付费模式与主体信用评级的关系研究
Payment Arrangement and Credit Rating in China
DOI: 10.12677/FIN.2017.75029, PDF, HTML, XML,   
作者: 王汀汀*, 符一尘：中央财经大学金融学院，北京；秦 丽：四川省电力公司资阳供电公司人力资源部，四川 资阳
关键词: 主体信用评级；发行人付费；投资人付费；Credit Rating； Paid by Issuers； Paid by Investors
摘要: 2008年全球金融危机和2014年起国内频发的债券违约事件引起了市场对信用评级质量的担忧。本文梳理了国内外信用评级行业的发展历史和现状，并基于2016年信用评级样本，分析了不同付费模式下主体信用评级结果的差异。研究发现，对同样的主体，发行人付费模式的评级高于投资人付费时的评级；同时，发行人付费模式下，评级过程中财务指标的弹性较大。
Abstract: The financial crisis in 2008 and massive bond defaults since 2014 in China has attracted increas-ing attention to the quality of credit rating. Based on a sample of 2006, this paper analyzes the difference of credit rating between two kinds of payment arrangement. We find that, if it is paid by the issuing company, the rating results are higher on average, and the financial indicators of companies in the same rating level are more diversified. Our results mean that credit rating paid by investor could be more objective.
文章引用：王汀汀, 符一尘, 秦丽. 付费模式与主体信用评级的关系研究[J]. 金融, 2017, 7(5): 287-298. https://doi.org/10.12677/FIN.2017.75029

参考文献

[1] Jiang, X.F., Stanford, M.H. and Xie, Y. (2012) Does It Matter Who Pays for Bond Ratings? Historical Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 607-621.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.04.001
[2] 刘锴. 我国外部信用评级付费模式分析[J]. 征信, 2013, 31(7): 48-52.
[3] 吴建航. 不同付费模式下评级结果的实证研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2014.
[4] 蔡国喜, 陈代娣, 杨勤宇. 主动的“市场看门人”: 主动评级业务探索[J]. 金融市场研究, 2012(2).
[5] Bartels, B. and Weder, B. (2013) A Rating Agency for Europe-A Good Idea? CEPR Discussion Paper, 149, 867-868.
[6] Bai, L. (2010) On Regulating Conflicts of Interest in the Credit Rating Industry. New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 2, 253-283.
[7] Doherty, N.A., Kartasheva, A.V. and Phillips, R.D. (2012) Information Effect of Entry into Credit Ratings Market: The Case of Issuers’ Ratings. Journal of Financial Economics, 106, 308-330.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.012
[8] Xia, H. (2014) Can Investor-Paid Credit Rating Agencies Improve the Information Quality of Issuer-Paid Rating Agencies? Journal of Financial Economics, 111, 450-468.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.015
[9] 李增福. 信用评级收费模式:机制与选择[J]. 上海金融, 2008(1): 36-39.
[10] 房友军. 信贷市场信用评级收费模式的路径选择[[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2012.
[11] Frenkel, S. (2015) Repeated Interaction and Rating Inflation: A Model of Double Reputation. SSRN Electronic Journal, 7, 250-80.
https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20110077
[12] Holden, S., Natvik, G.J. and Vigier, A. (2012) An Equilibrium Model of Credit Rating Agencies. Social Science Electronic Publishing, New York.
[13] 苗春萌. 我国信用评级业收费模式研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2012.
[14] 包香明, 朱建新. 我国信用评级收费模式的再思考[J]. 中国投资, 2011(2): 94-97.
[15] 应娟, 张益新. 信用评级机构收费模式探讨[J]. 上海金融, 2006(6): 73-75.
[16] 曹艳蓉. 信用评级付费模式改革的法律透视[J]. 学术交流, 2012(8): 48-52.
[17] 卜谦. 评级机构最优收费模式探讨[J]. 经济视野, 2013(16).
[18] 徐庆. 信用评级机构付费模式改革及对我国的启示[J]. 华北金融, 2016(7): 10-14.

为你推荐