汉字语义通达中语音的激活与作用
Phonological Activation during Semantic Access in Chinese Character Reading
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2012.25036, PDF, HTML, XML,  被引量   
作者: 孔令跃*：北京大学对外汉语教育学院；康翠萍：北京师范大学脑与认知科学研究院；穆彦丁：华南理工大学电子与信息学院
关键词: Stroop效应；语音作用；语义通达；The Stroop Effect; The Role of Phonology; Semantic Access
摘要: 本研究以Stroop范式考查汉字语义通达中语音的激活与作用这一阅读研究中的核心问题。在颜色命名实验中，颜色字及其同音字或者以一致的颜色书写，或者以不一致的颜色书写，要求被试说出它们的印刷颜色。我们发现颜色字命名既出现了干扰效应，也出现了促进效应。但字频相对低的颜色字的同音字命名中只出现了干扰效应而没有促进效应。这些结果表明汉字语义通达中语音自动激活，但不是语义激活所必需的成份，语义可由字形直接快速有效激活。
Abstract: A key issue in reading research is to understand the role of phonology in word meaning access. In the present study, the question was that if phonology will be activated in access of Chinese character meaning. Three experiments on naming were conducted with the Stroop paradigm, in which participants named the print color of Chinese color words and their homophones. Analyses showed Stroop interference and facilitation for homophones of high-frequency color words but a different pattern for homophones of low-frequency color words, in which only interference but no facilitation effects were observed. These results indicate that phonological activation is not obligatory in the visual semantic retrieval of Chinese character. Although phonology can be automatically activated and used to activate the character meaning, it only plays a secondary role. The character meaning could be gotten at rapidly along the orthographic-semantic route.
文章引用：孔令跃, 康翠萍, 穆彦丁 (2012). 汉字语义通达中语音的激活与作用. 心理学进展, 2(5), 229-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2012.25036

参考文献

[1] 现代汉语频率词典(1986). 北京: 北京语言学院语言研究所出版.
[2] Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-spe- cific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 4, 207-214.
[3] Besner, D., & Stolz, J. A. (1998). Unintentional reading: Can phonological computation be controlled? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 35-42.
[4] Bi, Y., Han, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Reading does not depend on writ- ing, even in Chinese. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1193-1199.
[5] Chen, H. C., & Shu, H. (2001). Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 511-518.
[6] Coltheart, M. (2000). Dual routes from print to speech and dual routes from print to meaning: Some theoretical issues. In: A. Kennedy, R. Radach, J. Pynte, & D. Heller, (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 475-490). Oxford: Elsevier.
[7] Dennis, I., & Newstead, S. (1981). Is phonological recoding automatic? Memory and Cognition, 9, 472-477.
[8] Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
[9] Guo, T., Peng, D., & Liu, Y. (2005). The role of phonological activation in the visual semantic retrieval of Chinese characters. Cognition, 98, B21-B34.
[10] Han, Z. Z., & Bi, Y. C. (2009). Reading comprehension without phonological mediation: Further evidence from a Chinese aphasic individual. Science in China Series C, Life Sciences, 52, 492-499.
[11] Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 120, 358-394.
[12] Kong, L., Zhang, J.-X., Ho, S.-H., & Kang, C. (2010). Phonology and access to Chinese character meaning. Psychological Reports, 107, 899-913.
[13] Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1998). Stroop-type interference: Congruity effects in color naming with typewritten responses. Journal of Experi-mental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 978- 992.
[14] Luo, C. R. (1999). Semantic competition as the basis of Stroop interference: Evidence from color-word matching task. Psychological Science, 10, 35-40.
[15] MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
[16] McCusker, L. X., Hillinger, M. L., & Bias, R. C. (1981). Phonological recoding and reading. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 217-245.
[17] Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112, 43-59.
[18] Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 24, 101-118.
[19] Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53, 97-145.
[20] Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[21] Spinks, J. A., Liu, Y., Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (2000). Reading Chinese characters for meaning: The role of phonological information. Cognition, 76, B1-B11.
[22] Taft, M., & van Graan, G. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 203-224.
[23] Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., Sneg, R., & Baruch, O. (1996). Unintentional word reading via the phonological route: The Stroop effect with cross-script homophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 336-349.
[24] Zhang, Q., Zhang, J.-X., & Kong, L. (2009) An ERP study on the time course of phonological and semantic activation in Chinese word recognition. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 73, 235-245.
[25] Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999). Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 579-606.