组织社会学视角下我国大学的“跟风”现象研究
On the “Follow-The-Majority” Phenomenon in China Universities from the Perspective of Organizational Sociology
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2012.12009, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 3,195  浏览: 8,428 
作者: 钟建伟*:江西师范大学体育学院;刘玉华:江西师范大学外国语学院
关键词: 组织行为大学制度环境“跟风”Organizational Behavior; University; Institutional Environment; “Follow-The-Majority”
摘要: 我国大学的“跟风”现象已成为制约我国大学创新发展的主要障碍之一。本文欲从组织社会学的视角,对我国大学出现的“跟风”的现象及其背后机制进行考察。研究结果认为我国大学具有制度化组织的特征,大学通过“跟风”行为在我国教育制度环境下获得“社会合法性”,从而维持其生存与发展。而要从根本上根除这种跟风行为必须从改变我国大学的制度化组织特征和优化大学所处制度环境入手,通过引入市场治理等手段提高我国大学的管理绩效。
Abstract: The so-called “follow-the-majority” phenomenon has become one of the major obstacles for the innovative development in China’s universities. The present study aims at the research of the phenomenon and its hidden working system from the perspective of organizational sociology. The study shows that there are features of institutional organizations in China universities; various universities gain their social legitimacy through “follow-the-majority” under the current education system, therefore maintain its survival and development. It is found that changes need be started from the institutional organizational features and envi- ronment, along with the introduction of market management in order to eradicate the “follow-the-majority” trend and improve the management performance in universities.
文章引用:钟建伟, 刘玉华. 组织社会学视角下我国大学的“跟风”现象研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2012, 1(2): 59-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2012.12009

参考文献

[1] 张惠芬, 金忠明, 编著. 中国教育简史(修订版)[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2001: 433-437.
[2] J. Meyer, B. Rowen. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83(2): 340-363.
[3] 周雪光. 组织社会学十讲[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2003: 87.
[4] 李猛, 周飞舟, 李康. 单位: 制度化组织的内部机制[Z]. In: 中国社会科学院社会学研究所, 编, 中国社会学(第二卷). 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2003: 135-167.
[5] 申素平. 论我国高等教育体制改革过程中政府角色的转变[J]. 高教探索, 2000, 4: 50-53.
[6] 试论中国的高等教育体制改革[URL], 2004. http://www.edu.cn/20011224/3015093.shtml
[7] P. S. Tolbert, L. G. Zucker. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28(1): 22-39.