股权结构、高管薪酬与公司业绩——来自电力行业上市公司的证据
Ownership Structure, Executive Officer’s Payment and Firm Performance——Evidence from Electric Industry Listed Firms
摘要: 股权结构与高管薪酬是影响公司业绩的主要因素。文章在对相关文献进行深入研究的基础上提出理论假说，以ROA作为公司业绩的主要指标，运用面板估计方法对理论假设进行了实证检验。结果表明，股权集中度与公司业绩呈倒U型关系，高管持股比例与公司业绩呈现显著正相关；在国有控股的上市公司中，高管薪酬与公司业绩的正相关性不显著；第一大股东的持股比例与公司业绩之间存在较为显著的非线性关系，股权制衡有助于提高公司业绩的假说也得到证实。
Abstract: Ownership Structure and Executive Officer’s Payment are key factors to firm performance. This paper proposes theoretical hypotheses based on deep study on related material; it chooses ROA as the primary indicator of firm performance, and uses panel approach to empirically analyze through electric industry listed firms. The results show that: the relation between ownership concentration and performance is inverted U shaped, the proportion of executive ownership is positively related to firm performance; the relation between executive officer’s payment and firm performance is not significant in the state-controlled listed firms. In addition, FSP is non-linear relation with company performance; the hypothesis that the balances of stock ownership will help to improve firm performance has been confirmed.
文章引用：李世尧. 股权结构、高管薪酬与公司业绩——来自电力行业上市公司的证据[J]. 国际会计前沿, 2012, 1(3): 13-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/FIA.2012.13003

参考文献

[1] H. Demsetz. The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economies, 1983, 26(2): 375-390.
[2] C. G. Holderness, D. P. Sheehan. The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations. Journal of Financial Economies, 1988, 20: 317-346.
[3] J. J. McConnell, H. Servaes. Additional evidence on equity own- ership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economies, 1990, 27(2): 596-612.
[4] M.-H. Cho. Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economies, 1998, 47(1): 103-121.
[5] M. C. Jensen, W. H. Meckling. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economies, 1976, 3(4): 305-360.
[6] R. Morck, A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economies, 1988, 20(1-2): 293-315.
[7] 孙永祥, 黄祖辉. 上市公司的股权结构与绩效[J]. 经济研究, 1999, 12: 23-30, 39.
[8] 陈晓, 江东. 股权多元化、公司业绩与行业竞争性[J]. 经济研究, 2000, 8: 28-35.
[9] 陈小悦, 徐晓东. 股权结构、企业绩效与投资者利益保护[J]. 经济研究, 2001, 11: 3-11.
[10] 朱武祥, 宋勇. 股权结构与企业价值召寸家电行业上市公司实证分析[J]. 经济研究, 2001, 12: 66-72.
[11] J. R. Barro, R. J. Barro. Pay, performance, and turnover of bank CEOs. Journal of Labor Economics, 1990, 8(4): 448-481.
[12] R. Sloan. Accounting earning and top executive compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1993, 16(1-3): 55-100.
[13] B. J. Hall, J. B. Liebman. Are CEOS really paid like bureaucrats? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998, 113(3): 653-691.
[14] P. Duffhues, R. Kabir. Is the pay-performance relation always positive? Evidence from the Netherlands. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 2008, 18(1): 45-60.
[15] A. A. B. Bootsma. Pay-for-performance? 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/2105/6150
[16] 杜兴强, 王丽华. 高层管理当局薪酬与上市公司业绩的相关性实证研究[J]. 会计研究, 2007, 1: 58-65.
[17] 刘斌等. CEO薪酬与企业业绩互动效应的实证检验[J]. 会计研究, 2003, 3: 35-40.
[18] M. C. Jensen, K. J. Murphy. Performance pay and top management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98(2): 225- 264.
[19] G. L. H. Tian. State Shareholding and the values of China’s firms. Working Paper, London: London Business School, 2001.
[20] 朱武祥, 张帆. 企业上市以来的经营业绩实证分析[J]. 世界经济, 2001, 11.
[21] R. M. Stulz. Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economy, 1986, 20(1-2): 25-54.
[22] H. Demsetz, K. Lehn. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 1985, 93(6): 1155-1177.
[23] 李维安, 李汉军. 股权结构、高管持股与公司绩效——来自民营上市公司的证据[J]. 南开管理评论, 2006, 5: 4-10.
[24] 达摩达尔•N•古扎拉蒂. 计量经济学基础. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2005.

为你推荐