洞庭湖区优质饮用水水源地安全评价研究
Safety Evaluation of High-Quality Drinking Water Sources in the Dongting Lake Region
PDF, 下载: 27  浏览: 34  科研立项经费支持
作者: 李 娜*, 伍佑伦, 袁艳梅, 潘雨齐:湖南省水利水电科学研究院,湖南 长沙
关键词: 洞庭湖区优质饮用水水源地评价指标体系熵权TOPSIS模型障碍因子Dongting Lake Region High-Quality Drinking Water Sources Evaluation Index System Entropy Weight TOPSIS Model Obstacle Factor
摘要: 为保障洞庭湖城乡居民饮水安全,满足新时代人民群众对饮水安全的美好需求,本文以洞庭湖区20个县级以上城市集中式优质饮用水水源地为研究对象,从水量安全、水质安全、水生态安全、水资源开发利用安全及管理安全五个方面构建洞庭湖区优质饮用水水源地安全评价指标体系,采用熵权TOPSIS模型评价水源地安全综合状态,并利用障碍度模型识别主要障碍因子。结果表明:洞庭湖区县级以上城市集中式安全优质饮用水水源地有13处,其中,铁山水库安全等级最高,金凤水库安全等级最低;水体自净能力、供水能力、水土保持率、供水保证率、优质水源水质达标率和富营养化状态是影响洞庭湖区优质水源地安全提升的主要障碍因子。研究结果与水源地实际情况及洞庭湖区供水相关规划情况基本相符,并以此为依据,提出了进一步提升水源地安全的措施和建议。
Abstract: To guarantee the drinking water safety of urban and rural residents in the Dongting Lake region and meet the people’s beautiful demand for drinking water safety in the new era, we take 20 centralized high-quality drinking water sources of cities above the county level in the Dongting Lake region as the case study. A high-quality drinking water sources safety evaluation index system is constructed from the five aspects: water quantity safety, water quality safety, water ecological safety, water resources development and utilization safety and management safety. The current situation of drinking water sources is evaluated comprehensively sing entropy weight method, and the main obstacle factors are identified by the obstacle degree model. The results show that there are 13 centralized safe and high-quality drinking water sources in cities above county level in Dongting Lake region, among which, Tieshan Reservoir has the highest safe-ty level and Jinfeng Reservoir the lowest; self-purification capacity of water bodies, water supply capacity, soil and water conservation rate, water supply guarantee rate, high-quality water source water quality compliance rate and eutrophication status are the main obstacle factors affecting the improvement of the safety of the high-quality water sources. The results are basically consistent with the actual situation of water sources and the relevant planning situation of water supply. We propose the corresponding measures and suggestions to further enhance the safety of the water source.
文章引用:李娜, 伍佑伦, 袁艳梅, 潘雨齐. 洞庭湖区优质饮用水水源地安全评价研究[J]. 水资源研究, 2024, 13(2): 1-10.

参考文献

[1] 大力实施水安全战略为建设现代化新湖南提供有力保障[J]. 中国水利, 2021(24): 78.
[2] 韩景, 吴巍巍. 太湖及下游水源地安全评价指标体系和方法研究[J]. 水利水电技术, 2020, 51(S2): 329-333.
[3] 柴元冰. 饮用水水源地安全综合评价体系的构建[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(14): 90-92.
[4] 朱党生, 张建永, 程红光, 等. 城市饮用水水源地安全评价(I): 评价指标和方法[J]. 水利学报, 2010, 41(7): 778-785.
[5] 魏怀斌, 李卓艺, 刘静, 等. 湖库型饮用水水源地安全评估指标体系研究[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 1-8.
[6] 王景深. 水源地安全评价指标体系探究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(2): 775-778.
[7] 左其亭, 张志卓, 吴滨滨. 基于组合权重TOPSIS模型的黄河流域九省区水资源承载力评价[J]. 水资源保护, 2020, 36(2): 1-7.
[8] 王晓艳, 章四龙, 刘磊. 基于AHP-熵权法的水环境承载力模糊综合评价[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2021, 44(9): 206-212.
[9] 王富强, 马尚钰, 赵衡, 等. 基于AHP和熵权法组合权重的京津冀地区水循环健康模糊综合评价[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2021, 19(1): 67-74.
[10] 罗紫薇, 胡希军, 汤佳, 等. 基于熵值-TOPSIS模型的湖南省水资源安全空间评价及障碍因子诊断[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2022, 33(6): 35-45.
[11] 雷勋平, 邱广华. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的区域资源环境承载力评价实证研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(1): 314-323.
[12] 殷昊源. 饮用水水源地安全状况评价及保护对策[J]. 河南水利与南水北调, 2017, 46(9): 14-15.
[13] 吴小伟, 刘平. 扬州饮用水水源地安全评价与控制对策[J]. 中国水利, 2014(19): 49-51.
[14] 徐幸仪, 袁艳梅, 何怀光. 湖南省优质饮用水水源地模糊综合评价研究[J]. 水资源研究, 2022, 11(3): 8.