任务性质对未来任务时间估计的影响及其理论机制
The Effects and Mechanism of Task Characters on the Estimation of Task Duration in the Future
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2015.510074, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 2,550  浏览: 14,705 
作者: 冯彦添, 黄希庭：西南大学心理学部，重庆
关键词: 任务性质；未来任务；时间估计；计划谬误；Task Characters； Task in the Future； Time Estimation； Planning Fallacy
摘要: 未来任务时间估计是指人们凭借记忆和经验对将要进行的任务所需要的时间进行判断的过程。人们对未来任务的时间估计会产生偏差，对其心理机制的解释主要包括计划谬误理论、记忆偏差理论和解释水平理论。任务性质(包括任务持续时间的长短、任务的复杂度和任务熟悉度等)会对未来任务的时间估计产生影响，各理论从不同角度阐释了任务性质对未来任务的时间估计的影响。未来研究需进一步探索任务性质与人格特质在影响未来任务时间估计背后的关系以及未来任务时间估计的脑机制。
Abstract: The estimation of task duration in the future refers to the process of judging the time taken to complete a task in the future with memory and experience. The estimation is biased, which has been mainly explained by planning fallacy theory, memory biased theory and construal level theory in the aspect of psychological mechanism. Task characters including task duration, task complexity and task familiarity has effects on the process, which has also been expounded by these three theories from different sides. The focus of future research should involve the relationship between task characters and personality traits in the process and the brain mechanism throughout the process.The estimation of task duration in the future refers to the process of judging the time taken to complete a task in the future with memory and experience. The estimation is biased, which has been mainly explained by planning fallacy theory, memory biased theory and construal level theory in the aspect of psychological mechanism. Task characters including task duration, task complexity and task familiarity have effects on the process, which have also been expounded by these three theories from different sides. The focus of future research should involve the relationship between task characters and personality traits in the process and the brain mechanism throughout the process.
文章引用：冯彦添, 黄希庭 (2015). 任务性质对未来任务时间估计的影响及其理论机制. 心理学进展, 5(10), 571-579. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2015.510074

参考文献

[1] 黄希庭(1994). 未来时间的心理结构. 心理学报, 2期, 121-127.
[2] 黄希庭(2014). 探究心理时间. 北京: 商务印书馆.
[3] 黄希庭, 邓麟, 张永红(2004). 回溯式时间记忆特点的实验研究. 心理与行为研究, 4期, 561-566.
[4] 黄希庭, 李伯约, 张志杰(2003). 时间认知分段综合模型的探讨. 西南师范大学学报: 人文社会科学版, 2期, 5-9.
[5] 李丹, 尹华站, 李祚山(2010). 时间解释水平理论研究述评. 重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 4期, 88-93.
[6] 钱白云, 苏倩倩, 郑全全(2011). 相似任务经验和未来时间充裕感对计划失误的影响. 应用心理学, 4期, 323-331.
[7] 滕召军, 刘衍玲, 刘勇, 翟瑞(2014). 乐观偏差的认知神经机制. 心理科学进展, 1期, 57-66.
[8] 夏凌翔, 陈姝莹(2012). 个人自立, 反馈对长时距估计的影响. 心理科学, 3期, 614-618.
[9] 王余娟, 张志杰, 邹增丽(2008). 时距估计长度效应的研究述评. 现代生物医学进展, 12期, 2542-2544.
[10] 尹华站, 李祚山, 李丹, 黄希庭(2010). 时距加工“长度效应”研究述评. 心理科学进展, 6期, 887-891.
[11] 张永红, 黄希庭(2005). 公众时间回溯式记忆的特点. 心理科学, 4期, 775-779.
[12] 郑秋强, 徐富明, 罗寒冰, 李彬, 张慧(2014). 判断与决策中的规划谬误. 心理科学进展, 3期, 482-491.
[13] Aschoff, J. (1998). Human perception of short and long time intervals: Its correlation with body temperature and the duration of wake time. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 13, 437-442.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074873098129000264
[14] Block, R. A., & Reed, M. A. (1978). Remembered duration: Evidence for a contextual-change hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 656-665.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.656
[15] Boltz, M. G., & Yum, Y. N. (2010). Temporal concepts and predicted duration judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 895-904.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.002
[16] Buehler, R., & Griffin, D. (2003). Planning, personality, and pre-diction: The role of future focus in optimistic time predictions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92, 80-90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00089-X
[17] Buehler, R., Griffin, D., Lam, K. C. H., & Deslauriers, J. (2012). Perspectives on prediction: Does third-person imagery improve task completion estimates? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 138-149.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.09.001
[18] Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Peetz, J. (2010). The planning fallacy: Cognitive, motivational, and social origins. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 1-62.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43001-4
[19] Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (1994). Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 366-381.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.366
[20] Buehler, R., Messervey, D., & Griffin, D. (2005). Collaborative planning and prediction: Does group discussion affect optimistic biases in time estimation? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 47-63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.02.004
[21] Buehler, R., Peetz, J., & Griffin, D. (2010). Finishing on time: When do predictions influence completion times? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111, 23-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.08.001
[22] Burt, C. D. B., & Kemp, S. (1994). Construction of activity du-ration and time management potential. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 155-168.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350080206
[23] Connolly, T., & Dean, D. (1997). Decomposed versus holistic esti-mates of effort required for software writing tasks. Management Science, 43, 1029-1045.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.7.1029
[24] Craik, F. I. M., & Hay, J. F. (1999). Aging and judgments of duration: Effects of task complexity and method of estimation. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 549-560.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03211972
[25] Forsyth, D. K., & Burt, C. D. B. (2008). Allocating time to future tasks: The effect of task segmentation on planning fallacy bias. Memory & Cognition, 36, 791-798.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.4.791
[26] Fraisse, P. (1984). Perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 1-37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.000245
[27] Francis-Smythe, J., & Robertson, I. (1999). Time-related individual differences. Time & Society, 8, 273-292.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961463X99008002004
[28] Griffin, D., & Buehler, R. (2005). Biases and fallacies, memories and predictions: Comment on Roy, Christenfeld, and McKenzie (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 757-760.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.757
[29] Halkjelsvik, T., & Jørgensen, M. (2012). From origami to soft-ware development: A review of studies on judgment-based predictions of performance time. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 238-271.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025996
[30] Hinds, P. J. (1999). The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on prediction of novice performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 205-221.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.5.2.205
[31] König, C. J., Wirz, A., Thomas, K. E., & Weidmann, R. (2012). The effects of previous misestimation of task duration on estimating future task duration. Current Psychology, 34, 1-13.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9236-3
[32] Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Science, 39, 17-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17
[33] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures: DTIC document. TIMS Studies in Management Science, 12, 313-327.
[34] Kanten, A. B. (2011). The effect of construal level on predictions of task duration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1037-1047.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.005
[35] Koole, S., & Spijker, M. (2000). Overcoming the planning fallacy through willpower: Effects of implementation intentions on actual and predicted task-completion times. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 873-888.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<873::AID-EJSP22>3.0.CO;2-U
[36] Kruger, J., & Evans, M. (2004). If you don’t want to be late, enumerate: Unpacking reduces the planning fallacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 586-598.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.001
[37] Lewis, P. A., & Miall, R. C. (2003). Dis-tinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: Evidence from neuroimaging. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 250-255.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00036-9
[38] Merchant, H., Harrington, D. L., & Meck, W. H. (2013). Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 36, 313-336.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170349
[39] Min, K. S., & Arkes, H. R. (2012). When is difficult planning good planning? The effects of scenario-based planning on optimistic prediction bias. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 2701-2729.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00958.x
[40] Peetz, J., Buehler, R., & Wilson, A. (2010). Planning for the near and distant future: How does temporal distance affect task completion predictions? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 709-720.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.008
[41] Pezzo, M. V., Litman, J. A., & Pezzo, S. P. (2006). On the distinc-tion between yuppies and hippies: Individual differences in prediction biases for planning future tasks. Personality and In-dividual Differences, 41, 1359-1371.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.029
[42] Pychyl, T. A., Morin, R. W., & Salmon, B. R. (2001). Procrastina-tion and the planning fallacy: An examination of the study habits of university students. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15, 135-150.
[43] Roy, M. M., & Christenfeld, N. J. S. (2007). Bias in memory predicts bias in estimation of future task duration. Memory & Cognition, 35, 557-564.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193294
[44] Roy, M. M., & Christenfeld, N. J. S. (2008). Effect of task length on remembered and predicted duration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 202-207.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.202
[45] Roy, M. M., Christenfeld, N. J. S., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (2005). Underestimating the duration of future events: Memory incorrectly used or memory bias? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 738-756.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.738
[46] Roy, M. M., M., Scott, T., & Christenfeld, N. J. S. (2008). Correcting memory improves accuracy of predicted task duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 266-275.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.14.3.266
[47] Sharot, T., Guitart-Masip, M., Korn, C. W., Chowdhury, R., & Dolan, R. J. (2012). How dopamine enhances an optimism bias in humans. Current Biology, 22, 1477-1481.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.053
[48] Sharot, T., Shiner, T., Brown, A. C., Fan, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2009). Dopamine enhances expectation of pleasure in humans. Current Biology, 19, 2077-2080.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.025
[49] Siddiqui, R. A., May, F., & Monga, A. (2014). Reversals of task duration estimates: Thinking how rather than why shrinks duration estimates for simple tasks, but elongates estimates for complex tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 184-189.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.002
[50] Thomas, K. E., Newstead, S. E., & Handley, S. J. (2003). Exploring the time prediction process: The effects of task experience and complexity on prediction accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 655-673.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.893
[51] Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403-421.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
[52] Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
[53] Weick, M., & Guinote, A. (2010). How long will it take? Power biases time predictions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 595-604.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.005
[54] Yan, J., Hou, S., & Unger, A. (2014). High construal level reduces overoptimistic performance prediction. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42, 1303-1313.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.8.1303