基于贝叶斯学习模型的天然气价格双边谈判研究
Bilateral Negotiation of Natural Gas Price Based on Bayesian Learning Model
DOI: 10.12677/wer.2012.11001, PDF, HTML, 下载: 3,368  浏览: 10,142 
作者: 章晶晶, 曹亚宏:中国石油大学(华东)经济管理学院
关键词: 贝叶斯学习模型双边谈判天然气价格
Bayesian Learning Model; Bilateral Negotiation; Natural Gas Price
摘要: 根据大用户向天然气供应商购买天然气的价格双边谈判的特点,将贝叶斯学习模型引入到谈判的博弈过程中。通过贝叶斯学习,双方能更精确的预测对方的报价,提高博弈的有效性。算例结果表明,供气商和大用户运用贝叶斯学习模型进行博弈可以有效提高谈判效率。
Abstract: Depending on the characteristic of bilateral negotiations on the price of natural gas between supplier and consumer, the Bayesian learning model was introduced to the negotiation game. By Bayesian learning, both sides can predict each other's offer more accurately and improve the effectiveness of the game. Calculation example proved that the Bayesian learning model can effectively improve the efficiency of negotiations.
文章引用:章晶晶, 曹亚宏. 基于贝叶斯学习模型的天然气价格双边谈判研究[J]. 世界经济探索, 2012, 1(1): 1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/wer.2012.11001

参考文献

[1] 李越, 李怀祖, 张文修. 概率和模糊条件下谈判报价模型[J]. 系统工程理论方法应用 2009, 8(2): 43-47.
[2] V. L. Smith. Experimental auction markets and the walrasian hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy, 1995, 4(73): 387-393.
[3] V. L. Smith. Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. American Economic Review, 2008, 5(72): 923-955.
[4] D. J. Kang, B. H. Kim and D. Hur. Supplier bidding strategy based on non-cooperative game theory concepts in single auction power pools. Electric Power Systems Research, 2007, 77(5-6): 630-636.
[5] 李志民, 李卫星, 王永建. 基于熵理论的最优潮流代理约束算法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2010, 25(11): 28-31.
[6] 谭忠富, 柏慧, 李莉等. 电力用户从发电商购电定价的双边贝叶斯动态博弈学习模型[J]. 华东电力, 2009, 27(3): 0384- 0388.
[7] F. S. Wen, A. K. David. Optimal bidding strategies and modeling of imperfect information among competitive generators. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, 2001, 16(1): 15-22.
[8] 茆诗松. 贝叶斯统计[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1999: 1-118.
[9] M. J. Ocborne, A. Rubinstcin. A course in game theory. London: The MIT Press, 2007: 225-237.
[10] (美)迈尔森. 博弈论–矛盾冲突分析[M]. 北京: 中国经济出版社, 2011: 314-327.
[11] K. Sycara. Bayesian learning in negotiation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2010, 48(1): 125-141.