“一带一路”背景下电力企业创新范式演化路径与协同机理分析
Analysis the Innovation Paradigm Evolutionary Path and Synergy Mechanism of Power Enterprise under the Background of “The Belt and Road”
DOI: 10.12677/MM.2017.75033, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,749  浏览: 3,956  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 王 旭:山东财经大学工商管理学院,山东 济南;全球能源互联网(山东)协同创新中心,山东 济南;褚 旭:山东财经大学工商管理学院,山东 济南;赵 岩:国家电网山东省电力公司电力科学研究院,山东 济南
关键词: 协同创新演化路径国家电网公司全球能源互联网Synergy Innovation Evolutionary Path State Grid Corporation of China Global Energy Interconnection
摘要: 能源行业的全球化发展对于推进“一带一路”国家顶层战略具有重要实践意义和理论价值。本研究基于协同创新视角,以国家电网公司为研究案例,探讨了企业创新范式的演化路径,建构并剖析了企业协同创新范式,并从政治、社会、经济和技术环境四个维度分析了东道国宏观环境对国家电网公司创新协同机制的影响。研究结论显示:国家电网公司创新范式经过了技术创新驱动、管理创新嵌入和创新协同构建三个阶段,各阶段创新范式与战略意图存在显著差异;双元性技术创新、营销创新、组织创新和文化创新共同构成了协同创新体系,并且技术创新与管理创新之间存在单向影响和动态协同两种交互机制;另外,东道国不同维度的宏观环境对协同创新体系的作用点和影响机制具有明显差异。
Abstract: The global development of energy industry is of great practical significance and theoretical value in promoting the national top strategies of “the Belt and Road”. Based on the synergy innovation, this paper explores the evolutionary path of the enterprise innovation paradigm, constructs and analyzes the synergy innovation paradigm, and analyzes the influences between host countries’ macro environment and the mechanism of State Grid’s synergy innovation from the four dimensions of political, social, economic and technological environment. The conclusion shows that the innovation pattern of State Grid has gone through three stages: technological innovation drive, management innovation in setting and innovation synergy construction, and each stage shows differences in the innovation paradigm and strategic intentions. Exploitation and exploration innovation, marketing innovation, organizational innovation and culture Innovation constitute a synergy innovation system, and existing two interactive mechanisms which are one-way impact and dynamic synergy between technological innovation and management innovation. In addition, there are differences about impact and significant mechanism to synergy innovation between the host countries’ macro-environment of different dimensions.
文章引用:王旭, 褚旭, 赵岩. “一带一路”背景下电力企业创新范式演化路径与协同机理分析[J]. 现代管理, 2017, 7(5): 235-244. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2017.75033

参考文献

[1] 王鹤春, 苏敬勤, 曹慧玲. 第三方物流企业管理创新的适配路径分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2013(4): 128-135.
[2] 苏敬勤, 崔淼. 核心技术创新与管理创新的适配演化[J]. 管理科学, 2010, 23(1): 27-37.
[3] 许庆瑞, 谢章澍. 企业创新协同及其演化模型研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2004(3): 327-332.
[4] 苏敬勤, 林海芬, 李晓昂. 产品创新过程与管理创新关系探索性案例研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013(1): 70-78.
[5] 陈劲, 王方瑞. 再论企业技术和市场的协同创新——基于协同学序参量概念的创新管理理论研究[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2005(2): 1-5.
[6] Lin, C.Y. and Chen, M.Y. (2007) Does Innovation Lead to Performance? An Empirical Study of SMES in Taiwan. Management Research News, 30, 115-132.
https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170710722955
[7] 王旭, 张晓峰. 组织双元性、创新协同与企业绩效: 基于战略一致性的调节作用[J]. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2015(1): 70-79.
[8] Birkinshaw, J. and Mol, M.J. (2006) How Management Innovation Happens. Sloan Management Review, 47, 81-88.
[9] March, J.G. (1991) Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
[10] Cosh, A., et al. (2012) Organization Structure and Innovation Performance in Different Environment. Small Business Economics, 39, 301-317.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9304-5