大学生创新思维影响因素的分析——基于双变量相关分析的实证
Impact Factor Analysis of Undergraduate Innovative Thinking——The Empirical Analysis Based on Bivariate Correlation
DOI: 10.12677/CES.2014.22004, PDF, HTML, 下载: 2,846  浏览: 9,796  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 卑雨潇, 陈雪波, 姜 鑫:辽宁科技大学研究生院,鞍山;孙秋柏:辽宁科技大学工商管理学院,鞍山
关键词: 大学生创新思维影响因素双变量相关分析Undergraduate Innovative Thinking Impact Factor Bivariate Correlation Analysis
摘要: 针对国内大学生创新思维能力不尽人意的情况,对辽宁科技大学师生进行问卷调查,利用信度分析与因子分析确定了教师自身、学生自身、社会环境、家庭环境、网络环境、学校的体制与机制、物质7个影响因素,以及包括社会从众心理、社会文化等30个题项,通过构建影响大学生创新思维的框图,并对各个因素进行双变量相关分析以验证大学生创新思维影响因素理论假设的正确性。研究表明:社会环境与家庭环境通过影响学生与教师的各个方面因素进而影响学生的创新思维,社会环境与家庭环境是决定大学生创新思维水平高低的根本因素。在此基础上,对进一步培养和提高大学生的创新能力提出了可行性建议
Abstract: Considering the situation of undergraduate innovative thinking, a survey of professors and students has been done in University of Science and Technology Liaoning. Seven main factors are selected as the common impact factors by reliability analysis and factor analysis, including professors, students, social environment, family environment, network environment, school system and substance. 30 influencing factors belong to seven main factors, such as conformity and culture, etc. The block diagram is built on the impact factors of innovative thinking and the bivariate correlation analysis in various factors is carried out to verify theoretical assumptions. The results show that the undergraduate innovation thinking can be indirectly influenced by social environment and family. Both social environment and family environment are primary factors of innovative thinking. On this basis, some feasibility recommendations are proposed.
文章引用:卑雨潇, 孙秋柏, 陈雪波, 姜鑫. 大学生创新思维影响因素的分析——基于双变量相关分析的实证[J]. 创新教育研究, 2014, 2(2): 17-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/CES.2014.22004

参考文献

[1] 庄寿强 (1997) 试论特点、属性的区别与联系及其在科学研究中的意义. 自然辩证法研究, 11, 44-48.
[2] 周明星 (1999) 创造教育与挫折教育. 中国人事出版社, 北京.
[3] 张丽华, 白学军 (2006) 创造性思维研究概述. 教育科学, 5, 86-89.
[4] Storm, R.D. and Strom, P.S. (2002) Changing the rules: Education for creative thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 183-200.
[5] Taylor, D.W., Berry, P.C. and Clifford, H. (1958) Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Administrative Science, 3, 23-47.
[6] Crutchfield, R. (1962) Conformity and creative thinking. In: Gruber, H., Terrell, G. and Wertheimer, M., Eds., Contemporary Approaches to Creative Thinking, Atherton Press, New York, 120-143.
[7] Cohen, D., Whitmyre, J.W. and Funk, W.H. (1960) Effect of group cohesiveness and training upon creative thinking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 319-322.
[8] McFadzean, E. (1998) Enhancing creative thinking within organisations. Management Decision, 36, 309-315.
[9] Chutivongse, N. and Gerdsri, N. (2011) Key factors influencing the development of innovative organizations: An exploratory study. 2011 Proceedings of Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET), Portland, 31 July-4 August 2011, 1-7.
[10] 张义生 (2004) 论创新思维的本质. 中共中央党校学报, 4, 28-31.
[11] 张忻 (2003) 论大学外语教育中创新思维能力的培养. 西安外国语学院学报, 3, 60-62.
[12] 李晋炬, 马志峰, 吴群之, 杜娟 (2010) 培养大学生创新能力和创新思维模式. 实验技术与管理, 10, 205-207.
[13] 卢琼, 陈荟, 婷尹立, 李震, 韩伟 (2010) 开放式设计性实验教学对医学生创新思维能力的培养. 当代医学, 10, 160-161.
[14] 王志军 (2009) 启发式教学——启发学生的创新思维. 实验技术与管理, 1, 17-18.
[15] 郭霞 (2008) 大学生创新能力培养研究. 中国教育创新导刊, 17, 75.
[16] 魏淑慧 (2008) 研究式教学与学生创新思维能力的培养. 山东师范大学学报, 5, 68-72.
[17] 刑燕丽 (2009) 信息素质教育改革与大学生创新能力培养. 图书馆工作与研究, 3, 93-96.
[18] 迟岩, 解源, 洪磊 (2005) 学生创新精神和创新能力培养的研究与实践. 教育探索, 5, 12-13.
[19] 杨珠英 (2012) 论管理方式对研究生创新能力的影响. 华章, 24, 124.
[20] 白育芳 (2003) 试析网络对创新思维的潜在影响. 高等教育研究学报, 1, 10-12.
[21] 钱梦缘, 朱永平 (2009) 网络环境对大学生创造力的影响. 南京邮电大学学报, 1, 38-40.
[22] Akaike, H. (1987) Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-322.
[23] Norusis, M. (2008) SPSS 16.0 guide to data analysis. Prentice Hall Press, Upper Saddle River.