全尺寸钢筋混凝土桥墩柱ABAQUS动力分析
Dynamic Analysis of a Full-Scale Bridge Reinforced Concrete Column Using ABAQUS
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2017.66068, PDF, HTML, XML,  被引量 下载: 2,236  浏览: 5,621  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 方自虎, 李向鹏:深圳大学土木工程学院,广东 深圳
关键词: 混凝土结构地震荷载材料模型数值分析ABAQUSConcrete Structures Earthquake Loading Material Model Numerical Analysis ABAQUS
摘要: 本文提出两个纤维梁单元混凝土模型。模型由拉压骨架曲线和加载卸载路径组成,其中,受拉骨架曲线由弹性和线性软化两段组成;受压骨架曲线由线性弹性和随后EN 1992版欧盟混凝土规范建议公式结合KENT-PARK模型组成,其混凝土峰值压应力,对于非约束混凝土采用圆柱体抗压强度,对于约束混凝土采用KENT-PARK模型计算。加载卸载路径分别采用OpenSees的CONCRETE01和CONCRETE02模型路径。依据ABAQUS平台的用户材料接口UMAT,开发了两个适用于纤维梁单元的混凝土模型用户子程序,F1-CON和F2-CON。通过对比全尺寸振动台试验各项结果,本文开发用户子程序与模拟方法的可靠性得到验证,结果表明用户子程序能很好地反映受地震荷载作用的钢筋混凝土柱强度与刚度的退化,模型可以广泛用于精细化模拟钢筋混凝土柱及其它弯曲构件。
Abstract: Two fiber-beam-element concrete models are presented. The models are comprised of a tension/compression envelope and unload/reload path. The tension envelope contains an elastic range and a linear soft zone. The compression envelope also includes a linear elastic range followed by the formulation of Eurocode No. EN 1992 and KENT-PARK model, whose peak stress is the concrete cylinder compressive strength for the unconfined concrete and is calculated by the KENT-PARK model for the confined concrete. The unload/reload paths of OpenSees CONCRETE01 and CONCRETE02 are used. According to UMAT interface provided by ABAQUS platform, two user subroutines of concrete, F1-CON and F2-CON, are developed for fiber beam element. By means of comparison with the results of a full scale shaking table test, reliabilities of the user subroutines and modeling methods were validated. The results show that the subroutines can well reflect strength and stiffness degradation of reinforced concrete columns produced by earthquake loading. The subroutines are widely applicable to refined simulation of concrete columns or other flexural members widely.
文章引用:方自虎, 李向鹏. 全尺寸钢筋混凝土桥墩柱ABAQUS动力分析[J]. 土木工程, 2017, 6(6): 564-575. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2017.66068

参考文献

[1] Francesco, C. (2010) Shake-Table Test on a Full-Scale Bridge Reinforced Concrete Column. Bachelor Thesis, Bologna University, Bologna.
[2] Schoettler, M.J., Restrepo, J.I. and Mathin, S.A. (2015) Concrete Column Blind Prediction Contest 2010: Outcomes and Observations. PEER Report No. 2015/01, University of California, Berkeley.
[3] Schoettler, M.J., Restrepo, J.I., Guerrini, G., et al. (2015) A Full-Scale, Single-Column Bridge Bent Tested by Shake- Table Excitation. PEER Report No. 2015/02, University of California, Berkeley.
[4] 杜柯. 强震下高层建筑反应模拟方法研究及其平台开发[D]: [博士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2013.
[5] 李正, 李忠献. 一种修正的混凝土弹性损伤本构模型及其应用[J]. 工程力学, 2011, 28(8): 45-150.
[6] Scott, B.D., Park, R. and Priestley, M.J.N. (1982) Stress Strain Behavior of Concrete Confined by Overlapping Hoops at Low and High Strain Rates. ACI Structural Journal, 79, 13-27.
[7] 方自虎, 李向鹏. 钢筋混凝土结构的钢筋滞回模型[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 即将发表.
[8] 方自虎, 谢强, 周尧, 等. 循环荷载下MCFT混凝土结构模型[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2015, 35(3): 1-6.
[9] Seismosoft (2013) Seismo Struct Version 6—Verification Report [EB/OL]. http://www.seismosoft.com/Public/EditorUpload/Documents /SeismoStruct %202016%20Verification%20Report.pdf