对调节聚焦理论及其与风险追求的关系的回顾
A Review of Regulatory Focus Theory and the Relationship with Risk Preference
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2016.64069, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 2,334  浏览: 7,436 
作者: 董丽娟:苏州大学教育学院,江苏 苏州
关键词: 调节聚焦理论促进聚焦防御聚焦风险追求Regulatory Focus Theory Promotion Focus Prevention Focus Risk Preference
摘要: 本文主要是对调节聚焦理论进行梳理、对调节聚焦的测量和运用领域进行归纳,并在此基础上,总结了调节聚焦与风险追求的关系,为调节聚焦理论的进一步发展和有关学者进行研究提供了借鉴意义。
Abstract: This paper is mainly to review the regulatory focus theory, to summarize the measurement and application fields of regulatory focus, then to integrate the relationship of regulatory focus and risk preference, which provides a reference for the further development of regulatory focus theory and for relevant researchers.
文章引用:董丽娟 (2016). 对调节聚焦理论及其与风险追求的关系的回顾. 心理学进展, 6(4), 519-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2016.64069

参考文献

[1] 许雷平, 杭虹利, 王方华(2012). 长期倾向调节聚焦量表述评[J]. 心理科学, 35(1), 213-219.
[2] Brockner, J., & Hig-gins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory Focus Theory: Implications for the Study of Emotions at Work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 35-66.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2972
[3] Brodscholl, J. C., Kober, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2007). Strategies of Self-Regulation in Goal Attainment versus Goal Maintenance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 628-648.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.380
[4] Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision- Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
[5] De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M., van Dijke, M., Schouten, B. C., & Bardes, M. (2009). When Does Self-Sacrificial Leadership Motivate Prosocial Behavior? It Depends on Followers’ Pre-vention Focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 887-899.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014782
[6] Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The Effects of Promotion and Pre-vention Cues on Creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001
[7] Higgins, E. T., Bond, R. N., Klein, R., & Strauman, T. (1986). Self-Discrepancies and Emotional Vulnerability: How Magnitude, Accessibility, and Type of Discrepancy Influence Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 5-15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.5
[8] Higgins, E. T., Roney, C., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus Ought Predilections for Approach and Avoidance: Distinct Self-Regulatory Systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276-286.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.276
[9] Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional Res-ponses to Goal Attainment: Strength of Regulatory Focus as Moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515-525.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.515
[10] Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a Good Decision: Value from Fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1217
[11] Higgins, E. T. (2009). Regulatory Fit in the Goal-Pursuit Process. In G. B. Moskowitz, & H. Grant (Eds.), The Psychology of Goals (pp. 505-533). New York: Guilford Press.
[12] Johnson, R. E., Chang, C.-H., & Yang, L.-Q. (2010). Commitment and Motivation at Work: The Relevance of Employee Identity and Regulatory Focus. Academy of Management Review, 35, 226-245.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.48463332
[13] Klein, W. M. P., & Cerully, J. L. (2007). Health-Related Risk Perception and Decision-Making: Lessons from the Study of Motives in Social Psychology. Social and Personality Psy-chology Compass, 1, 334-358.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00023.x
[14] Lanaj, K., Chang, C. H., & Johnson, R. E. (2012). Regula-tory Focus and Work-Related Outcomes: A Review and Meta- Analysis. American Psychological Association, 138, 998-1034.
[15] Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by Positive or Negative Role Models: Regulatory Focus Determines Who Will Best Inspire Us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854-864.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854
[16] Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., Camacho, C. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1999). Promotion and Prevention Choices between Stability and Change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1135-1145.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1135
[17] Reyna, V. F. (2004). How People Make Decisions That Involve Risk. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 60- 66.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00275.x
[18] Schneider, S. L., & Lopes, L. L. (1986). Reflection in Pre-ferences under Risk: Who and When May Suggest Why. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 535-548.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.12.4.535
[19] Scholer, A. A., & Higgins, E. T. (2008). Distinguishing Levels of Approach and Avoidance: An Analysis Using Regulatory Focus Theory. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation (pp. 489-504). New York: Psychology Press.
[20] Scholer, A. A., Stroessner, S. J., & Higgins, E. T. (2008). Responding to Negativity: How a Risky Tactic Can Serve a Vigilant Strategy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 767-774.
[21] Tory Higgins, E. (2010). Regulatory Focus Theory. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[22] Wallace, J. C., Johnson, P. D., & Frazier, M. L. (2009). An Examination of the Factorial, Construct, and Predictive Validity and Utility of the Regulatory Focus at Work Scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 805-831.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.572
[23] Wallace, J. C., & Chen, G. (2006). A Multilevel Integration of Personality, Climate, Self-Regulation, and Performance. Personnel Psychology, 59, 529-557.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00046.x