基于2011计划的高校体制机制协同创新绩效综合评价研究—以两型社会协同创新中心为例
A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Performance of University Institutional Mechanisms Based on the 2011 Plan—The Case study of Collaborative Innovation Center for Two-Oriented Society
DOI: 10.12677/CES.2017.54060, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,644  浏览: 2,267  科研立项经费支持
作者: 周志方, 聂 磊, 蔡严斐:中南大学商学院,湖南 长沙
关键词: 高校2011计划体制机制改革绩效评价体系University The 2011 Plan The Reform of System and Mechanism Performance Evaluation System
摘要: 我国高校机制体制改革一直是学界关注的热点问题之一,而如何科学合理评价高校协同创新综合绩效更是衡量高校体制机制改革有效与否的关键。本文在大量调研与分析的基础上,构建了一套以“2011计划”为基础的高校体制机制协同创新绩效综合评价体系,该评价指标体系分为定量指标和定性指标体系两大部分,并采用层次分析法设置指标权重,最后以两型社会协同创新中心为例进行了实证分析。
Abstract: The reform of the university system in China has been one of the hot issues in the academic circles, and how to scientifically and reasonably evaluate the comprehensive performance of the University’s cooperative innovation is the key to measure the reform of the university system. Based on a lot of research and analysis, this paper constructs a comprehensive evaluation system of the system of university system, which is based on the “2011 plan”. The evaluation index system is divided into two parts: quantitative index and qualitative index system. The index weight is set up by using analytic hierarchy process. Finally, the empirical analysis is conducted with the example of the cooperative innovation center for two-oriented society.
文章引用:周志方, 聂磊, 蔡严斐. 基于2011计划的高校体制机制协同创新绩效综合评价研究—以两型社会协同创新中心为例[J]. 创新教育研究, 2017, 5(4): 381-391. https://doi.org/10.12677/CES.2017.54060

参考文献

[1] Green, A. (1999) Education and Globalization in Europe an East Asia: Convergent and Divergent Trends. Journal of Education Policy, 14, 55-71.
https://doi.org/10.1080/026809399286495
[2] Jacobs, B. (2006) How to Reform Higher Education in Europe. Economic Policy, 7, 539-592.
[3] Estermann, T. and Nokkala, T. (2009) University Autonomy in Europe: Exploratory Study. European University Association, Brussels, 26, 39-41.
[4] Birnbaum, R. (2004) The End of Shared Governance: Looking Ahead or Looking Back Matter. New Direction for Higher Education, 127, 12-43.
[5] Dobbins, M., Knill, C. and Vögtle, E.M. (2011) An Analytical Framework for the Cross-Country Comparison of Higher Education Governance. Higher Education, 62, 665-683.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9412-4
[6] 丁烈云. 实施“2011”计划的意义、重点与难点[J]. 中国高等教育, 2012(20): 11-39.
[7] 王寰安. 我国高等教育体制改革为何成效不足[J]. 高等教育研究, 2011(4): 30-36.
[8] 马陆亭. 我国高等教育管理体制改革30年——历程、经验与思考[J]. 中国高教研究, 2008(11): 12-17.
[9] 毕宪顺, 赵凤娟, 甘金球. 教授委员会:学术权力主导的高校内部管理体制[J]. 教育研究, 2011(9): 45-50.
[10] 谌晓芹. 欧洲教育一体化改革: 博洛尼亚进程的结构与改革分析[J]. 高等教育研究, 2012(6): 92-100.
[11] 张园. 国家级协同创新中心新型科研组织模式发展[J]. 人民论坛, 2015(11): 85-87.
[12] 仲崇娜. 高校协同创新平台组织结构与运行机制研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2015(6): 29-34.
[13] Johnes, J. and Johnes, G. (1995) Research Funding and Performance in UK University Departments of Economics: A Frontier Analysis. Economics of Education Review, 14, 301-314.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7757(95)00008-8
[14] 戴航, 张培林, 孙孝文. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的物流园区选址研究[J]. 物流技术, 2014, 4(33): 98-100.
[15] 韩利, 梅强, 陆玉梅, 等. AHP-模糊综合评价方法的分析与研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2004, 14(7): 86-89.
[16] 吴丽萍. 模糊综合评价方法及其应用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2006: 40-46.