2型糖尿病合并肌少症患者骨骼肌质量指数与内脏脂肪面积相关性研究
Correlation between Skeletal Muscle Mass Index and Visceral Fat Area in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Sarcopenia
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.134958, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 213  浏览: 326 
作者: 王志新, 吴乃君*, 史嘉琳, 张妍妍:华北理工大学附属医院内分泌科,河北 唐山
关键词: 2型糖尿病肌少症内脏脂肪面积胰岛素抵抗Type 2 Diabetes Sarcopenia Visceral Fat Area Insulin Resistance
摘要: 目的:探讨2型糖尿病(Type 2 diabetes, T2DM)合并肌少症患者骨骼肌质量指数与内脏脂肪面积(VFA)的相关性,为T2DM合并肌少症的防治提供参考。方法:选取华北理工大学附属医院2021年10月~2022年7月住院2型糖尿病患者50例,根据生物电阻抗法检测四肢的骨骼肌含量,计算骨骼肌质量指数(ASMI)并根据2014年亚洲肌少症工作组(AWGS)诊断标准将研究对象分为两组:T2DM合并肌少症组20例为病例组,T2DM非肌少症组30例为对照组。收集两组患者年龄、性别、糖尿病病程、身体质量指数(BMI)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、甘油三酯(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL-C)、腰臀比(WHR)、体脂肪及内脏脂肪面积(VFA)。结果:单因素分析中病例组BMI、WHR、体脂肪均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。Logistic回归分析结果显示VFA (P < 0.05,OR值1.111)是影响T2DM合并肌少症患者的影响因素(P < 0.05)。结论:T2DM患者中内脏肥胖与肌少症发生紧密相关,VFA是T2DM合并肌少症的危险因素(P < 0.05)。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the correlation between skeletal muscle mass index and visceral fat area (VFA) in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with sarcopenia, and to provide reference for the prevention and treatment of T2DM patients with sarcopenia. Methods: Fifty patients with type 2 diabetes who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Science and Technology from October 2021 to July 2022 were selected. The skeletal muscle content of the limbs was detected by bioresistance method, and the skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI) was calculated. The subjects were divided into two groups according to the diagnostic criteria of Asian sarcopenia Working Group (AWGS) in 2014: 20 patients in T2DM combined with sarcopenia group were the case group and 30 patients in T2DM non-sarcopenia group were the control group. Age, sex, diabe-tes course, body mass index (BMI), glycohemoglobin (HbA1c), triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein (HDL-C), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), body fat and visceral fat area (VF) were collected in 2 groups A. Results: In univariate analysis, BMI, WHR, body fat and skeletal muscle mass index in case group were lower than those in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that VFA (P < 0.05, OR 1.111) was the influential factor for T2DM patients with sarcopenia (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Visceral obesity is closely associated with sarcopenia in T2DM patients, and VFA is a risk factor for T2DM patients with sarcopenia (P < 0.05).
文章引用:王志新, 吴乃君, 史嘉琳, 张妍妍. 2型糖尿病合并肌少症患者骨骼肌质量指数与内脏脂肪面积相关性研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(4): 6850-6854. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.134958

1. 引言

肌少症最早由Rosenberg [1] 率先提出此概念,指与年龄相关的老年综合征,以渐进性骨骼肌的肌肉质量损失以及肌肉功能的降低为主要特点。随着我国人口老龄化的推进,与衰老相关的骨骼肌质量减少与老年人诸多的不良健康问题紧密相连。增加了身体虚弱、残疾、跌倒及心血管系统疾病风险 [2] 。Kim [3] 等人报道,T2DM患者患肌减少症的风险是健康人群的3倍,认为肌少症成为T2DM患者新的并发症,与T2DM的发病机制紧密相关。随着机体衰老身体成分出现一系列变化,主要体现在肌肉质量的减少,脂肪组织在骨骼肌中重新分配,出现皮下脂肪减少而内脏脂肪增加 [4] 。T2DM患者多有合并有内脏肥胖,内脏脂肪的增加可进一步加重T2DM患者胰岛素抵抗,诱发炎症的发生,影响骨骼肌的代谢。因次本文旨在探讨T2DM合并肌少症患者骨骼肌质量指数与VFA的关系,为临床T2DM患者防治肌少症的发生提供参考。

2. 资料与方法

2.1. 一般资料

选取2021年10月~2022年7月华北理工大学附属医院住院2型糖尿病患者50例为研究对象,其中2型糖尿病合并肌少症患者20例为观察组,男10例,女10例。2型糖尿病非肌少症组30例为对照组,男9例,女21例。所有患者均符合1999年WHO糖尿病的诊断标准,肌少症诊断符合2014年亚洲肌少症工作组(AWGS)共识中的诊断标准。排除标准:① 1型糖尿病、特殊类型糖尿病、妊娠糖尿病患者。② 近3个月出现糖尿病酮症酸中毒及高渗高血糖等急性并发症。③ 近半年内口服激素类药物。④ 严重心脏系统疾病(安装有心脏起搏器、心脏支架)、肾脏或肝脏疾病、传染性疾病、自身免疫性疾病、恶性肿瘤。⑤ 长期活动障碍、残疾及认知功能差。⑥ 依从性差、不配合检查患者。所有受试者均知晓本项研究并签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理要求。

2.2. 方法

一般资料收集:收集50例所有患者的身高、体重、年龄、性别、糖尿病病程、腰围、臀围,计算腰臀比(WHR) = 腰围(cm)/臀围(cm)、体质指数(BMI) = 体质量(kg)/身高(m)2,采用InBody 770人体成分分析仪(殷巴迪有限公司),通过生物电阻抗法检测测定体脂肪、四肢肌肉质量及VFA,计算四肢肌肉质量指数(ASMI) = 四肢肌肉质量(kg)/身高(m)2,其中男性ASMI < 7.0 kg/m2,女性ASMI < 5.4 kg/m2定义为低肌肉质量。测定步速:选取约6 m的长廊,测试者以日常行走的步速走完,记录通过时间,总共测定3次,计算平均步速。并以步速 < 0.8 m/s为临界值,判定步速降低。测定握力:患者自然直立,双臂自然下垂身体两侧,用优势手连续测量3次,取最大值。男性握力 < 26 kg,女性握力 < 18 kg,判定握力下降。当低肌肉质量同时伴有步速和(或)握力下降即可诊断肌少症。实验室检查:所有检测者均禁食12 h,于次日晨起采集空腹肘静脉血,测定糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、甘油三酯(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL-C)。

2.3. 统计学方法

采用SPSS25.0统计软件进行统计分析,正态分布计量资料以 x ¯ ± s 表示,两组间比较采用t检验。不服从正态分布的数据用中位数(P25, P75)表示,组间比较采用非参数秩和检验。计数资料以n(%)表示,采用c2检验。以二元logistic回归分析T2DM合并肌少症患者的影响因素,以P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。

3. 结果

1) 两组一般资料比较:病例组患者BMI、WHR、体脂肪均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);两组间年龄、性别、病程、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、甘油三酯(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL-C)差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05),见表1

Table 1. Comparison of two groups of general data ( x ¯ ± s )

参考文献

[1] Rosenburg, I. (1989) Summary Comments: Epidemiological and Methodological Problems in Determining Nutritional Status of Older Persons. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 50, 1231-1233.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/50.5.1231
[2] Tabara, Y., Ikezoe, T., Yamanaka, M., et al. (2019) Advanced Gly-cation End Product Accumulation Is Associated with Low Skeletal Muscle Mass, Weak Muscle Strength, and Reduced Bone Density: The Nagahama Study. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 74, 1446-1453.
https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly233
[3] Kim, T.N., Park, M.S., Yang, S.J., et al. (2010) Prevalence and Deter-minant Factors of Sarcopenia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The Korean Sarcopenic Obesity Study (KSOS). Diabetes Care, 33, 1497-1499.
https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-2310
[4] Murai, J., Nishizawa, H., Otsuka, A., et al. (2018) Low Muscle Quality in Japanese Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Visceral Fat Accumulation. Cardiovascular Diabetology, 17, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-018-0755-3
[5] Wang, M., Tan, Y., Shi, Y., et al. (2020) Diabetes and Sarcopenic Obesity: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatments. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 11, 568.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00568
[6] 段明, 张欣欣, 孔悠然, 孙晓方, 董冰子, 王颜刚, 袁鹰. 2型糖尿病患者肌肉量减少的多因素分析[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2020, 36(9): 778-782.
[7] Yamada, M., Moriguch, Y., Mitani, T., et al. (2014) Age-Dependent Changes in Skeletal Muscle Mass and Visceral Fat Area in Japanese Adults from 40 to 79 Years-of-Age. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 14, 8-14.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12209
[8] Halberg, N., Khan, T., Trujillo, M.E., et al. (2009) Hypoxia-Inducible Fac-tor 1α Induces Fibrosis and Insulin Resistance in White Adipose Tissue. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 29, 4467-4483.
https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00192-09
[9] Holloway, G.P., Chou, C.J., Lally, J., et al. (2011) Increasing Skeletal Muscle Fatty Acid Transport Protein 1 (FATP1) Targets Fatty Acids to Oxidation and Does Not Predispose Mice to Di-et-Induced Insulin Resistance. Diabetologia, 54, 1457-1467.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-011-2114-8
[10] Lira, F.S., Rosa, J.C., Dos Santos, R.V., et al. (2011) Visceral Fat Decreased by Long-Term Interdisciplinary Lifestyle Ther-apy Correlated Positively with Interleukin-6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α and Negatively with Adiponectin Levels in Obese Adolescents. Metabolism, 60, 359-365.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2010.02.017
[11] Kim, K.H., Choi, S., Zhou, Y., et al. (2017) Hepatic FXR/SHP Axis Modulates Systemic Glucose and Fatty Acid Homeostasis in Aged Mice. Hepatology, 66, 498-509.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29199