乘坡河流域洪水预报模型比较研究
Comparative Study of Flood Forecasting Models at Chengpo River Basin
DOI: 10.12677/JWRR.2017.61008, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,671  浏览: 3,865  科研立项经费支持
作者: 姚亦周, 赵旭升, 范光伟:珠江水利委员会珠江水利科学研究院,广东 广州;徐 爽:珠江水利委员会,广东 广州
关键词: 山洪洪水预报新安江模型TOPMODELFlash Flood Flood Forecasting Xinanjiang Model TOPMODEL
摘要: 中小流域山洪资料积累较少,洪水预报方案编制困难。针对该问题,以南方湿润地区海南乘坡河流域为例,选取以蓄满产流为基础的集总式新安江模型和分布式TOPMODEL模型开展洪水模拟研究。结果表明,对于海南湿润地区,新安江模型和TOPMODEL模型产汇流模拟效果都较好,均可用于指导中小流域进行洪水预报预警。但相对而言,前期土壤较为湿润时,新安江模型的模拟效果较好;对于大洪水及时间序列较长的洪水而言,TOPMODEL模型的模拟效果较好。
Abstract: The accumulation of flash floods is low and the preparation of flood forecasting schemes is difficult. To address this issue, we take the Chengpo river basin in Hainan, one of the humid areas in south part of China. The lumped Xinanjiang model based on the runoff generation and the distributed TOPMODEL model were selected for flood simulation. The results of both models are good for humid regions in Hainan. These two models can be used to guide the small and medium-sized river basin for flood forecasting and early warning. Generally speaking, Xinanjiang model is more accurate when the pre-soil is wetter; the TOPMODEL model performs better for the larger flood events.
文章引用:姚亦周, 徐爽, 赵旭升, 范光伟. 乘坡河流域洪水预报模型比较研究[J]. 水资源研究, 2017, 6(1): 55-65. https://doi.org/10.12677/JWRR.2017.61008

参考文献

[1] 王佩兰, 赵人俊. 新安江模型(三水源)参数的检验[J]. 河海大学学报, 1989(4): 16-20. WANG Peilan, ZHAO Renjun. The parameters test of Xinanjiang model. Journal of Hohai University, 1989(4): 16-20. (in Chinese)
[2] BEVEN, K. J., KIRKBY, M. J. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology/Un modèle à base physique de zone d’appel variable de l’hydrologie du bassin versant. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 1979, 24(1): 43-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667909491834
[3] DENG, H. P., SUN, S. F. Incorporation of TOPMODEL into landsurface model SSiB and numerically testing the effects of the corporation at basinscale. Science China Earth Sciences, 2012: 5510.
[4] SANTOS, I., KOBIYAMA, M. Determination of saturated areas using TOPMODEL in the pequeno river wa-tershed, Southern Brazil (pt). Ambientee Água: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Science, 2008: 32.
[5] SHAMAN, J., STIEGLITZ, M., ENGEL, V., KOSTER, R. and STARK, C. Representation of subsurface stormflow and a more responsive watertable in a TOPMODEL-based hydrology model. Water Resources Research, 2002: 388.
[6] 王敏, 张立明, 马秀梅. 小流域洪水分析[J]. 内蒙古水利, 2012(6): 34. WANG Min, ZHANG Liming and MA Xiumei. The analysis of small watershed flood. Inner Mongolia, 2012(6): 34. (in Chinese)
[7] 刘金涛, 等. 新安江模型理论研究的进展与探讨[J]. 水文, 2014(1). LIU Jintao, et al. Coupling the progress and discussion about the theory of Xinanjiang Model. Hydrology, 2014(1). (in Chinese)
[8] 阚光远, 等. 新安江产流模型与改进的BP汇流模型耦合应用[J]. 水科学进展, 2012(1). QUE Guangyuan, et al. Coupling Xinanjiang runoff generation model with improved BP flow concentration model. Advances in Water Science, 2012(1). (in Chinese)
[9] 李致家, 孔祥光, 张初旺. 对新安江模型的改进[J]. 水文, 1998(4). LI Zhijia, KONG Xiangguang and ZHANG Chuwang. The improvement of Xinanjiang model. Hydrology, 1998(4). (in Chinese)