基于类比补差法的不明桥承载能力试验研究
Analogy Survey-Compensating Method Based Bearing Capacity Test Research for Missing Data Bridge
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2017.63032, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,549  浏览: 2,144  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 彭可可*:佛山科学技术学院,交通与土木建筑学院,广东 佛山
关键词: 不明桥类比补差法破坏性试验承载能力研究Missing Data Bridge Analogy Survey-Compensating Method Destructive Test Bearing Capacity Research
摘要: 研究恢复不明桥资料及评估其承载能力的类比-补差法。提出用类比调查法恢复不明桥的配筋数据,基于不明桥建设期使用的规范和现行规范,提出承载能力补差法,预测不明桥需提高的承载能力。因改造某立交需拆除,采用上述类比-补差法恢复了该桥的截面构造尺寸和配筋数据,并对该桥的承载能力进行了评估。该桥拆除后,对拆除梁进行了破坏性试验,验证了恢复的截面配筋数据是准确的。将破坏时的实际承载能力与理论计算承载能力进行对比分析,结果较为吻合。上述试验验证了不明桥类比-补差法的准确性。该法可评估不明桥的承载能力,为不明桥的维修加固提供理论依据。
Abstract: Analogy survey-compensating method is proposed to recover the design information and estimate the bearing capability of data missing bridge. The analogy survey method is used to recover the designed reinforcement data, based on the design codes used in construction period and the current design codes; bearing capacity compensating method is put forward to predict the bearing capacity which needs to be full filled according to the current design codes. A flyover needs to be removed for road reconstruction; the above analogy survey-compensating method is adopted to recover the designed reinforcement information, and estimate the bearing capacity compensating as well. A destructive test was conducted after the demolition of the bridge, which proved that the reinforcement data is accurate. At the same time, the comparative analysis is carried out between test value and theoretical value of bearing capacity research, when the test beam is failure, the results are consistent. The accuracy of analogy survey-compensating method is proved by the above destructive test, which can estimate the bearing capacity of missing data bridge, and provide theoretical basis for maintenance and reinforcement.
文章引用:彭可可. 基于类比补差法的不明桥承载能力试验研究[J]. 土木工程, 2017, 6(3): 280-287. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2017.63032

参考文献

[1] Patrón, A., et al. (2006) Improved Assessment Methods for Static and Fatigue Resistance of Metallic Railway Bridges in Europe. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, Porto, Portugal, 16-19 July 2006, 751-753.
[2] Gong, N.G., Choo, B.S. and Coutie, M.G. (1993) Crack and Contact Problems in Masonry Arch Bridges. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, 7-9 June 1993, 801-808.
[3] Stow, A.J. and Webber, D. (1998) Residual Life of Battle Damaged Bridges. Proceedings of the 1998 5th International Conference on Structures under Shock and Impact, Thessaloniki, Greece, 1 June 1998, 693-702.
[4] 陈喜龙, 徐郁峰. 某缺失资料简支梁桥的安全评估[J]. 广东公路交通, 2013(5): 22-26.
[5] 吕长荣, 宋郁民, 刘媛. 缺失资料刚架拱桥的荷载试验及性能评定[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2008, 6(3): 68-70.
[6] 罗声, 康小兵. 石拱桥承载能力分析及试验检测评定[J]. 公路工程, 2015, 40(3): 210-212.
[7] 刘喆, 夏叶飞. 缺失资料既有桥梁无损检测及承载力评定[J]. 河南建材, 2012(2): 48-49.
[8] 交通运输部公路科学研究院. 公路桥梁承载能力检测评定规程(JTG/T J21-2011)[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2011.
[9] 交通部公路规划设计院. 公路钢筋混凝土及预应力混凝土桥涵设计规范JTJ023-85[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 1985.
[10] 中交公路规范设计院. 公路钢筋混凝土及预应力混凝土桥涵设计规范JTG D60-2004[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2004.
[11] 中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路桥涵设计通用规范JTG D60-2015[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2015.
[12] 交通部公路规划设计院. 公路桥涵设计通用规范JTJ021-89[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 1989.