社会性高趋近积极情绪调节认知控制：对稳定性的增强作用
Social High Approach Motivational Positive Affects Modulate Cognitive Control: The Enhancement of Cognitive Retention
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2017.79141, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,465  浏览: 3,646  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 李云云, 闫春平, 张 钦：首都师范大学心理系，北京市“学习与认知”重点实验室，北京
关键词: 积极情绪；社会性趋近动机；生理性趋近动机；认知控制；保持性；灵活性；Positive Affects； Social Approach Motivation； Physiological Approach Motivation； Cognitive Control； Retention； Flexibility
摘要: 已有研究考察了积极情绪趋近动机强度对认知控制的影响，证明高趋近积极情绪增强认知的保持性，低趋近积极情绪促进认知灵活性。以往的研究主要考察生理性高趋近动机的积极情绪(如：对食物的渴望)的作用，而社会依附性相关的高趋近积极情绪(如：对人脸笑容的亲近)对认知控制影响的研究较少，且相关研究结果不明确。因此本研究通过微笑的人物图片和美食图片分别诱发社会性和生理性趋近积极情绪，并记录被试在不同情绪条件下AX-连续操作任务(CPT)的成绩。结果显示生理性趋近积极情绪影响BX试次的错误率，而社会性趋近积极情绪影响AY试次的反应时。表明社会性高趋近积极情绪对认知控制的作用与生理性高趋近积极情绪的作用类似，两种情绪都增强了认知控制的保持性。
Abstract: Previous studies have examined the effect of positive emotional approach motivation on cognitive control, demonstrating that high approach positive affects increase cognitive retention, low approach positive affects promote cognitive flexibility. The previous researches mainly investigated the effects of physiological high approach motivational positive affect (such as: the desire for food), but the impacts of social attachment related high reaching positive affects (such as: tending to approach the smile face) on cognitive control had been examined rarely, and related research results is not clear. Therefore, this study induced social and physiological positive emotions by smiling characters pictures and food pictures, and recorded the subjects’ performances on AX-continuous performance task (CPT) under different affective conditions. The results showed that the physiological approach positive affects influenced the error rate of the BX trial, while the social approach positive affects influenced the reaction times of the AY trial. These demonstrated that the social high approach positive affects had similar effects on cognitive control with the physiological high approach positive affects. These two affects both enhanced the retention of cognitive control.
文章引用：李云云, 闫春平, 张钦 (2017). 社会性高趋近积极情绪调节认知控制：对稳定性的增强作用. 心理学进展, 7(9), 1130-1136. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2017.79141

参考文献

[1] 王振宏, 刘亚, 蒋长好(2013). 不同趋近动机强度积极情绪对认知控制的影响. 心理学报, 45(5), 546-555.
[2] Carter, C. S. (1998). Neuroendocrine Perspectives on Social Attachment and Love. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23, 779-818.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(98)00055-9
[3] Chiew, K. S., & Braver, T. S. (2014). Dissociable Influences of Reward Motivation and Positive Emotion on Cognitive Control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 509-529.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0280-0
[4] Dreisbach, G. (2006). How Positive Affect Modulates Cognitive Control: The Costs and Benefits of Reduced Maintenance Capability. Brain and Cognition, 60, 11-19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2005.08.003
[5] Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How Positive Affect Modulates Cognitive Control: Reduced Perseveration at the Cost of Increased Distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 30, 343.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.343
[6] Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2014). The Differential Influences of Positive Affect, Random Reward, and Performance-Contingent Reward on Cognitive Control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 530-547.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0259-x
[7] Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2008). Approach-Motivated Positive Affect Reduces Breadth of Attention. Psychological Science, 19, 476-482.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02112.x
[8] Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010a). The Motivational Dimensional Model of Affect: Implications for Breadth of Attention, Memory, and Cognitive Categorisation. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 322-337.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903378305
[9] Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010b). The Effect of Low Versus High Approach-Motivated Positive Affect on Memory for Peripherally versus Centrally Presented Information. Emotion, 10, 599-603.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018426
[10] Harmon-Jones, E., Gable, P. A., & Price, T. F. (2012). The Influence of Affective States Varying in Motivational Intensity on Cognitive Scope. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 73.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00073
[11] Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. (1999). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings. Technical Report No. A-4, Gainsville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
[12] Liu, L., & Xu, B. (2016). The Effect of Low versus High Approach-Motivated Positive Affect on the Balance between Maintenance and Flexibility. Neuroscience Letters, 622, 55-60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2016.04.042
[13] Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2014). Positive Affect and Cognitive Control: Approach-Motivation Intensity Influences the Balance between Cognitive Flexibility and Stability. Psychological Science, 25, 1116-1123.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614525213
[14] Nee, D. E., & Brown, J. W. (2012). Rostral-Caudal Gradients of Abstraction Revealed by Multi-Variate Pattern Analysis of Working Memory. NeuroImage, 63, 1285-1294.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.034
[15] Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling More than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
[16] Servan-Schreiber, D., Cohen, J. D., & Steingard, S. (1996). Schizophrenic Deficits in the Processing of Context: A Test of a Theoretical Model. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 1105-1112.
https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830120037008
[17] van Wouwe, N. C., Band, G. P. H., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2011). Positive affect Modulates Flexibility and Evaluative Control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 524-539.
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21380