权力的概念隐喻及加工机制
Metaphors about Power and Its Mechanism
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2017.75086, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,656  浏览: 3,786 
作者: 陈欧童：曲阜师范大学，山东 济宁
关键词: 概念隐喻；权力；具身认知；Metaphor； Power； Embodiment
摘要: 概念隐喻现象一直是语言学与具身认知心理学的重要研究对象，权力作为一种抽象概念，具身认知领域近年来也开始予以关注，研究主要涉及了权力空间属性的隐喻，如大和小、上和下、轻和重，还包括不同颜色与权力的隐喻联结，并着眼于利用ERP等技术手段探讨权力这一抽象概念的表征及作用机制。未来研究在丰富、验证权力隐喻已证实物理属性的基础上，需致力于探讨权力多种隐喻间的交互作用，以此揭示并拓展权力隐喻的更多应用价值。
Abstract: Metaphor is an important part in both linguistics and psychology. Power, as an abstract, is also an important part in metaphor, and psychologists have been studied a lot recent years. These studies mainly involves in metaphors between power and physical factors, such as mechanically big and small, vertically up and down, light and heavy in weight, and also about colors. Following studies should focus more on multiple metaphors between power and other factors, or the bidirectional relation between power and physical factors. Recently, researches based on ERP also provided strong evidences to support this hypothesis. In future, researchers should pay more attention to multiple interactive affects that physical factors effect on power, and discover more application values.
文章引用：陈欧童 (2017). 权力的概念隐喻及加工机制. 心理学进展, 7(5), 698-707. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2017.75086

参考文献

[1] 陈思思, 克燕南, 蒋奖, 肖潇(2014). 权力概念的垂直方位空间隐喻对权力判断的影响. 心理科学(2), 388-393.
[2] 邓棉林(2013). 权力的上下和大小隐喻及表征关系. 硕士论文, 华东师范大学, 上海.
[3] 董丽星(2015). 权力概念的垂直空间隐喻及对垂直距离判断偏差的影响. 硕士论文, 鲁东大学, 烟台.
[4] 管延华, 迟毓凯, 戴金浩(2014). 权力对风险决策偏好的影响. 心理研究, 7(4), 42-47.
[5] 唐佩佩, 叶浩生, 杜建政(2015). 权力概念与空间大小: 具身隐喻的视角. 心理学报, 47(4), 514-521.
[6] 武向慈, 王恩国(2014). 权力概念加工对视觉空间注意定向的影响: 一个ERP证据. 心理学报, 46(12), 1871-1879.
[7] 武悦, 王爱平, 蒋奖, 古丽扎∙伯克力(2013). 启动任务中重量与权力的关系. 心理学探新, 33(2), 168-174.
[8] 许文娟(2013). 权力相关词语的判断: 大小效应及其可控性. 硕士论文, 湖南师范大学, 长沙.
[9] 杨惠兰, 何先友, 赵雪汝, 张维(2015). 权力的概念隐喻表征: 来自大小与颜色隐喻的证据. 心理学报, 47(7), 939-949.
[10] 殷融, 叶浩生(2014). 道德概念的黑白隐喻表征及其对道德认知的影响. 心理学报, (9), 1331-1346.
[11] 喻中(2003). 权力的起源: 一个比较法文化的考察. 现代法学, 25(1), 29-35.
[12] Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x99002149
[13] Brown, D. (1996). The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science (pp. 275-277). London: Thames & Hudson.
[14] Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, Time, Semantics, and the Child 1. In Cognitive Development & Acquisition of Language (pp. 27-63).
[15] Duguid, M. M., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). Living Large: The Powerful Overestimate Their Own Height. Psychological Science, 23, 36-40.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611422915
[16] Felson, R. B. (2002). Violence and Gender Reexamined. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 23, 165-185.
[17] Fiske, A. P. (2004). Four Modes of Constituting Relationships: Consubstantial Assimilation; Space, Magnitude, Time, and Force; Concrete Procedures; Abstract Symbolism. In N. Haslam (Ed.), Relational Models Theory. A Contemporary Overview (pp. 61-146). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[18] Freedman, D. G. (2009). Human Sociobiology: A Holistic Approach. Papers Revista De Sociologia.
[19] Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From Power to Action. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
[20] Gentner, D., & Goldin, S. (2008). Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. Functional Neurology, 23, 109-112.
[21] Giessner, S. R., & Schubert, T. W. (2007). High in the Hierarchy: How Vertical Location and Judgments of Leaders' Power Are Interrelated. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 104, 30-44.
[22] Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (2004). The Effect of Physical Height on Workplace Success and Income: Preliminary Test of a Theoretical Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 428-441.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.428
[23] Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, Approach, and Inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265- 284.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265
[24] Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism, 19, 75-96.
[25] Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P., & Keefer, L. A. (2010). A Meta-phor-Enriched Social Cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1045-1067.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020970
[26] Lee, E. H., & Schnall, S. (2014). The Influence of Social Power on Weight Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 143, 1719-1725.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035699
[27] Louwerse, M. M. (2011). Symbol Interdependency in Symbolic and Embodied Cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 273-302.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01106.x
[28] Reddy, M. J. (1979). The Conduit Metaphor—A Case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language. A Ortony Metaphor & Thinking.
[29] Schubert, T. W., Waldzus, S., & Giessner, S. R. (2009). Control over the Association of Power and Size. Social Cognition, 27, 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.1.1
[30] Zanolie, K., Dantzig, S. V., Boot, I., Wijnen, J., Schubert, T. W., Giessner, S. R. et al. (2012). Mighty Metaphors: Behavioral and ERP Evidence That Power Shifts Attention on a Vertical Dimension. Brain & Cognition, 78, 50-58.
[31] Zhang, E., Luo, J., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Zhong, J., & Li, Q. (2013). Neural Mechanisms of Shifts of Spatial Attention Induced by Object Words with Spatial Associations: An ERP Study. Experimental Brain Research, 227, 199-209.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3500-x