kramer, A. F., Irwin, D. E., & Strayer, D. L. (2004). Conversation disrupts change detection in complex traffic scenes. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46, 424-436.
[24] McEvoy, S. P., Stevenson, M. R., McCartt, A. T., Woodward, M., Haworth, C., Palamara, P., & Cercarelli, R. (2005). Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: A casecrossover study. British Medical Journal, 331, 428-433.
[25] McKeown, D., & Isherwood, S. (2007). Mapping candidate within- vehicle auditory displays to their referents .Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 49, 417-428.
[26] McKnight, A. J., & McKnight, A. S. (1993). The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 25, 259-265.
[27] Metz, B., & Krüger, H. P. (2011). Distribution of visual attention dur- ing distraction: Influence of demands of the driving task and of the secondary task. 2nd International Confe-rence on Driver Distraction and Inattention, Gothenburg, 5-7 September 2011.
[28] Patrick, R. E., & Elias, L. J. (2009). Navigational conversation impairs concurrent distance judgments. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41, 36-41.
[29] Patten, C. J., Kircher, A., Östlund, J., & Nilsson, L. (2004). Using mobile telephones: Cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36, 341-350.
[30] Pavan, A., & Baggio, G. (2013). Linguistic representations of motion do not depend on the visual motion system. Psychological Science, 24, 181-188.
[31] Pizzighello, S., & Bressan, P. (2008). Auditory attention causes visual inattentional blindness. Perception, 37, 859-866.
[32] Recarte, M. A., & Nunes, L. M. (2000). Effects of verbal and spatial- imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 6, 31-43.
[33] Salvucci, D. D., & Beltowska, J. (2008). Effects of memory rehearsal on driver performance: Experiment and theoretical account. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50, 834-844.
[34] Schumacher, E. H., Seymour, T. L., Glass, J. M., Fencsik, D. E., Lauber, E. J., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12, 101-108.
[35] Shinar, D., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Effects of practice on interference from an auditory task while driving: A simulation study (No. HS809- H826).
[36] Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Crouch, D. J. (2006). A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Human Factors: The Jour- nal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48, 381-391.
[37] Strayer, D. L., & Drews, F. A. (2007). Cell-phone-induced driver distraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 128-131.
[38] Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual- task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychological Science, 12, 462-466.
[39] Tokunaga, R. A., Shimojo, A., Hagiwara, T., Kayaga, S., & Uchida, S. (2001). Effects of cellular telephone use while driving based on objective and subjective mental workload assessment. Proceedings of the International Driving Symposium on the Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design. Aspen, 112-117.
[40] Vergauwe, E., Barrouillet, P., & Camos, V. (2010). Do mental processes share a domain-general resource? Psychological Science, 21, 384-390.
[41] Wikman, A. S., Nieminen, T., & Summala, H. (1998). Driving experience and time-sharing during in-car tasks on roads of different width. Ergonomics, 41, 358-372.