社区利益相关者对旅游影响的感知:上海老城厢历史文化风貌区案例
The Perceptions on the Tourism Influence from the Community’s Stakeholder: A Case Study of the Shanghai Old Town Area
DOI: 10.12677/GSER.2017.64026, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,807  浏览: 5,249  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 郭砚涛:浙江省海盐县旅游委员会,浙江 海盐;林 涛:上海师范大学旅游学院,上海
关键词: 社区旅游利益相关者旅游影响感知态度上海老城厢Community Tourism Stakeholders Tourism Affect Perception The Shanghai Old City Historical Landscape Protecting Area (SOCHLPA)
摘要: 近年来,社区旅游的迅速发展,这种旅游活动给社区带来了深刻的影响。由于旅游活动对不同利益群体的影响程度不同,其各自对旅游活动影响存在着比较明显的感知态度差异。本文通过对上海老城厢历史文化风貌区旅游者、旅游从业者以及社区居民等3个核心利益相关者走访和问卷调查,对42个旅游影响感知测项进行了统计分析,采用主成分分析法梳理出7个旅游影响因子,并通过均值和方差分析测评了旅游者、旅游从业者和社区居民对旅游影响感知态度的差异。结果表明,在上海老城厢历史文化风貌区,第一,社区居民对旅游活动带来的影响感知最深刻,态度最强烈,旅游从业者居次,旅游者得分最低;这些核心旅游利益相关者肯定了旅游活动为社区经济、文化发展做出了巨大贡献;第二,社区居民和旅游从业者明显感知到社区为旅游发展付出了较大的环境和社会成本,且其在社区税收、管理水平和效果方面没有达到预期水平,这种“成本–收益”不公平的现象基本符合社会交换理论。因此,社区居民和旅游从业者感知到的更多旅游活动的消极影响;第三,旅游者主要感知到的是旅游活动对社区带来的积极影响。他们认为,旅游活动给社区带来了经济效益,而且这些利益直接或间接分配给了社区居民及旅游从业者。
Abstract: With the rapid development of community tourism in recent years, the significant affects have been resulted from such kind of activities. Due to the different affects of tourist activities on the stakeholders in one community, their perception on the affects from tourism activities varies great obviously. Based on the interviews and questionnaires to 3 key stakeholders, i.e. tourists, tourism practitioners and community residents, who are from the Shanghai Old City Historical Landscape Protecting Area(SOCHLPA), this paper studies 42 indices of perception on tourism impacts and teases out 7 factors through mean and variance analysis by Principal Component Analysis. The authors conclude that, 1) in the SOCHLPA, the overall perception on the impacts of tourism activities from the three tourism stakeholders is that the residents’ perception is the most profound, the tourism practitioners in second place and the tourists’ in the last place and these three core stakeholders affirmed that the tourism activities contribute greatly to the community; 2) the community residents and tourism practitioners clearly have perceived that the community pays great environmental and social costs for the community tourism, and they do not realize the an-ticipating taxation and well-management for the community, this “cost-benefit” unfair phenomenon satisfies the social exchange theory basically. Therefore, the community residents and the tourism practitioners perceive primarily the negative impacts from tourism activities; 3) the tourists have perceived a positive impact on communities from their own activities. They believe that the tourism activities bring a great economic benefit to the community, and these interests directly or indirectly contribute to the community residents and tourism practitioners.
文章引用:郭砚涛, 林涛. 社区利益相关者对旅游影响的感知:上海老城厢历史文化风貌区案例[J]. 地理科学研究, 2017, 6(4): 230-242. https://doi.org/10.12677/GSER.2017.64026

参考文献

[1] Geelder, C.R., Ritche, J.R.B. 旅游学[M]. 第10版. 李天元, 等, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2008: 352.
[2] 郭华. 国外旅游利益相关者研究综述与启示[J]. 人文地理, 2008, 23(2): 100-105.
[3] 曾军.近期国外旅游影响研究综述——Annals of Tourism Research文献分析[J]. 云南地理环境研究, 2006, 18(6): 79-83.
[4] 李正欢, 郑向敏. 国外旅游研究领域利益相关者的研究综述[J]. 旅游学刊, 2006, 21(10): 85-91.
[5] Jamal, T.B. and Getz, D. (1995) Collaboration Theory and Community Tourism Planning. Annals of tourism research, 22, 186-204.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(94)00067-3
[6] Williams, C. and Davis, B. (1995) Land-Based Activities: What Remains to be Done. Ocean & Coastal Management, 29, 207-222.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0964-5691(96)00022-1
[7] Bramwell, B. and Sharman, A. (1999) Collaboration in Local Tourism Policymaking. Annals of Tourism Research, 26, 392-415.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(98)00105-4
[8] De Araujo, L.M. and Bramwell, B. (2002) Partnership and Regional Tourism in Brazil. Annals of Tourism Research, 29, 1138-1164.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00033-6
[9] Tosun, C. (2000) Limits to Community Participation in the Tourism Development Process in Developing Countries. Tourism Management, 21, 613-633.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00009-1
[10] Aas, C., Ladkin, A. and Fletcher, J. (2005) Stakeholder Collaboration and Heritage Management. Annals of Tourism Research, 32, 28-48.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.04.005
[11] Wilson, S., Fesenmaier, D.R., Fesenmaier, J., et al. (2001) Factors for Success in Rural Tourism Development. Journal of Travel Research, 40, 132-138.
https://doi.org/10.1177/004728750104000203
[12] Fallon, L.D. and Kriwoken, L.K. (2003) Community In-volvement in Tourism Infrastructure—The Case of the Strahan Visitor Centre, Tasmania. Tourism Management, 24, 289-308.
[13] Andriotis, K. (2005) Community Groups’ Perceptions of and Preferences for Tourism Development: Evidence from Crete. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 29, 67-90.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348004268196
[14] 刘中山, 代合治. 国内旅游利益相关者研究进展及启示[J]. 旅游纵览(下半月), 2012(11): 121-123.
[15] 粟路军, 何学欢. 国内旅游利益相关者研究进展及展望[J]. 湖南财政经济学院学报, 2011, 27(130): 67-72.
[16] 王波, 章仁俊. 基于利益相关者理论的国内外旅游应用研究综述[J]. 特区经济, 2008(7): 156-158.
[17] 王德刚, 邢鹤龄. 旅游利益论[J]. 旅游科学, 2011, 25(2): 8-15.
[18] 李建林, 贾雷. 基于利益相关者理论视角对景区依托型“农家乐”旅游可持续发展的探讨——以东平国家森林公园地区建设镇农家乐为例[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2013, 24(1): 61-62.
[19] 彭恺, 周均清. 利益相关者理论与历史街区复兴[J]. 城市问题, 2012(11): 66-70.
[20] 赵彤. 区域旅游合作中的利益冲突及协调路径分析——基于利益相关者理论[J]. 商场现代化, 2012(30): 99-100.
[21] 葛军莲, 顾小钧, 龙毅. 基于利益相关者理论的智慧景区建设探析[J]. 生产力研究, 2012(5): 183-184.
[22] 鲁瑾. 利益相关者理论框架下的无锡夜间旅游产品开发[J]. 延安职业技术学院学报, 2012, 26(5): 11-12.
[23] 王兆峰, 腾飞. 西部民族地区旅游利益相关者冲突及协调机制研究[J]. 江西社会科学, 2012(1): 196-201.
[24] 古红梅. 乡村旅游发展与构建农村居民利益分享机制研究——以北京市海淀区西北部地区旅游业发展为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2012, 27(1): 26-30.
[25] 陈辰. 基于利益相关者的佛教遗产旅游开发探讨——以南京市佛教遗产为例[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011(S2): 76-79.
[26] 彭惠军, 黄翅勤. 利益相关者视角下宗教名山旅游景区可持续发展研究——以南岳衡山为例[J]. 市场论坛, 2011(6): 65-66.
[27] 卢小丽, 肖贵蓉. 居民旅游影响感知测量量表开发的实证研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2008, 23(6): 86-89.
[28] Ap, J. (1992) Resi-dents’ Perceptions on Tourism Impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 19, 665-690.
[29] Lankford, S.V. and Howard, D.R. (1994) Developing a Tourism Impact Attitude Scale. Annals of Tourism Research, 21, 121-139.
[30] Byrd, E.T., Bosley, H.E. and Dronberger, M.G. (2009) Comparisons of Stakeholder Perceptions of Tourism Impacts in Rural Eastern North Carolina. Tourism Management, 30, 693-703.
[31] Dyer, P., Aberdeen, L. and Schuler, S. (2003) Tour-ism Impacts on an Australian Indigenous Community: A Djabugay Case Study. Tourism Management, 24, 83-95.
[32] 邹统钎, 郑春晖. 不同类别遗产地社区居民对旅游影响感知的差异研究[J]. 旅游论坛, 2012, 5(1): 29-33.
[33] 韩国圣, 张捷, 黄跃雯, 等. 天堂寨景区农村社区居民旅游影响感知的差异分析[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(12): 1525-1532.
[34] 程占红, 牛莉芹, 吴必虎. 基于DCCA方法的旅游从业者对旅游影响认知水平的排序[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(3): 715-720.
[35] 程绍文, 张捷, 徐菲菲, 等. 自然旅游地社区居民旅游发展期望与旅游影响感知对其旅游态度的影响——对中国九寨沟和英国NF国家公园的比较研究[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(12): 2179-2188.
[36] McMinn, S. (1997) The Challenge of Sustainable Tourism. The Environmentalist, 17, 135-141.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018504117490
[37] 张文, 唐飞. 评述Ap和Crompton的旅游影响评估尺度[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2004(1): 55-63.
[38] 邹统钎, 李涛, 陈芸. 基于对应分析法的遗产旅游影响感知差异研究[J]. 人文地理, 2010, 25(4): 104-108.
[39] 惜珍. 永不飘散的风情——上海的历史文化风貌区[M]. 上海: 东方出版中心, 2009.
[40] Ap, J. and Crompton, J.L. (1998) Developing and Testing a Tourism Impact Seale. Journal of Travel Research, 37, 120-130.
https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759803700203
[41] 刘德秀, 秦远好. 旅游地居民对旅游影响的感知与态度[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2008, 34(4): 133-138.
[42] 卢松, 张捷, 李东和, 等. 旅游地居民对旅游影响感知和态度的比较——以西递景区与九寨沟景区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(6): 646-656.