潜在蒸散发公式对汉江流域径流模拟结果的影响
Impact of Potential Evapotranspiration on Runoff Simulation in Hanjiang Basin
DOI: 10.12677/JWRR.2012.14025, PDF, HTML,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 熊立华*, 张晓琳*, 林 琳, 李 帅*：武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室
关键词: 潜在蒸散发；月水量平衡模型；径流模拟；汉江流域；Potential Evapotranspiration; Monthly Water Balance Model; Runoff Simulation; Hanjiang Basin
摘要: 采用FAO-56 Penman-Monteith(PM)、Hargreaves(Har)、Blaney-Criddle(B-C)、Thornthwaite(Tho)和Hamon(Ham)等5种潜在蒸散发公式计算汉江41个子流域的月潜在蒸散发量，将其作为蒸发输入数据代入两参数月水量平衡模型中模拟各子流域的月径流过程。模型参数的率定选用SCE-UA算法。径流模拟结果显示：1) 对于每一个潜在蒸散发计算公式，两参数月水量平衡模型在41个子流域上的效率系数的平均值均达到80%以上；2) 使用Ham方法模拟精度最优，每个子流域的效率系数均达到70%以上，PM法、Har和B-C法略差，Tho方法模拟精度最差。
Abstract: The FAO-56 Penman-Monteith equation (PM) and four other temperature-based equations, i.e. Hargreaves (Har), Blaney-Criddle (B-C), Thornthwaite (Tho) and Hamon (Ham), were used to estimate the monthly potential evapotranspiration at 41 sub catchments in Hanjiang basin. The monthly runoff of each catchment was then simulated using the two-parameter monthly water balance model based on the estimated potential evapotranspiration data. The parameter calibration method was chosen to be SCE-UA algorithm. A comparison among the simulation results using five different monthly potential evapotranspiration equations showed that: 1) the average model efficiency of two-parameter monthly water balance model over 41 sub catchments is more than 80% for each different monthly potential evapotranspiration equation; 2) the simulation result is best when using the Ham equation, with the model efficiency at each of 41 catchment larger than 70%, while the results of the PM, Har, and B-C equations are relatively poor, and the Tho method is the worst.
文章引用：熊立华, 张晓琳, 林琳, 李帅. 潜在蒸散发公式对汉江流域径流模拟结果的影响[J]. 水资源研究, 2012, 1(4): 175-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/JWRR.2012.14025

参考文献

[1] THORNTHWAITE, C. W., MATHER, J. R. The water balance. Publications in Climatology. Lab. Drexel Institute of Technology, 1955, 8(1): 1-104.
[2] PALMER, W. C. Meteorologic drought. US Weather Bureau Re- search Paper, 1965.
[3] THOMAS, H. A. Improved methods for national water assessment, report, contract WR15249270. Washington DC: US Water Resources Council, 1981.
[4] GUO, S. Impact of climate change on hydrological balance and water resources systems in the Dongjiang Basin, China. Modeling and Management of Sustainable Basin-Scale Water Resources, July 1995 LAHS Publ.No.231, 1995.
[5] XIONG, L., GUO, S. A two-parameter monthly water balance model and its application. Journal of Hydrology, 1999, 216(1): 111-123.
[6] ALLEY, W. M. On the treatment of evapotranspiration, soil moisture accounting, and aquifer recharge in monthly water balance models. Water Resources Research, 1984, 20(8): 1137-1149.
[7] VANDEWIELE, G. L., WIN, N. L. Monthly water balance models for 55 basins in 10 countries. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 1998, 43(5): 687-699.
[8] XU, C. Y., SINGH, V. P. A review on monthly water balance models for water resources investigations. Water Resources Management, 1998, 12(1): 31-50.
[9] 李帅, 熊立华, 万民. 月水量平衡模型的比较研究[J]. 水文, 2011, 31(5): 35-41. LI Shuai, XIONG Lihua and WAN Min. Comparison of monthly water balance models. Journal of China Hydrology, 2011, 31(5): 35-41. (in Chinese)
[10] XU, C. Y., SINGH, V. P. Evaluation of three complementary relationship evapotranspiration models by water balance approach to estimate actual regional evapotranspiration in different climatic regions. Journal of Hydrology, 2005, 308(1-4): 105- 121.
[11] 秦年秀, 陈喜, 薛显武, 等. 潜在蒸散发量计算公式在贵州省适用性分析[J]. 水科学进展, 2010, 21(3): 357-363. QIN Nianxiu, CHEN Xi, XUE Xianwu, et al. An applicability study of potential evapotranspiration models in Guizhou Prov- ince. Advances in Water Science, 2010, 21(3): 357-363. (in Chinese)
[12] 张晓琳, 熊立华, 林琳, 等. 五种潜在蒸散发方法在汉江流域的应用[J]. 干旱区地理, 2012, 35(2): 229-237. ZHANG Xiaolin, XIONG Lihua, LIN Lin, et al. The application of five potential evapotranspiration equations in Hanjiang Basin. Arid Land Geography, 2012, 35(2): 229-237. (in Chinese)
[13] ALLEN, R. G., PEREIRA, L. S., RAES, D., et al. Crop evapo- transpiration guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, Rome, 1998: 1-300.
[14] 刘晓英, 李玉中, 王庆锁. 几种基于温度的参考作物蒸散量计算方法评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(6): 12-18. LIU Xiaoying, LI Yuzhong and WANG Qingsuo. Evaluation on several temperature-based methods for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration. Transaction of CSAE, 2006, 22(6): 12-18. (in Chinese)
[15] 王声峰, 段爱旺, 张展羽. 半干旱地区不同水文年Hargreaves和P-M公式的对比分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(7): 29-33. WANG Shengfeng, DUAN Aiwang and ZHANG Zhanyu. Comparison and analysis of Hargreaves equation and Pen-man-Mon-teith equation during the different hydrological years in the semi-arid region. Transaction of CSAE, 2008, 24(7): 29-33. (in Chinese)
[16] XU, C. Y., SINGH, V. P. Evaluation and generalization of temperature-based methods for calculating evaporation. Hydrological Processes, 2001, 15(2): 305-319.
[17] PAPADOPOULOU, E., VARANOU, E., BALTAS, E., et al. Estimating potential evapotranspiration and its spatial distribu- tion in Greece using empirical methods. 8th International Con- ference on Environmental Science and Technology, Lemnos Is- land, 8-10 September 2003: 650-658.
[18] 唐丽霞, 张志强, 王新杰, 等. 晋西黄土高原丘陵沟壑区清水河流域径流对土地利用和气候变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(7): 800-810. TANG Lixia, ZHANG Zhiqiang, WANG Xinjie, et al. Streamflow response to climate and land use changes in Qingshui River watershed in the loess hilly-gully region of Western Shanxi Province, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(7): 800-810. (in Chinese)
[19] 彭世彰, 徐俊增. 参考作物蒸发蒸腾量计算方法的应用比较[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2004, 23(6): 5-9. PENG Shizhang, XU Junzeng. Comparison of reference crop evapotranspiration computing methods. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2004, 23(6): 5-9. (in Chinese)
[20] 黄锡荃, 李惠明, 金伯欣. 水文学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1992. HUANG Xiquan, LI Huiming and JIN Boxin. Hydrology. Beijing: China Education Press, 1992. (in Chinese)
[21] NASH, J. E., SUTCLIFFE, J. V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Journal of Hydrology, 1970, 10(3): 282-290.
[22] DUAN, Q. Y., GUPTA, V. K. and SOROOSHIAN, S. Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Application, 1993, 76(3): 501-521.
[23] SOROOSHIAN, S., DUAN, Q. Y. and GUPTA, V. K. Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. Journal of Hydrology, 1994, 158(3-4): 265- 284.