几种覆盖方式对苹果树体营养及土壤微生物的影响
Effects of Different Mulching Ways on Apple Tree Nutrition and Soil Microbe
DOI: 10.12677/HJAS.2017.76051, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,456  浏览: 2,489 
作者: 王荣莉*, 曹欣冉, 安贵阳：西北农林科技大学园艺学院，陕西 杨凌
关键词: 果园覆盖；光合特性；土壤微生物；Orchard Mulching； Photosynthetic Indexes； Soil Microbe
摘要: 本试验通过连续3a对旱地苹果园地布、秸秆、黑膜3种树盘覆盖处理及清耕对照，研究不同覆盖方式对苹果叶片、枝条营养状况及叶片光合特性、土壤微生物的影响。结果表明，覆盖处理提高叶片及枝条全氮、全磷、全钾、总糖、还原糖含量，但淀粉含量降低；除可溶性蛋白外，其余指标含量叶片大于枝条。叶片净光合速率(Pn)、气孔导度(Gs)、蒸腾速率(Tr)表现为地布 > 地膜 > 秸秆 > 清耕，胞间CO2浓度(Ci)表现相反趋势。秸秆和地布覆盖显著增加土壤微生物数量，地布覆盖叶片净光合速率显著高于秸秆和黑地膜覆盖，较对照提高17.1%。在旱地果园，采用地布覆盖开沟施肥区域，形成两边高、中间低的凹形，具有集雨作用，是一种肥水高效利用的覆盖方式，能够明显促进树体营养生长。
Abstract: The experiment has been done on the effects of different mulching ways on apple leaves and branches nutritional status and leaf photosynthetic characteristics and soil microbe through a continuous 3a cloth, straw, black film mulching and tillage in dryland apple orchard .The results showed that covering treatment increased the leaves and branches total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total potassium, total sugar, reducing sugar content, but decreased starch content; except soluble protein, the content of other indexes in leaves is more than in branches. Net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomata conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr) showed trend of cloth > film > straw > tillage, and CO2 concentration intercellular (Ci) showed the opposite trend. Straw and cloth cover increased the soil microbes significantly; leaf photosynthesis of cloth cover was significantly higher than straw and black mulching. In dryland orchards, cloth covered ditching and fertilization region, formed concave with both sides of high, middle, low, can gather rainfall, and is a high coefficient cover measure of water and fertilization utilization, promoting tree grows significantly.
文章引用：王荣莉, 曹欣冉, 安贵阳. 几种覆盖方式对苹果树体营养及土壤微生物的影响[J]. 农业科学, 2017, 7(6): 396-403. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJAS.2017.76051

参考文献

[1] 翟衡, 史大川, 束怀瑞. 我国苹果产业发展现状与趋势[J]. 果树学报, 2007, 24(3): 355-360.
[2] Dario, S., Roberto, J.Z., Ronald, L.P., et al. (2009) Organic Orchard Floor Management Systems for Apple: Effect on Rootstock Performance in the Midwestern United States. Hort Science, 44, 263-267.
[3] 张义, 谢永生, 郝明德, 等. 不同地表覆盖方式对苹果园土壤性状及果树生长和产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(2): 279-286.
[4] 张林森, 刘福庭, 张永旺, 等. 不同覆盖方式对黄土高原地区苹果园土壤有机碳组分及微生物的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(15): 3180-3190.
[5] 张宗舟, 蔺海明, 等. 白水江自然保护区土壤霉菌数量及物种多样性分析[J]. 甘肃农业大学报, 2006, 41(5): 100-104.
[6] Singh, S., Sharma, A. and Srivastava, K. (2005) Response of Mulches and Antitranspirants on Moisture Conservation Yield and Quality of Apple Borkh cv Red Delicious under Rain Fed Conditions of Kashmir Valley. Environment and Ecology, 23, 572-576.
[7] 赵德英. 梨树树盘覆盖的土壤生态及树体生理响应研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2013: 95.
[8] 于强波, 李亚东, 苏丹, 等. 地面覆盖对越橘菌根侵染率及根系活力和过氧化物酶活性的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2009, 40(2): 28-30.
[9] 李敏敏. 渭北黄土高原苹果树覆盖和节水灌溉对土壤水分、果树生长和结果的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 陕西: 西北农林科技大学, 2012: 4-6.
[10] Neilsen, G., Hogue, J., Forge, T., Neilsen, D. and Kuchta, S. (2007) Nutritional Implications of Bio Solids and Paper Mulch Applications in High Density Apple Orchards. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 87, 551-558.
https://doi.org/10.4141/CJPS06037
[11] 卫宁宁. 保水剂和覆膜处理对苹果园土壤特性及树体生长的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 陕西: 西北农林科技大学, 2015: 27-28.
[12] 高维常, 胡伟, 林叶春, 等. 半膜覆盖栽培对烤烟生长发育的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2015(1): 13-18.
[13] 张义, 谢永生, 郝明德, 等. 地表覆盖及生理生态因子对苹果树光合特性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2010, 30(1): 125-130.
[14] 侯晓杰, 汪景宽, 李世朋. 不同施肥处理与地膜覆盖对土壤微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(2): 655-661.
[15] 李元, 牛文全, 张明智, 等. 加气灌溉对大棚甜瓜土壤酶活性与微生物数量的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2015, 46(8): 121-129.
[16] 王荣莉, 王倩, 曹欣冉. 不同覆盖方式对土壤物理性状和苹果叶片的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2015(24): 163-166.
[17] 任岩岩, 武继承. 保水剂对土壤性质及土壤微生物的影响研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学, 2009, 38(4): 13-15.

为你推荐