大港探区上古生界烃源岩热史模拟——以泊古1井为例
Geothermal History Simulation of Upper Paleozonic Source Rocks in Dagang Prospecting Area—A Case Study of Well Bogu 1
DOI: 10.12677/JOGT.2016.384031, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,604  浏览: 6,238  科研立项经费支持
作者: 林小云, 刘俊峰, 魏民生, 张文慧:油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室(长江大学),湖北 武汉;长江大学地球科学学院,湖北 武汉;刘雨薇:中石油渤海钻探工程有限公司井下作业分公司,河北 任丘
关键词: 大港探区泊古1井烃源岩热史生烃史Dagang Prospecting Area Well Bogu 1 Source Rock Thermal History Hydrocarbon Generation History
摘要: 泊古1井位于渤海湾盆地中部的大港探区,沧县隆起西南侧泊头市附近。运用镜质体反射率(Ro)对大港探区上古生界烃源岩进行了热演化模拟并分析其生烃期次。研究表明,大港探区古生代热流值较低,到三叠纪(225 Ma)受印支运动的影响热流值持续升高,后因地层抬升剥蚀,热流值开始下降,直至渐新世末(25 Ma),随后热流值趋于平稳。印支、燕山、喜山3大构造运动造成的不整合面上地层剥蚀量分别为3600、1000、300 m。泊古1井上古生界太原组烃源岩在中三叠世末期(239 Ma)进入生烃门限,227 Ma达到生油高峰期,后期地层多次沉降抬升,现今处于成熟早期阶段;山西组烃源岩成熟度演化历程与太原组基本相似,但比太原组的演化程度略低一些。晚三叠世为主要生排烃期。
Abstract: Well Bogu 1 was located in the center of Bohai Bay Basion where Dagang Prospecting Area was si-tuated. It was near the Botou City which was in the southwest of Cangxian Uplift. By taking Ro as palaeotemperature scale, the geothermal history of upper paleozonic source rocks in Dagang Prospecting Area was simulated, and hydrocarbon generation stages were analyzed. The results showed that the heat flow value in Dagang Prospecting Area was lower in paleozonic. Affected by Indo-China movement, the heat flow value in Triassic (225 Ma) was continuously elevated. Because of the strata uplift and erosion, the heat flow value began to decline till the end of Oligocene (25 Ma); then it tended to be steady. The stratigraphic erosion amount on the unconformity surface in Indo-China movement, Yanshan movement and Himalayan movement was 3600, 1000 and 300 m, respectively. The source rock of the Upper Paleozonic Taiyuan Formation in Well Bogu 1 enters the hydrocarbon generation threshold in the late period of Middle Triassic (239 Ma). It reached oil generation peak in 227 Ma. The strata are suffered by several subsidences and uplifts in the late period. Nowadays it is at the early maturation stage. The maturity evolution process of Shanxi Formation source rock is basically similar to Taiyuan Formation, but the evolution degree is slightly lower than that of Taiyuan Formation. Late Triassic is the main period of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion.
文章引用:林小云, 刘俊峰, 魏民生, 张文慧, 刘雨薇. 大港探区上古生界烃源岩热史模拟——以泊古1井为例[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2016, 38(4): 10-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/JOGT.2016.384031

参考文献

[1] 廖前进, 于学敏, 何咏梅, 等. 大港探区上古生界煤系烃源岩特征及资源潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2003, 14(4): 250-253.
[2] 柳忠泉, 韩立国, 徐佑德, 等. 济阳坳陷新生代热演化特征研究[J]. 地质学报, 2008, 82(5): 663-667.
[3] 刘永涛. 沉积盆地热史恢复方法综述[J]. 内蒙古石油化工, 2009(2): 30-32.
[4] 胡圣标, 张容燕. 油气盆地热史恢复方法[J]. 勘探家, 1998, 3(4): 52-54.
[5] 陈刚, 赵重远, 李丕龙, 等. Ro反演的盆地热史恢复方法与相关问题[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23(4): 343-347.
[6] 魏志彬, 张大江, 许怀先, 等. EASY%Ro模型在我国西部中生代盆地热史研究中的应用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2001, 28(2): 43-46.
[7] 张文, 孙占学, 李文娟. Thermodel for windows系统的模拟及实例研究[J]. 华东理工学院学报, 2005, 28(4): 341- 346.
[8] 左银辉, 马维民, 邓已寻, 等. 查干凹陷中新生代热史及烃源岩热演化[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2013, 38(3): 553-560.
[9] 张杰, 邱楠生, 王昕, 等. 黄骅坳陷歧口凹陷热史和油气成藏史[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(4): 505-511.