计算机环境下自我调节学习的测量
The Measurement of Self-Regulated Learning in Computer-Based Learning Environments
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2014.42034, PDF, HTML, 下载: 2,914  浏览: 8,392  科研立项经费支持
作者: 卢春晓, 龚少英, 袁 新：青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室，武汉;华中师范大学心理学院，武汉
关键词: 自我调节学习；出声思维；追踪日志；计算机学习环境；Self-Regulated Learning; Think-Aloud Protocol; Trace log; CBLEs
摘要: 自我调节学习是由学习者自主发起，通过对认知和元认知的调控以促进学习的过程，计算机环境下的自我调节学习也尤为必要。目前，关于自我调节学习的测量手段主要有两类：基于能力说的传统测量方法，主要包括问卷法和访谈法，把自我调节学习当作静态的能力进行测量；基于事件说的实时测量方法，主要包括出声思维、追踪日志等，把自我调节学习作为动态的事件进行测量。在未来的研究中可采用多种测量方式相结合，并将眼动技术应用于计算机环境下自我调节学习的研究中。
Abstract:

Self-regulated learning (SRL) is a learning process which is initiated by learners autonomously to promote learning, based on cognitive and metacognitive regulation. In the efficient study of environment established with the computer network information, the self-regulated learning has become the key factor to raise the study quality and efficiency. There are two main approaches to measuring self-regulated learning: the traditional method based on measuring aptitude, such as questionnaire and interview; the real-time method based on measuring events, such as think- aloud protocol, trace log. In the future, the combination of a variety of measurements and eye- tracking technique can be adapted to the researches of SRL in CBLEs.

文章引用：卢春晓, 龚少英, 袁新. 计算机环境下自我调节学习的测量[J]. 心理学进展, 2014, 4(2): 224-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2014.42034

参考文献

[1] 官群(2009). 自我调控学习: 研究背景、方法发展与未来展望. 心理科学, 2期, 394-396.
[2] 兰公瑞, 盖笑松(2011). 基于计算机学习环境下的自我调节学习. 外国教育研究, 38期, 29-33.
[3] 徐娟, 刘儒德(2009). 计算机环境下的自我调节学习研究. 中国电化教育, 267期, 37-40.
[4] 张锦坤, 白学军, 杨丽娴(2009). 国外关于“微观”自我调节学习的研究概述. 心理科学, 1期, 164-166.
[5] 周国韬(1995). 自我调节学习论——班杜拉学习理论的新进展. 外国教育研究, 3期, 1-3.
[6] Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199-209.
[7] Azevedo, R., Cromley, J.G., Moos, D.C., Greene, J.A., & Winters, F.I. (2011). Adaptive content and process scaffolding: A key to facilitating students’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53, 106-140.
[8] Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J.T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 87-111.
[9] Azevedo, R., Moos, D.C., Greene, J.A., Winters, F.I., & Cromley, J.G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 45-72.
[10] Ber-nacki, M.L., Byrnes, J.P., & Cromley, J.C. (2012). The effects of achievement goals and self-regulated learning behaviors on reading comprehension in technology-enhanced learning environments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 148-161.
[11] Boom, G.V.D., Paas, F., Jeroen, J.G., & Merriënboer, V. (2007). Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 17, 532-548.
[12] Greene, J.A., Bolick, C.M., & Robertson, J. (2010). Fostering historical knowledge and thinking skills using hypermedia learning environments: The role of self-regulated learning. Computers & Education, 54, 230-243.
[13] Hadwin, A.F., Nesbit, J.C., Jamieson-Noel, D., Code, J., & Winne, P.H. (2007). Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 107-124.
[14] Hadwin, A.F., Oshige, M., Gress, C.L.Z., & Winne, P.H. (2010). Innovative ways for using g study to orchestrate and research social aspects of self-regulated learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 794-805.
[15] Kosnin, A.M. (2007). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement in Malaysian undergraduates. International Education Journal, 8, 221-228.
[16] Kumar, V.S., Gress, C.L.Z., Hadwin, A.F., & Winne, P.H. (2010). Assessing process in CSCL: An ontological approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 825-834.
[17] Malmberg, J., Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2010). Tracing elementary school students’ study tactic use in g study by examining a strategic and self-regulated learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1034-1042.
[18] Moos, D.C. (2010). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: Too much of a good thing? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19, 59-77.
[19] Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008a). Monitoring, planning, and self-efficacy during learning with hypermedia: The impact of conceptual scaffolds. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1686-1706.
[20] Moos, D.C., & Azevedo, R. (2008b). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 270-298.
[21] Pintrich, P.R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544.
[22] Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MLSQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
[23] Azevedo, R., Cromley, J.G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344-370.
[24] Schraw, G. (2007). The use of computer-based environments for understanding and improving self-regulation. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 169-176.
[25] Schraw, G. (2010). Measuring self-regulation in computer-based learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 45, 258266.
[26] Tsai, M.-J., Hou, H.-T., Lai, M.-L., Liu, W.-Y., & Yang, F.-Y. (2012). Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 58, 375-385.
[27] Weinstein, C.E., Schulte, A.C., & Palmer, D.R. (1987). LASSI: Learning and study strategies inventory. Clearwater: H. & H.
[28] Winne, P.H. (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45, 267-276.
[29] Winne, P.H., Hadwin, A.F., & Gress, C. (2010). The learning kit project: Software tools for supporting and researching regulation of collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 787-793.
[30] Winne, P.H., Nesbit, J.C., Kumar, V., Hadwin, A.F., Lajoie, S.P., Azevedo., R., & Perry, N.E. (2006). Supporting self-regulated learning with g study software: The learning kit project. Technology Instruction Cognition and Learning, 3, 105.
[31] Winne, P.H., & Perry, N.E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.). Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp.532-566). Orlando: Academic Press.
[32] Winters, F.I., Greene, J.A., & Costich, C.M. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 429-444.
[33] Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-339.
[34] Zimmerman, B.J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166-183.
[35] Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing students’ use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.