基于博弈交叉效率DEA模型的服务模块化创新绩效测量—以江西省文化创意产业为例
Modular Services Innovation Performance Measurement Based on Game Cross-Efficiency DEA Model—Taking the Cultural and Creative Industries in Jiangxi as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/MM.2015.54015, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 2,613  浏览: 7,310  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 余长春*, 闫 明*:南昌航空大学经济管理学院,江西 南昌
关键词: 服务模块化创新绩效博弈交叉DEA江西文化创意产业Services Modular Innovation Performance Game Cross-Efficiency DEA Model Jiangxi Cultural and Creative Industry
摘要: 服务模块化作为一种新兴组织形式,是影响企业创新绩效的重要因素。本文以江西省文化创意产业为例,基于博弈交叉效率DEA模型,从组织的松散耦合性、标准界面规范、服务定制水平三个关键变量着手,在服务模块化程度与创新绩效两个层面进行了测量、对比与分析。研究发现,服务模块化程度在低于40%时,提高服务模块化程度会给创新绩效带来显著的促进作用;当服务模块化超过该限度后,则会给创新绩效带来负面影响。适当地提高组织的松散耦合性和服务定制水平,设置合理的标准界面,能够提升企业的创新绩效。
Abstract: As a new form of organization, service modular is an important factor affecting business innova-tion performance. Taking the cultural and creative industries of Jiangxi Province as an example, this paper started with three key variables: the loosely coupled nature of the organization, stan-dard interface specification, and service customization level, based on game cross-efficiency DEA model. We also measured, contrasted and analyzed modular service at two levels of innovation performance and services modularity. The study finds that service modularization degree is lower than 40%; it brings a significantly promoting effect on the innovation performance, when the service module exceeds the limit; it will give a negative impact on innovation performance. Improving the loosely coupled nature of the organization, standard interface specification and service customization level can enhance enterprises’ innovation performance.
文章引用:余长春, 闫明. 基于博弈交叉效率DEA模型的服务模块化创新绩效测量—以江西省文化创意产业为例[J]. 现代管理, 2015, 5(4): 99-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/MM.2015.54015

参考文献

[1] Drucker, P.E. (1990) The emerging theory of manufacturing. Harvard Business Review, 6, 94-102.
[2] Miozzo, M. and Grimshaw, D. (2005) Modularity and innovation in knowledge intensive business services: IT outsourcing in Germany and the UK. Research Policy, 34, 1419-1439.
http://dx.doi.org /10.1016/j.respol.2005.06.005
[3] Sanchez, R. and Mahoney, J.T. (1996) Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, l, 63-76.
http://dx.doi.org /10.1002/smj.4250171107
[4] Rognvaldur, S. (2005) On the inter-action between the growth process and the development of technical knowledge in young and growing technology-based firms. Technovation, 5, 223-235.
[5] Sundbo, J. (2004) Modulization of service production and a thesis of convergence between service and manufacturing organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 4, 75-89.
[6] Youngdahl, W.E. and Kellogg, D.L. (1997) The relationship between service customers’ quality assurance behaviors, satisfaction, and effort: A cost of quality perspective. Journal of Operation Management, 15, 19-32.
http://dx.doi.org /10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00097-6
[7] Tiwana, A. (2008) Does interfirm modularity complement ignorance: A field study of software outsourcing alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1241-1252.
http://dx.doi.org /10.1002/smj.694
[8] Sabel, C.F. and Zeitlin, J. (2004) Neither modularity nor relational contracting: Inter-firm collaboration in the new economy. Enterprise & Society, 5, 388-403.
http://dx.doi.org /10.1093/es/khh057
[9] Sanchez, R. (1995) Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 135-159
[10] Chen, K.M. and Liu, R.J. (2005) Interface strategies in modular product innovation. Technovation, 25, 771-782.
http://dx.doi.org /10.1016/j.technovation.2004.01.013
[11] Orton, J.D. and Weick, K.E. (1990) Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15, 203-223.
[12] Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A. and Pavitt, K. (2001) Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 597-621.
[13] 习玉柱 (2011) 组织模块化创新的动因分析. 华东经济管理, 4, 89-92.
[14] 范志刚, 刘洋, 赵江琦 (2014) 知识密集型服务业服务模块化界定与测度. 科学与科学技术管理, 1, 86-92.
[15] Worren, N., Moore, K. and Cardona, P. (2002) Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: A study of the home appliance industry. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 123-140.
[16] Mikkola, J.H. and Gassmann, O. (2003) Managing modularity of product architectures: Toward an integrated theory. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 204-218.
[17] Lin, B.W. (2004) Original equipment manufacturers manufacturing strategy for innovation agility: The case of Taiwanese manufacturing networks. International Journal of Production Research, 42, 943-957.
[18] 王建安, 张钢 (2008) 组织模块化及其测量: 一个基于松散耦合系统的分析框架. 西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版), 6, 47-53.
[19] Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W.D. and Zhu, J. (2008) The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium. Operations Research, 56, 1278-1288.
[20] Banker, R.D. (1980) A game theoretic approach to measuring efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 5, 265-266.
[21] 何建洪, 贺昌政 (2011) 创新能力与创新型企业评价研究. 管理学报, 2, 249-253.
[22] 李葳, 胡艳婷, 李丹 (2013) 基于粗糙集的文化产业科技创新能力评价研究. 科技与管理, 4, 21-23.
[23] 朱学冬, 陈雅兰 (2010) 创新型企业创新绩效评价研究——以福建省为例. 中国科技论坛, 9, 77-92.