锡林郭勒盟不同草场利用方式下的生态经济效益—以镶黄旗敖包音高勒嘎查为例
Different Using Patterns of Grassland Utilization and Its Ecological and Economic Effect of Xilingol League—A Case Study of AoBaoYingaole, Xianghuangqi
DOI: 10.12677/GSER.2017.62014, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,529  浏览: 2,492  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 姹 苏, 海 山:内蒙古师范大学地理科学学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 内蒙古牧区草场利用方式可持续发展
Pastoral Areas of Inner Mongolia
Grassland Using Pattern Sustainable Development
摘要: 内蒙古锡林郭勒盟是我国重要牧业地区,属干旱、半干旱典型草原地区。早在1956年,内蒙古自治区提出了定居移场放牧的要求,到上世纪80年代初开始实行草畜双承包制度,具体分为三步实施:1982~1989年开始实行草畜双承包,把草场所有权划归嘎查所有;1989~1995年,采取到户、到联户、到浩特三种承包形式,进一步完善草场承包责任制;1996~1998年,根据《内蒙古自治区进一步落实完善草原“双权一制”的规定》,进一步落实了草场所有权、使用权和承包责任制,把草场使用权彻底承包到户。1983年国家实行草场承包制以后,直至1992年牧区一直实行着家庭联户经营方式。这种以照搬农区模式的分地到户、单户经营的模式,在干旱、半干旱,且降水不稳定,变率大的地区,通过30年的时间,证实了其并不适用于气候多变、地理环境脆弱且严峻的牧区。
Abstract: Xilingol League in Inner Mongolia is an important animal husbandry area in China, which is also a typical arid and semi-arid steppe area. As early as 1956, the requirements of the resettlement grazing were proposed in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, then the grass and livestock contract system was implemented at the early 80s of last century, and it was specifically divided into three steps: first grass and livestock contract was implemented in 1982-1998, and the ownership of the grass was placed under the Gacha; in 1989-1995, three kinds of contract forms: household contract, alliance household contract and Haote contract were conducted, which further improved the grassland contract responsibility system; in 1996-1998, according to the regulation to further implement and improve “double rights and one system” in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, the ownership, use right and contract responsibility system of the grassland were further practiced, and the use right of grassland absolutely belonged to the contractors. Since 1983, the contract system of grassland had been implemented and until 1992, the family co-operation mode was still used in the pastoral area. This kind of mode, which copied from agriculture, has been validated that it didn’t suitable for the pastoral area which has variable climate and fragile and severe geographical environment by using 30 years in this arid and semi-arid area where the precipitation is unstable and the variable rate is large.
文章引用:姹苏, 海山. 锡林郭勒盟不同草场利用方式下的生态经济效益—以镶黄旗敖包音高勒嘎查为例[J]. 地理科学研究, 2017, 6(2): 118-126. https://doi.org/10.12677/GSER.2017.62014

参考文献

[1] 呼格吉勒图. 内蒙古牧区区域发展条件与发展对策[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2004, 18(9): 10-14.
[2] 敖仁其. 对内蒙古草原草原畜牧业的再认识[J]. 内蒙古财经学院学报, 2001(3): 83-88.
[3] 王玉. 草原生态建设与少数民族繁荣[J]. 理论研究, 2000(6): 9-12.
[4] 杨思远. 从草场承包到草场整合——巴音图嘎嘎查草场使用权流转调查报告[EB/OL]. http://www.wyzxsx.com/Avticle/class16/200707/21544.html, 2007-07-23.
[5] 包利民, 杜富林, 原英. 内蒙古草原草原畜牧业可持续发展的研究[J]. 农业经济问题, 2002(s1): 35-36.
[6] 斯琴毕力格. 内蒙古牧民增收研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 中共中央党校, 2005: 3-4.
[7] 盖志毅. 社会主义新牧区建设特色论[J]. 西部论丛, 2007(1): 28-30.
[8] 盖志毅, 包庆丰, 杨志勇. 草原生态系统可持续发展与国家安全[J]. 北方经济, 2006(3): 17-19.
[9] 海山. 蒙古高原游牧文化中的环境道德及其现实意义[J]. 中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2002, 39(5): 58- 59.
[10] 艾金吉雅, 敖仁其. 论游牧文化的传统互助机制[J]. 原生态民族文化学刊, 2012, 5(3): 14.
[11] 雷毅著. 深层生态学思想研究[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2001: 28-29.
[12] 阿诺德•汤因比. 人类与大地母亲[M]. 徐波, 等, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2001: 78.
[13] Savory, A. and Butterfield, J. (1988) Holisyic Management: A New Framework for Decision Making. Islan Press, Washington DC.
[14] 吉田顺一. 游牧及其改革[J]. 内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2004, 12(30): 2-3.
[15] 马兴文. 草场使用及草权制度的历史变迁[J]. 柴达木开发研究, 2012(2): 33-36.
[16] 恩和, 额尔敦布和. 内蒙古草原荒漠化问题及其对策中日学术研讨会综述[J]. 内蒙古大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2002, 34(6): 113-116.
[17] 孙靖, 张学林. 影响青海牧民增收的制约因素及对策[J]. 中国农机化, 2003(6): 7-8.
[18] 敖仁其. 草原产权制度变迁与创新[J]. 内蒙古社会科学, 2003, 24(4): 116-120.
[19] 樊胜岳, 张卉. 草场使用权制度对牧民经济收入和草场退化的影响[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2007(5): 31-36.
[20] 额尔敦扎布. 草原荒漠化的制度经济学思考[J]. 内蒙古大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2002, 34(5): 8-12.