论后宗教时代的文学道德教化功能
Moralizing Function of Literature in Post-Religious Era
DOI: 10.12677/WLS.2017.53012, PDF, HTML, XML,   
作者: 李 娜:北京语言大学,北京
关键词: 后宗教文学道德教化道德伦理Post-Religion Literature Moral Education Morality
摘要: 在后宗教时代,宗教对道德的影响明显弱化,它已变得世俗化,人类的宗教信仰迷失,导致道德上的无所适从。文学自古以来就具有道德教化功能,后宗教时代文学道德教化的发挥关乎人类信仰的建构和社会的和谐稳定,作家和批评家应主动承担起社会道德教化责任。但文学不是政治的附庸,不是说教的工具,它应该从审美的角度进行潜移默化的教育。在强调文学道德教化功能的同时,不能一味夸大其功能而走向极端。
Abstract: In the post-religious era, the moral influence of religious ethics declines significantly. With the secularization of religion, human beings gradually lose their moral belief. Literature is an impor-tant means of moral education ever since its emergence, and its function of moral education in the post-religious era matters a lot to the construction of human belief as well as to social harmony and stability. Writers and literary critics should take the initiative and responsibility of social moralization. Literature is neither the appendage of politics, nor the apparent dull preaching; its educational influence should be exerted subtly from its aesthetical aspect. While the moralizing function of literature is emphasized, it cannot be exaggerated to the extreme.
文章引用:李娜. 论后宗教时代的文学道德教化功能[J]. 世界文学研究, 2017, 5(3): 81-88. https://doi.org/10.12677/WLS.2017.53012

参考文献

[1] 康健. 后宗教时代还有宗教伦理存在吗——关于其存在与特殊性质的简要分析[J]. 中国党政干部论坛, 2000(11): 41-43.
[2] 康健. 世俗化进程与后宗教时代的来临[J]. 中央社会主义学院学报, 2001(12): 49-52.
[3] 侯惠勤. 信仰弱化的积极回应——评黄明理博士“社会主义道德信仰论” [J]. 伦理学研究, 2006(6): 106.
[4] 石雅芳. 后宗教语境下阅读诺曼•梅勒[J]. 作家, 2008(24): 147-148.
[5] Berry, P. (2004) Postmodernism and Post-Religion. In: Connor, S., Ed., The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 168-181.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521640520.009
[6] Houtman, D. and Aupers, S. (2007) The Spiritual Turn and the Decline of Tradition: The Spread of Post-Christian Spirituality in 14 Western Countries, 1981-2000. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46, 305-320.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00360.x
[7] 西美尔. 现代人与宗教[M]. 第2版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2005: 38-39.
[8] Eagleton, T. (2012) The Event of Literature. Yale University Press, New Haven.
[9] Kosmin, B.A. and Keysar, A. (2009) American Religious Identification Survey (ARIS 2008). Trinity College, Hartford.
[10] 郭长刚, 张凤梅. 多元视域下的宗教观念评析[J]. 世界宗教研究, 2012(2): 1-9.
[11] Gill, R., Hadaway, C.K. and Marler, P.L. (1998) Is Religious Belief Declining in Britain? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 507-516.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1388057
[12] Bruce, S. (1995) Religion in Modern Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[13] Bruce, S. (2000) Mainstream Churches RIP. Sociology of Religion Study Group, University of Exeter, Exeter.
[14] 王秀哲. 政教关系的全球考察[J]. 环球法律评论, 2012, 34(4): 9-25.
[15] Houtman, D., Aupers, S. and Heelas, P. (2009) Christian Religiosity and New Age Spirituality: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48, 169-179.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01435_2.x
[16] 马晓军. 宗教世俗化的表现及其社会意义[J]. 前沿, 2009(3): 79-82.
[17] 周来顺. 文化危机与双重救赎——齐美尔视域中的现代性危机理论研究[J]. 学海, 2013(2): 154-162.
[18] 柏拉图. 文艺对话集[M]. 北京: 人民文学出版社, 1963.
[19] 伍蠡甫. 西方文论选(上卷)[M]//亚里士多德. 诗学. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 1962.
[20] 亚里斯多德, 贺拉斯, 罗念生, 杨周翰. 诗学–诗艺[M]//贺拉斯. 诗艺. 北京: 人民文学出版社, 1962.
[21] 莎士比亚. 莎士比亚全集[M]. 北京: 中国广播电视出版社, 1998.
[22] 聂珍钊. 文学伦理学批评: 论文学的基本功能与核心价值[J]. 外国文学研究, 2014, 36(4): 8-13.
[23] 聂珍钊. 文学伦理学批评导论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2014.
[24] 桫椤. 文学品质与马斯洛需求层次理论[J]. 山海经: 故事, 2015(2): 31-32.
[25] 伊格尔顿. 二十世纪西方文学理论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007.
[26] Eagleton, T. (2011) Literary Theory: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, New York.