化工安全评价的剖析与初探
Analysis and Exploration of Safety Evaluation in Chemical Industry
DOI: 10.12677/HJCET.2017.75027, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,716  浏览: 4,116  科研立项经费支持
作者: 程书鹏, 闫志国, 李 倩, 殷 霞:武汉工程大学,绿色化工过程省部共建教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉
关键词: 安全评价化学工业危险源Safety Evaluation Chemical Industry Hazard Sources
摘要: 安全问题一直是制约化工发展的重要因素,为了从根本上阻止化工安全事故的发生,就必须对化学工业进行安全评价。化工安全评价是一个复杂、严谨的过程,为了使人们能够清晰地理解安全评价,并且准确地选择、运用安全评价方法,本文筛选出七种在化工领域广泛应用的安全评价方法,并对其进行详细的分析与总结:1) 将其分为定性、定量和混合评价法三类,全面地总结其优缺点、适用范围,并结合安全评价方法选择的五项原则对这些方法的选择进行了详细的阐述;2) 对安全评价过程进行详细地剖析,并将这七种安全评价方法在评价过程中发挥的作用进行明确地表述,以促进对安全评价方法的运用。在基础上,本文收集并选取了2010~2016年发生在我国的121例典型化工事故,并对事故原因(即危险源)及比重进行详细地分析与统计,结果发现:违章操作、设备故障、工艺缺陷、意外因素、管理漏洞是化学工业安全事故的五大危险源,将这五类危险源作为七种安全评价方法的评价对象,对其进行具体地应用划分,以加深对化工安全评价的认识。
Abstract: Security issues have been an important factor which restricts the development of chemical industry. In order to fundamentally prevent the occurrence of chemical industry safety accidents, it is necessary to carry out safety evaluation of the chemical industry. Chemical industry safety evaluation is a complex and rigorous process, in order to enable people to clearly understand the safety evaluation, accurately choose and use safety evaluation methods, this paper selects seven safety evaluation methods widely used in chemical industry, and analyzes and summarizes them in detail: 1) they are classified into three categories: qualitative, quantitative and hybrid methods, and their advantages, disadvantages and application scope are summarized comprehensively. And the selection of these methods is elaborated in combination with the five principles of safety evaluation; 2) the safety evaluation process is analyzed in detail and the roles of the seven safety evaluation methods in the evaluation process are clearly expressed to promote the application of the safety evaluation method. On the basis of the above, this paper collects and selects 121 typical chemical accidents in China from 2010 to 2016, and analyzes and summarizes the accident causes (hazard sources) and the proportion. The results showed that the illegal operation, equipment failure, defects of process defects, accidental factors and management loopholes are the five dangerous sources of chemical industry safety accidents. These five types of hazard sources are used as the evaluation objects of seven safety evaluation methods, and their application is divided into three parts to deepen the understanding of chemical safety evaluation.
文章引用:程书鹏, 闫志国, 李倩, 殷霞. 化工安全评价的剖析与初探[J]. 化学工程与技术, 2017, 7(5): 179-187. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCET.2017.75027

参考文献

[1] Woodruf, J.M. (2005) Consequence and Likelihood in Risk Estimation: A Matter of Balance in UK Health and Safety Risk Assessment Practice. Safety Science, 43, 345-353.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2005.07.003
[2] Reniers, G.L.L., Dullaert, W., Ale, B.J.M., et al. (2005) Developing an External Domino Accident Prevention Framework: Hazwim. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 18, 127-138.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2005.03.002
[3] Van Duijne, F.H., Van Aken, D. and Schouten, E.G. (2008) Considerations in Developing Complete and Quantified Methods for Risk Assessment. Safety Science, 46, 245-254.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.05.003
[4] Marhavilas, P.K. and Koulouriotis, D.E. (2008) A Risk-Estimation Methodological Framework Using Quantitative Assessment Techniques and Real Accidents’ Data: Application in an Aluminum Extrusion Industry. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 21, 596-603.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2008.04.009
[5] Sivapirakasham, S.P., Thiyagarajan, S., Bineesh, P., et al. (2014) Hazard Identification in Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) Process Using What-If Analysis. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 592-594, 2508-2512.
[6] Baybutt, P. (2015) A Critique of the Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) Study. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 33, 52-58.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2014.11.010
[7] 王秀军, 陶辉. HAZOP分析方法在石油化工生产装置中的应用[J]. 安全、健康和环境, 2005, 5(2): 6-9.
[8] Khakzad, N., Khan, F. and Amyotte, P. (2011) Safety Analysis in Process Facilities: Comparison of Fault Tree and Bayesian Network Approaches. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96, 925-932.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.03.012
[9] Markowski, A.S. and Mannan, M.S. (2008) Fuzzy Risk Matrix. Hazard Mater, 159, 152-157.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.055
[10] Marhavilas, P.K., Koulouriotis, D. and Gemeni, V. (2011) Risk Analysis and Assessment Methodologies in the Work Sites: On a Review, Classification and Comparative Study of the Scientific Literature of the Period 2000-2009. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 24, 477-523.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.03.004
[11] Gupta, J.P., Khemani, G. and Sam Mannan, M. (2003) Calculation of Fire and Explosion Index (F&EI) Value for the Dow Guide Taking Credit for the Loss Control Measures. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 16, 235-241.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-4230(03)00044-5
[12] 郑贤斌, 李自力. DOW火灾爆炸指数评价法在油库中的应用[J]. 油气储运, 2003, 22(5): 49-52+61-66.
[13] 佟瑞鹏, 李桂君, 于春雨. 常用安全评价方法及其应用[M]. 北京: 中国劳动社会保障出版社, 2011.
[14] 吉尚伟, 张耀伟. 道化学火灾、爆炸指数分析法在油库安全评价中的应用[J]. 辽宁化工, 2009, 38(7): 503-506.
[15] Zhang, K., Duan, M., Luo, X., et al. (2017) A Fuzzy Risk Matrix Method and Its Application to the Installation Operation of Subsea Collet Connector. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 45, 147-159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2016.11.014
[16] Marhavilas, P.K. and Koulouriotis, D.E. (2012) Developing a New Alternative Risk Assessment Framework in the Work Sites by Including a Stochastic and a Deterministic Process: A Case Study for the Greek Public Electric Power Provider. Safety Science, 50, 448-462.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.10.006
[17] Zheng, X. and Liu, M. (2009) An Overview of Accident Fore-casting Methodologies. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22, 484-491.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2009.03.005
[18] Tixier, J., Dusserre, G., Salvi, O., et al. (2002) Review of 62 Risk Analysis Methodologies of Industrial Plants. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 15, 291-303.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-4230(02)00008-6
[19] Hammer, W. (1972) Handbook of System and Product Safety. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River.
[20] 张跃兵, 王凯, 王志亮. 危险源理论研究及在事故预防中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(6): 10-16.