慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者超敏C反应蛋白与纤维蛋白原含量的变化及其临床意义
The Changes and Their Clinical Significance of Serum High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) and Plasma Fibrinogen (Fib) in COPD Patients
摘要: 目的:探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)及慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期(stable COPD, SCOPD)患者血清超敏C反应蛋白(High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, hs-CRP)、纤维蛋白原(plasma Fibrino-gen, Fib)含量变化及临床意义。方法:采用病例对照组研究设计,选取我院呼吸内科自2015年12月-2016年12月收治的AECOPD组患者80例,将此AECOPD组患者经治疗病情稳定达1个月以上的患者纳入SCOPD组,共35例,分别于早晨抽取空腹静脉血,检测hs-CRP、Fib,对照组选取同时间段的健康体检者75例,于体检中心早晨抽取空腹静脉血检测hs-CRP、Fib,比较其水平差异;同时测定AECOPD组、SCOPD组患者的第一秒用力呼气容积占预计值百分比(FEV1%pred)及第一秒用力呼气容积与用力肺活量的比值(FEV1/FVC(%))水平,分析血清hs-CRP、Fib水平与FEV1%pred及FEV1/FVC(%)的相关性。结果:AECOPD组、SCOPD组、健康对照组的血清hs-CRP、Fib水平分别为((15.23 ± 7.01) mg/L, (4.79 ± 1.31)g/L)、((3.61 ± 2.84) mg/L, (3.87 ± 1.63) g/L)、((1.76 ± 1.25) mg/L (3.03 ± 0.44)g/L),AECOPD组血清hs-CRP、Fib水平均高于SCOPD组及健康对照组,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05);SCOPD组hs-CRP、Fib水平高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05);AECOPD组FEV1%pred及FEV1/FVC(%)分别为(47.30 ± 15.57) (52.63 ± 14.83),SCOPD组FEV1%pred及FEV1/FVC(%)分别为(52.63 ± 14.83) (59.36 ± 4.19)。SCOPD组FEV1/FVC(%)水平高于AECOPD组,差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.05);两组的FEV1%pred水平比较,差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05);COPD患者血清hs-CRP、Fib水平与FEV1%pred均呈负相关(r分别等于−0.69,−0.78,均p < 0.05);与FEV1/FVC(%)比较呈负相关(r = −0.58, −0.44, p < 0.05)。结论:血清hs-CRP、Fib水平可作为预测COPD病情加重的参考指标,对改善预后有重要意义。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the changes of serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and plasma Fibrinogen (Fib) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary dis-ease (COPD). Method: A case control study was carried out on 80 cases of the AECOPD patients ad-mitted Respiratory Medicine of our hospital since December 2015 to December 2016. Forty five AECOPD patients (AECOPD group), thirty five patients with COPD at stable phase (SCOPD group), se-venty five healthy people (control group) were selected in this study. And their hs-CRP and plasma Fib in serum were tested, the differences in three groups were compared. Meanwhile, their FEV1%pred and FEV1/FVC(%) also be measured. Results: The level of hs-CRP and Fib in AECOPD group, SCOPD group, control group were [(15.23 ± 7.01) mg/L, (4.79 ± 1.31) g/L], [(3.61 ± 2.84) mg/L, (3.87 ± 1.63) g/L], [(1.76 ± 1.25) mg/L (3.03 ± 0.44) g/L]. The level of serum hs-CRP and Fib were significantly increased in patients with AECOPD as compared with controls and stable COPD (p < 0.05). Comparison between stable COPD and control group about serum levels of hs-CRP and Fib had significant difference (p < 0.05). The levels of FEV1%pred and FEV1/FVC(%) in AECOPD group and SCOPD group were (47.30 ± 15.57) (52.63 ± 14.83), (52.63 ± 14.83) (59.36 ± 4.19) respectively. FEV1/FVC(%) levels were significantly increased in AECOPD group compared with SCOPD group (p < 0.05). Compared with their FEV1%pred levels, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05). The hs-CRP, Fib were negatively correlated with the FEV1%pred (r = −0.69, −0.78, p < 0.05). They were also negatively correlated with the FEV1/FVC(%) (r = −0.58, −0.44, p < 0.05). Conclusion: The levels of hs-CRP and Fib can be good indicators in the diagnosis and condition monitoring of COPD.
文章引用:武红莉, 田瑞雪, 叶青, 宋育佳. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者超敏C反应蛋白与纤维蛋白原含量的变化及其临床意义[J]. 临床医学进展, 2017, 7(5): 265-270. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2017.75044

参考文献

[1] Leidy, N.K., Wilcox, T.K., Jones, P.W., et al. (2011) Standardizing Measurement of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations, Reliability and Validity of a Patient-Reported Diary. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 183, 323-329.
https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201005-0762OC
[2] 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)诊治专家组. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)诊治中国专家共识(草案) [J]. 中华哮喘杂志, 2013, 7(1): 1-13.
[3] Gan, W.Q., Man, S.F., Senthilselvan, A., et al. (2004) Association between Chronic Ob-structive Pulmonary Disease and Systemic Inflammation: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis. Thorax, 59, 574-580.
https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2003.019588
[4] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病学组. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2013年修订版) [J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2013, 36(4): 255-264.
[5] Shi, X. and Li, H. (2013) Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Acute Exacerbation Stage. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 5, 1367-1370.
https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1001
[6] Fischer, B.M., Pavlisko, E. and Voynow, J.A. (2011) Pathogenic Triad in COPD: Oxidative Stress, Protease-Antipro- tease Imbalance, and Inflammation. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 6, 413-421.
https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S10770
[7] Perera, W.R., Hurst, J.R., Wilkinson, T.M., et al. (2007) Inflammatory Changes, Recovery and Recurrence at COPD Exacerbation. The European Respiratory Journal, 29, 527-534.
https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00092506
[8] Deng, Z.C., Zhao, P., Cao, C., et al. (2014) C-Reactive Protein as a Prognostic Marker in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 7, 443-446.
https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1441
[9] 翁妙珊, 杜璐玲, 等. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者C反应蛋白与纤维蛋白原含量的变化分析[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2012, 11(14): 1093-1094.
[10] Dahl, M., Tybjaerg-HansenM A., Vestbo, J., et al. (2001) Elevated Plasma Fibrinogen Associated with Reduced Pulmonary Function and Increased Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 164, 1008-1011.
https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.164.6.2010067
[11] Gabay, C. and Kuahner, I. (1999) Acute-Phase Proteins and Other Systemic Responses to Inflammation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 340, 1376.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199904293401723
[12] 刘同赏, 郭彩宏, 等. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者急性加重期C反应蛋白与纤维蛋白原及前白蛋白变化[J]. 中国医药, 2010, 5(6): 519-521.
[13] 夏珊, 张紫燕. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者血清白介素6、超敏C反应蛋白水平与肺功能指标的关系研究[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2014, 20(10): 1349-1350.
[14] Donaldson, G.C., Seemungal, T.A., et al. (2005) Airway and Systemic Inflammation and Decline in Lung Function in Patients with COPD. Chest, 128, 1995-2004.
https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.128.4.1995