心理韧性对相对剥夺儿童社会支持的改善:基于弹性心理训练效果分析
Improvement of Social Support for Children with Relative Deprivation by Resilience Based on the Effect of Elastic Psychological Training
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2016.64057, PDF, HTML, XML,  被引量 下载: 2,418  浏览: 5,712  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 甄锋泉, 刘 颖, 黎光明, 蒋 欢, 梁正妍, 王幸君:华南师范大学心理学院、心理应用研究中心,广东 广州
关键词: 弹性心理训练相对剥夺感儿童心理韧性社会支持Elastic Psychological Training Relative Deprivation Children Resilience Social Support
摘要: 目的:通过弹性心理训练,考察相对剥夺儿童心理韧性对社会支持的改善效果。方法:使用相对剥夺感量表调查456名儿童,筛选出62名相对剥夺感较强的儿童,对他们进行弹性心理训练,比较训练前后的心理韧性和社会支持水平。结果:弹性心理训练前相对剥夺感高分组和低分组儿童在主观支持、客观支持、对支持的利用度和社会支持总分上均有显著性差异(p < 0.001)。在接受弹性心理训练后,心理韧性量表的坚韧、力量和乐观均有所提高,并且训练前后的得分有显著性差异(p < 0.001或p < 0.01),在主观支持、客观支持、对支持的利用度和社会支持总分上有显著性提高(p < 0.001)。结论:弹性心理训练对相对剥夺儿童社会支持的改善起到了较好效果。
Abstract: Objective: To study impacts of resilience for children with relative deprivation on social support through elastic psychological training. Methods: Personal relative deprivation scale was used to investigate 456 children and compare their results. There were 62 children who had serious rela-tive deprivation and needed be done the resilience education practice. Then we compare the result of social support and resilience before and after doing it. Results: Before elastic psychological training, there are significant differences for subjective support, objective support, utilization support and total scores between serious and slight relative deprivation children (p < 0.001). After implementing elastic psychological training, tenacity, strength and optimism of CD-RISC are improved and have a clear significance between the scores of the training (p < 0.001 or p < 0.01). There is significant increase for subjective support, objective support, utilization support and total scores between serious and slight relative deprivation adolescent (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Elastic psychological training is an effective approach to improve social support of children who have a high relative deprivation.
文章引用:甄锋泉, 刘颖, 黎光明, 蒋欢, 梁正妍, 王幸君 (2016). 心理韧性对相对剥夺儿童社会支持的改善:基于弹性心理训练效果分析. 心理学进展, 6(4), 431-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2016.64057

参考文献

[1] 郭晓红(2012). 转型期弱势群体的相对剥夺感与犯罪. 江西社会科学, (9), 236-240.
[2] 蓝李焰(2012). 贫困大学生社会支持: 问题与对策. 宿州教育学院学报, 15(3), 20-21.
[3] 李强(1998). 社会支持与个体心理健康. 天津社会科学, (1), 1998: 67-70.
[4] 彭李(2012). 不同心理弹性大学生的心理健康与认知偏向特点及心理弹性训练的影响研究. 博士论文, 第三军医大学, 重庆.
[5] 杨艳(2015). 心理弹性训练对高校贫困生心理健康的影响. 中国学校卫生, 36(2), 295-297.
[6] 于阳(2014). 社会支持视域下城市流动人口犯罪预防研究. 河北法学, 32(5), 121-129.
[7] 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘(1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版). 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 127-131
[8] 曾红, 范云, 黎光明,黄文庚(2015). 弹性心理训练对农业院校大学生相对剥夺感效果分析. 中国学校卫生, (11), 1669- 1671.
[9] Callan, M. J., Ellard, J. H., Will, S. N., & Hodgins, D. C. (2008). Gambling as a Search for Justice: Examining the Role of Personal Relative Deprivation in Gambling Urges and Gambling Behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1514-1529.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167208322956
[10] Cogan, J. C. (2004). The Other 3R’s: Reasoning, Resilience, and Responsibility. http://www.apa.org/ed/cpse/threershome.html
[11] Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a New Resilience Scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression & Anxiety, 18, 76-82.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/da.10113
[12] Davis, J. A. (1959). A Formal Interpretation of the Theory of Relative De-privation. Sociometry, 22, 280-296.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786046
[13] Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2012). Crime: Social Disorganization and Relative Deprivation. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 719-731.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00400-6
[14] Sood, A., Prasad, K., Schroeder, D., & Varkey, P. (2011). Stress Management and Resilience Training among Department of Medicine Faculty: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26, 858-861.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1640-x
[15] Waite, P. J., & Richardson, G. E. (2004). Determining the Efficacy of Resiliency Training in the Work Site. Journal of Allied Health, 33, 178-183.
[16] Yu X. N., & Zhang J. X. (2007). Factor Analysis and Psychometric Evaluation with Chinese People. Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 19-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.1.19