新冠肺炎爆发期间医务人员的心理健康状况及与正负性情绪的关系
Mental Health Status of Public and Medical Staff's Relationship with Positive and Negative Emotion during Novel Coronavirus Disease Epidemic: An Online Survey
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2021.111019, PDF,  被引量 下载: 654  浏览: 4,039  科研立项经费支持
作者: 王珊珊, 余文婷, 黄 秦, 彭惠子, 李 丽:山西医科大学第二临床医学院,山西 太原;武 丽:山西医科大学,山西 太原;田 峰*, 朱卓影*:上海市精神卫生中心,上海
关键词: 新型冠状病毒肺炎心理健康正性负性情绪医务人员COVID Mental Health Positive and Negative Affect Medical Staff
摘要: 目的:研究普通群众和医务人员在新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)疫情下的心理健康状况及正负性情绪对其的影响。方法:采用线上问卷方法调查山西省太原市普通群众和医务人员的心理健康状况,探究正负性情绪对焦虑抑郁水平的影响。问卷内容包括广泛性焦虑量表(GAD-7)、9项患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)和中文版正性负性情绪量表(PANAS)。结果:焦虑情绪、抑郁情绪检出率分别为43.21%、53.46%,GAD-7得分、PHQ-9得分与正性情绪得分呈负相关(r = −0.452, r = −0.499, P < 0.001),与负性情绪得分呈正相关(r = 0.721, 0.452, r = 0.664, P < 0.001)。有序Logistic回归分析发现正性情绪是焦虑抑郁的保护因素(OR = 0.921, 95% CI: 0.894~0.949, OR = 0.912, 95% CI: 0.887~0.938);负性情绪是焦虑抑郁的风险因素(OR = 1.267, 95% CI: 1.230~1.305, OR = 1.215, 95% CI: 1.182~1.249)。结论:山西省太原市某区部分居民和医务人员的心理健康状况因此次新冠肺炎疫情受到不同程度的影响;医务人员的心理健康状况较普通群众良好;正性负性情绪对焦虑抑郁有一定的预测作用。
Abstract: Objective: To study the mental health status of the general public and medical staff during novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the relationship with positive and negative emotions. Me-thods: An online questionnaire method was used to investigate the mental health status of ordi-nary people and medical staff in Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province, and to explore the impact of posi-tive and negative emotions on anxiety and depression levels. The content of the questionnaire includes the Generalized Anxiety Scale (GAD-7), the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Chinese version of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS). Results: The detection rates of anxiety and depression were 43.21% and 53.46% respectively. The GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores were negatively correlated with positive emotion scores (r = −0.452, r = −0.499, P < 0.001) , positively correlated with negative emotion scores (r = 0.721, 0.452, r = 0.664, P < 0.001). Ordered Logistic regression analysis found that positive emotions are protective factors for anxiety and depression (OR = 0.921, 95% CI: 0.894~0.949, OR = 0.912, 95% CI: 0.887~0.938); negative emotions are the risk factors of anxiety and depression (OR = 1.267, 95% CI: 1.230~1.305, OR = 1.215, 95% CI: 1.182~1.249). Conclusion: The mental health status of some residents and medical staff in Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province has been affected to varying degrees by this new coronary pneumonia epidemic; the mental health status of medical staff is better than that of ordinary people; positive and negative emotions have a predictive effect on anxiety and depression.
文章引用:王珊珊, 余文婷, 黄秦, 彭惠子, 李丽, 武丽, 田峰, 朱卓影 (2021). 新冠肺炎爆发期间医务人员的心理健康状况及与正负性情绪的关系. 心理学进展, 11(1), 168-175. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.111019

参考文献

[1] 程家国, 谭晓东, 张玲, 等(2020). 新型冠状病毒肺炎确诊患者及隔离留观者心理状况的影响因素研究. 护理管理杂志, 20(1), 1-5.
[2] 何成雨, 张静, 王颖, 解超芳, 张文娟(2020). 新冠疫情期间基层医院医护人员心理韧性和社会支持现状. 中国健康心理学杂志, 1(10), 5-18.
[3] 黄丽, 杨廷忠, 季忠民(2003). 正性负性情绪量表的中国人群适用性研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 17(1), 54-56.
[4] 李少闻, 王悦, 杨媛媛, 等(2020). 新型冠状病毒肺炎流行期间居家隔离儿童青少年焦虑性情绪障碍的影响因素分析. 中国儿童保健杂志, 28(4), 407-410.
[5] 马楷轩, 张燚德, 侯田雅, 等(2020). 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间隔离人员生理心理状况调查. 中国临床医学, 27(1), 36-40.
[6] 马良坤, 段艳平, 郑睿敏, 等(2020). 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情防控期间孕产妇心理调整专家建议. 协和医学杂志, 11(2), 1674-9081.
[7] 曲姗, 胜利(2015). 广泛性焦虑量表在综合医院心理科门诊筛查广泛性焦虑障碍的诊断试验. 中国心理卫生杂志, 29(12), 939-944.
[8] 时勘, 范红霞, 贾建民, 等(2003). 我国民众对SARS信息的风险认知及心理行为. 心理学报, 35(4), 546-554.
[9] 杨红, 闫冬梅, 李先宾, 等(2015). 患者健康问卷抑郁量表在综合医院心身疾病门诊的应用. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 24(5), 473-476.
[10] 俞文兰, 孙道远(2020). 新型冠状病毒肺炎救治一线女护士心理健康风险及干预对策. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2(2), 1007-1326.
[11] 郑晨, 吴淑琴, 王岑, 等(2020). 新冠肺炎疫情期间湖北省居民心理健康状况调查. 中国公共卫生, 36(5), 657-660.
[12] 王学义, 金圭星, 王青翠, 等(2003). SARS流行期不同人群心理状况调查分析. 健康心理学杂志, 2003, 11(6), 1005-1252.
[13] 董人齐, 周霞, 焦小楠, 等(2020). 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间隔离人员心理状况调查研究. 康复学报, 30(1), 1-4.
[14] Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The Role of Positive Emotions in Positive Psychology: The Broaden-and-Build Theory of Positive Emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
[15] Joiner, T. E., & Lonigan, C. J. (2000). Tripartite Model of Depression and Anxiety in Youth Psychiatric Inpatients: Relations with Diagnostic Status and Future Symptoms. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29, 372-382.
https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP2903_8
[16] Russell, J. A. (2003). Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145-172.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145
[17] Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of Mood and Personality and Their Relevance to Assessing Anxiety, with an Emphasis on Self-Report. In A. H. Tuma, & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the Anxiety Disorders (pp. 681-706). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203728215-49
[18] Tellegen, A., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999). On the Dimen-sional and Hierarchical Structure of Affect. Psychological Science, 10, 297-303.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00157
[19] Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
[20] Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The Two General Activation Systems of Affect: Structural Findings, Evolutionary Considerations, and Psychobiological Evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820-838.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.820