高水平认知互动及其分析
High-Level Cognitive Interactions and Its Analysis
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2017.71010, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,418  浏览: 2,006 
作者: 彭杜宏：苏州科技大学教育与公共管理学院，江苏 苏州
关键词: 高水平；合作认知；互动分析；High-Level； Cooperative Cognition； Interaction Analysis
摘要: 互动的本质机制在于激发更高级复杂的认知功能。如何理解和洞察联合思维的互依本质及其产生性表现应成为合作性学习研究的重点。文章对新近涉及高水平互动探索的研究进行了如下归纳：1) 合作认知互动过程分析框架，如高水平共同调节分析框架、对话分析框架、分层分析框架等；2) 合作认知互动模式类型，如促进性互动、建设性互动、合作互动等，以及3) 高水平合作认知的核心要素，如交叉理解、精制、合作监控等。最后对未来合作认知互动过程研究提出了展望。
Abstract: The nature of interaction is to drive higher and more complicated cognitive function. How to un-derstand and observe the interdependent relationships and its productive indicators of joint thought should come to the center of team or group cooperative learning research. The paper reviewed new researches focusing on high-level interactions from following aspects: 1) The Analytical frameworks about member’s interactions, such as the high-level co-regulation framework, the dialogical framework and the layered framework. 2) Description about high-level interaction modes, such as the boosting interaction, constructive interaction and cooperative interaction. 3) Elements of cooperative cognition from empirical research conclusions, such as cross-understanding, elaboration and monitoring cooperatively. In the end, it proposed some suggestions on how to boost cognitive interaction research in the future.
文章引用：彭杜宏 (2017). 高水平认知互动及其分析. 心理学进展, 7(1), 67-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2017.71010

参考文献

[1] Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Smith, K. A. 刘春红, 孙海法, 编译(2001). 合作性学习的原理与技巧. 北京: 机械工业出版社.
[2] 汪航(2004). 合作学习认知研究综述. 心理科学, 27, 438-440.
[3] Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). The Effects of Monological and Dialogical Argumentation on Concept Learning in Evolutionary Theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 626-639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.626
[4] Barron, B. (2003). When Smart Groups Fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307-359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
[5] Beers, P.J., (Els) Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2005). Computer Support for Knowledge Construction in Collaborative Learning Environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 623-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.036
[6] Berkowitz, M. W., & Gibbs, J. C. (1983). Measuring the Developmental Features of Moral Discussion. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 399-410.
[7] Cooke, R. A., & Szumal, J. L. (1994). The Impact of Group Interactional Styles on Problem-Solving Effectiveness. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30, 415-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886394304005
[8] Daradoumis, T., Martínez-Monés, A., & Xhafa, F. (2006). A Layered Framework for Evaluating On-Line Collaborative Learning Interactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 622-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.02.001
[9] Ding, N. (2009). Visualizing the Sequential Process of Knowledge Elaboration in Computer-Supported Collaborative Problem Solving. Computers & Education, 52, 509-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.009
[10] Dolmans, D., & Schmidt, H. G. (2006). What Do We Know about Cognitive and Motivational Effects of Small Group Tutorials in Problem-Based Learning? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11, 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9012-8
[11] Eizenberg, M. M., & Zaslavsky, O. (2003). Cooperative Problem Solving in Combinatorics: The Inter-Relations between Control Processes and Successful Solutions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.001
[12] Fisher, E. (1994). Distinctive Features of Pupil-Pupil Classroom Talk and Their Relationship to Learning: How Discursive Exploration Might Be Encouraged. In B. Stierer (Ed.), Language, Literacy and Learning in Educational Practice (pp. 14 -28). London: The Open University Press.
[13] Forman, E. A., & Cazden, C. B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian Perspectives in Education: The Cognitive Value of Peer Interaction. In J. W. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, Communication, and Cognition (pp. 323-347). New York, NY: Wiley.
[14] Gillies, R. M. (2003). The Behaviors, Interactions, and Perceptions of Journal High School Students during Small-Group Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.137
[15] Gorse, C. A., & Emmitt, S. (2007). Communication Behaviour during Management and Design Team Meetings: A Comparison of Group Interaction. Construction Management and Economics, 25, 1195-1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701567413
[16] Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in Activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 79-96). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[17] Guiller, J., Durndell, A., & Ross, A. (2008). Peer Interaction and Critical Thinking: Face-to-Face or Online Discussion. Learning and Instruction, 18, 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.001
[18] Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 395-429. https://doi.org/10.2190/7mqv-x9uj-c7q3-nrag
[19] Hak, T., & Maguire, P. (2000). Group Process: The Black Box of Studies on Problem-Based Learning. Academic Medicine, 75, 769-772. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200007000-00027
[20] Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse Patterns and Collaborative Scientific Reasoning in Peer and Teacher-Guided Discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 379-432. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1704_2
[21] King, A., Staffieri, A., & Adelgais, A. (1998). Mutual Peer Tutoring: Effects of Structuring Tutorial Interaction to Scaffold Peer Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.134
[22] Klein, G. (2000). Cognitive Task Analysis of Team. In J. M. Schraagen, S. F. Chipman, & V. L. Shalin (Eds.), Cognitive Task Analysis (pp. 417-429). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[23] Kneser, C., & Ploetzner, R. (2001). Collaboration on the Basis of Complementary Domain Knowledge: Observed Dialogue Structures and Their Relation to Learning Success. Learning and Instruction, 11, 53-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00015-3
[24] Lewis, K., & Huber, G. (2008). Cross Understanding: Effects on Group Cognition and Performance. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings (pp. 1-6). Anaheim, CA. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2008.33636433
[25] Liu, C. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). An Analysis of Peer Interaction Patterns as Discoursed by On-Line Small Group Problem-Solving Activity. Computers & Education, 50, 627-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.07.002
[26] Mercer, N. (1996a). The Quality of Talk in Children’s Collaborative Activity in the Classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6, 359-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7
[27] Palincsar, A. L. (1998). Social Constructivist Perspectives on Teaching and Learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345-375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345
[28] Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension Monitoring Activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
[29] Pilkington, R. M. (1996). Analyzing Educational Discourse: The DISCOUNT Scheme (Technical Report No. 96). Leeds: Computer-Based Learning Unit at the University of Leeds.
[30] Ploetzner, R., & Fehse, E. (1998). Learning from Explanations: Extending One’s Own Knowledge during Collaborative Problem Solving by Attempting to Understand Explanations Received from Others. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9, 193-218.
[31] Saleh, M., Lazonder, A. W., & Jong, T. D. (2007). Structuring Collaboration in Mixed-Ability Groups to Promote Verbal Interaction, Learning, and Motivation of Average-Ability Students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 314-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.001
[32] Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What’s All the Fuss about Meta-Cognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education (pp. 189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[33] Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: What We Know, What We Need to Know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43-69. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
[34] Van Boxtel, C. (2000). Collaborative Concept Learning. Collaborative Learning Task, Student Interaction, and the Learning of Physics Concepts. Doctoral Dissertation, Utrecht: Print Partners Ipskamp.
[35] Visschers-Pleijers, A. J. S. F., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2004). Exploration of a Method to Analyze Group Interactions in Problem-Based Learning. Medical Teacher, 26, 471-478. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590410001679064
[36] Visschers-Pliejers, A. J. S. F., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., de Leng, B. A., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2006). Analysis of Verbal Interactions in Tutorial Groups: A Process Study. Medical Education, 40, 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02368.x
[37] Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2008). High-Level Co-Regulation in Collaborative Learning: How Does It Emerge and How Is It Sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19, 128-143.
[38] Webb, N. (1989). Peer Interaction and Learning in Small Groups. International Journal of Education Research, 13, 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1
[39] Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (1997). A Dialogical Framework for Researching Peer Talk. In R. Wegerif, & P. Scrimshaw (Eds.), Computers and Talk in the Primary Classroom (pp. 49-65). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
[40] Wilson, D. S., Timmel, J. J., & Miller, R. R. (2004). Cognitive Cooperation—When the Going Gets Tough, Think as a Group. Human Nature, 15, 225-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-004-1007-7
[41] Wriessnegger, S. C., Steyrl, D., Koschutnig, G. R., & Muller-Putz (2016). Cooperation in Mind: Motor Imagery of Joint and Single Actions Is Represented in Different Brain Areas. Brain and Cognition, 109, 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.08.008
[42] Yew, E. H. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2007). Process Study of Verbal Interactions in Problem Based Learning. http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/singapore07/procs/yew.pdf