智能手机软件的使用对视觉注意的影响
The Use of Smartphone Application Influence Human Visual Attention
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2017.74064, PDF, HTML, XML,  被引量 下载: 1,974  浏览: 3,223  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 何 颖, 敖 华, 陈宇庭, 陈 旭, 毕泰勇：西南大学心理学部，重庆
关键词: APP；视觉注意；ERP；APP； Visual Attention； ERP
摘要: 本研究利用行为实验和ERP技术两种方式探讨使用智能手机软件所获得的视觉经验对个体视知觉的改变的影响。首先，我们采用了视觉搜索和有效视野两种实验范式来测量参与者的视觉注意，两种范式中的目标刺激为参与者熟悉的软件图标和不熟悉的软件图标。结果发现，在视觉搜索范式中，参与者对于熟悉图标的搜索效率显著高于不熟悉图标；而在有效视野范式中，参与者对熟悉图标的探测敏感性也显著高于不熟悉图标。然后，在ERP实验中，我们采用了oddball范式，偏差刺激分别为熟悉的图标和不熟悉的图标，结果发现，熟悉图标引发的P2和P300成分的波幅均大于不熟悉的图标所引发的波幅。这些结果从行为和神经机制的角度说明了，手机频繁使用所导致的熟悉性的增加会增强人们对相关刺激的注意。
Abstract: In this study, we investigated the effects of visual experience gained by the use of smart phone APP on the visual perception in two ways: behavioral experiment and ERP technique. First of all, we used visual search task and useful field of view task to measure the visual attention of the subjects, and the target stimuli in the two paradigms were the familiar APP icons and unfamiliar APP icons. The results showed that, in the visual search paradigm, the search efficiency for familiar icons was significantly higher than unfamiliar icons; and in the useful field of view paradigm, the detection sensitivity for familiar icons also was better. Then, in the ERP experiment, we used the odd ball paradigm which the deviant stimuli were familiar icons and unfamiliar icons respectively. We found the average amplitudes of P2 and P300 to familiar icon were larger than unfamiliar icons. These results suggest that the increase in familiarity resulting from the frequent use of smart phones in life will increase attention to the relevant stimuli from both behavioral and electro physiological perspectives.
文章引用：何颖, 敖华, 陈宇庭, 陈旭, 毕泰勇 (2017). 智能手机软件的使用对视觉注意的影响. 心理学进展, 7(4), 518-530. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2017.74064

参考文献

[1] 钱若兵, 傅先明, 牛朝诗, 汪业汉, 魏建军, 魏祥品, 等(2008). 网络成瘾对青少年注意功能的影响. 中华神经医学杂志, 7(4), 376-379.
[2] Adini, Y., Sagi, D., & Tsodyks, M. (2002). Context-Enabled Learning in the Human Visual System. Nature, 415, 790-793.
https://doi.org/10.1038/415790a
[3] Augner, C., & Hacker, G. W. (2012). Associations between Problematic Mobile Phone Use and Psychological Parameters in Young Adults. International Journal of Public Health, 57, 437-441.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-011-0234-z
[4] Balas, B., Cox, D., & Conwell, E. (2007). The Effect of Real-World Personal Familiarity on the Speed of Face Information Processing. PLoS ONE, 2, e1223.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001223
[5] Ball, K. K., Beard, B. L., Roenker, D. L., Miller, R. L., & Griggs, D. S. (1988). Age and Visual Search: Expanding the Useful Field of View. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 5, 2210-2219.
https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.5.002210
[6] Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., & Glickman, S. (2005). Attentional Bias in Anxiety: A Behavioral and ERP Study. Brain and Cognition, 59, 11-22.
[7] Bobes, M. A., Quiñonez, I., Perez, J., Leon, I., & Valdés-Sosa, M. (2007). Brain Potentials Reflect Access to Visual and Emotional Memories for Faces. Biological Psychology, 75, 146-153.
[8] Caharel, S., Ramon, M., & Rossion, B. (2014). Face Familiarity Decisions Take 200 msec in the Human Brain: Electrophysiological Evidence from a Go/No-Go Speeded Task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 81-95.
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00451
[9] Carretié, L., Mercado, F., Tapia, M., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2001). Emotion, Attention, and the “Negativity Bias”, Studied through Event-Related Potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 41, 75-85.
[10] Casey, B. M. (2012). Linking Psychological Attributes to Smart Phone Addiction, Face-to-Face Communication, Present Absence And Social Capital. Doctoral Dissertation, Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
[11] Chen, A., Xu, P., Wang, Q., Luo, Y., Yuan, J., Yao, D., & Li, H. (2008). The Timing of Cognitive Control in Partially Incongruent Categorization. Human Brain Mapping, 29, 1028-1039.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20449
[12] Chiu, S. I. (2014). The Relationship between Life Stress and Smartphone Addiction on Taiwanese University Student: A Mediation Model of Learning Self-Efficacy and Social Self-Efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 49-57.
[13] Classen, S., Wang, Y., Crizzle, A. M., Winter, S. M., & Lanford, D. N. (2013). Predicting Older Driver On-Road Performance by Means of the Useful Field of View and Trail Making Test Part B. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 574-582.
https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2013.008136
[14] Clay, O. J., Wadley, V. G., Edwards, J. D., Roth, D. L., Roenker, D. L., & Ball, K. K. (2005). Cumulative Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Useful Field of View and Driving Performance in Older Adults: Current and Future Implications. Optometry & Vision Science, 82, 724-731.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.opx.0000175009.08626.65
[15] Clutterbuck, R., & Johnston, R. A. (2002). Exploring Levels of Face Familiarity by Using an Indirect Face-Matching Measure. Perception, 31, 985-994.
https://doi.org/10.1068/p3335
[16] Cohen, J. Y., Heitz, R. P., Woodman, G. F., & Schall, J. D. (2009). Neural Basis of the Set-Size Effect in Frontal Eye Field: Timing of Attention during Visual Search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101, 1699-1704.
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00035.2009
[17] Cosman, J. D., Lees, M. N., Lee, J. D., Rizzo, M., & Vecera, S. P. (2012). Visual Search for Features and Conjunctions Following Declines in the Useful Field of View. Experimental Aging Research, 38, 411-421.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2012.699370
[18] Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975). Stimulus Novelty, Task Relevance and the Visual Evoked Potential in Man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 131-143.
[19] Edwards, J. D., Vance, D. E., Wadley, V. G., Cissell, G. M., Roenker, D. L., & Ball, K. K. (2005). Reliability and Validity of Useful Field of View Test Scores as Administered by Personal Computer. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 529-543.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390490515432
[20] Fichtenholtz, H. M., Dean, H. L., Dillon, D. G., Yamasaki, H., McCarthy, G., & LaBar, K. S. (2004). Emotion-Attention Network Interactions during a Visual Oddball Task. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 67-80.
[21] Flowers, J. H., & Lohr, D. J. (1985). How Does Familiarity Affect Visual Search for Letter Strings? Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 557-567.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204922
[22] Gölcü, D., & Gilbert, C. D. (2009). Perceptual Learning of Object Shape. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 13621-13629.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2612-09.2009
[23] Gordon, I., & Tanaka, J. W. (2011). Putting a Name to a Face: The Role of Name Labels in the Formation of Face Memories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3280-3293.
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00036
[24] Gosling, A., & Eimer, M. (2011). An Event-Related Brain Potential Study of Explicit Face Recognition. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2736-2745.
[25] Grasso, D. J., Moser, J. S., Dozier, M., & Simons, R. (2009). ERP Correlates of Attention Allocation in Mothers Processing Faces of Their Children. Biological Psychology, 81, 95-102.
[26] Gray, H. M., Ambady, N., Lowenthal, W. T., & Deldin, P. (2004). P300 as an Index of Attention to Self-Relevant Stimuli. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 216-224.
[27] Hong, F. Y., Chiu, S. I., & Huang, D. H. (2012). A Model of the Relationship between Psychological Characteristics, Mobile Phone Addiction and Use of Mobile Phones by Taiwanese University Female Students. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2152-2159.
[28] Johnston, R. A., & Edmonds, A. J. (2009). Familiar and Unfamiliar Face Recognition: A Review. Memory, 17, 577-596.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210902976969
[29] Jonkman, L. M., Kemner, C., Verbaten, M. N., Engeland, H., Camfferman, G., Buitelaar, J. K., & Koelega, H. S. (2000). Attentional Capacity, a Probe ERP Study: Differences between Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Normal Control Children and Effects of Methylphenidate. Psychophysiology, 37, 334-346.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3730334
[30] Kemp, A. H., Benito, L. P., Quintana, D. S., Clark, C. R., McFarlane, A., Mayur, P. et al. (2010). Impact of Depression Heterogeneity on Attention: An Auditory Oddball Event Related Potential Study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 123, 202-207.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.08.010
[31] Langeslag, S. J., Franken, I. H., & Van Strien, J. W. (2008). Dissociating Love-Related Attention from Task-Related Attention: An Event-Related Potential Oddball Study. Neuroscience Letters, 431, 236-240.
[32] Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2014). The Relationship between Cell Phone Use, Academic Performance, Anxiety, and Satisfaction with Life in College Students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 343-350.
[33] McManus, B., Heaton, K., Vance, D. E., & Stavrinos, D. (2016). The Useful Field of View Assessment Predicts Simulated Commercial Motor Vehicle Driving Safety. Traffic Injury Prevention, 17, 763-769.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2015.1137560
[34] Müller, H. J., & Krummenacher, J. (2006). Visual Search and Selective Attention. Visual Cognition, 14, 389-410.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500527676
[35] Peelen, M. V., & Kastner, S. (2014). Attention in the Real World: Toward Understanding Its Neural Basis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 242-250.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.004
[36] Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An Integrative Theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128-2148.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019
[37] Purves, D., Wojtach, W. T., & Lotto, R. B. (2011). Understanding Vision in Wholly Empirical Terms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 15588-15595.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012178108
[38] Qin, X. A., Koutstaal, W., & Engel, S. A. (2014). The Hard-Won Benefits of Familiarity in Visual Search: Naturally Familiar Brand Logos Are Found Faster. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 914-930.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0623-5
[39] Richards, E., Bennett, P. J., & Sekuler, A. B. (2006). Age Related Differences in Learning with the Useful Field of View. Vision Research, 46, 4217-4231.
[40] Roberts, J. A., Pullig, C., & Manolis, C. (2015). I Need My Smartphone: A Hierarchical Model of Personality and Cell-Phone Addiction. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 13-19.
[41] Schoups, A. A., Vogels, R., & Orban, G. A. (1995). Human Perceptual Learning in Identifying the Oblique Orientation: Retinotopy, Orientation Specificity and Monocularity. The Journal of Physiology, 483, 797-810.
https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020623
[42] Schweinberger, S. R., Pickering, E. C., Burton, A. M., & Kaufmann, J. M. (2002). Human Brain Potential Correlates of Repetition Priming in Face and Name Recognition. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2057-2073.
[43] Senderecka, M., Grabowska, A., Gerc, K., Szewczyk, J., & Chmylak, R. (2012). Event-Related Potentials in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: An Investigation Using an Auditory Oddball Task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 85, 106-115.
[44] Seya, Y., Nakayasu, H., & Yagi, T. (2013). Useful Field of View in Simulated Driving: Reaction Times and eye Movements of Drivers. i-Perception, 4, 285-298.
https://doi.org/10.1068/i0512
[45] Sheehan, K. A., McArthur, G. M., & Bishop, D. V. (2005). Is Discrimination Training Necessary to Cause Changes in the P2 Auditory Event-Related Brain Potential to Speech Sounds? Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 547-553.
[46] Stahl, J., Wiese, H., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2008). Expertise and Own-Race Bias in Face Processing: An Event-Related Potential Study. NeuroReport, 19, 583-587.
https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f97b4d
[47] Stewart, J. L., Silton, R. L., Sass, S. M., Fisher, J. E., Edgar, J. C., Heller, W., & Miller, G. A. (2010). Attentional Bias to Negative Emotion as a Function of Approach and Withdrawal Anger Styles: An ERP Investigation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 76, 9-18.
[48] Sui, J., Zhu, Y., & Han, S. (2006). Self-Face Recognition in Attended and Unattended Conditions: An Event-Related Brain Potential Study. NeuroReport, 17, 423-427.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000203357.65190.61
[49] Tacikowski, P., & Nowicka, A. (2010). Allocation of Attention to Self-Name and Self-Face: An ERP Study. Biological Psychology, 84, 318-324.
[50] Tong, F., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Robust Representations for Faces: Evidence from Visual Search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1016-1035.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1016
[51] Wang, Q., Cavanagh, P., & Green, M. (1994). Familiarity and Pop-Out in Visual Search. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 495-500.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206946
[52] White, D., Burton, A. M., Kemp, R. I., & Jenkins, R. (2013). Crowd Effects in Unfamiliar Face Matching. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 769-777.
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2971
[53] Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0 a Revised Model of Visual Search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200774
[54] Wood, J. M., Chaparro, A., Lacherez, P., & Hickson, L. (2012). Useful Field of View Predicts Driving in the Presence of Distracters. Optometry & Vision Science, 89, 373-381.
https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31824c17ee
[55] Yu, C., Klein, S. A., & Levi, D. M. (2004). Perceptual Learning in Contrast Discrimination and the (Minimal) Role of Context. Journal of Vision, 4, 4.
https://doi.org/10.1167/4.3.4
[56] Yuan, J., He, Y., Zhang, Q., Chen, A., & Li, H. (2008). Gender Differences in Behavioral Inhibitory Control: ERP Evidence from a Two-Choice Oddball Task. Psychophysiology, 45, 986-993.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00693.x
[57] Yuan, J., Zhang, Q., Chen, A., Li, H., Wang, Q., Zhuang, Z., & Jia, S. (2007). Are We Sensitive to Valence Differences in Emotionally Negative Stimuli? Electrophysiological Evidence from an ERP Study. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2764-2771.