北京牛口峪水库水生生物多样性及环境评价
Aquatic Biodiversity and Environmental Assessment in Niukouyu Reservoir, Beijing
PDF, 下载: 38  浏览: 47  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 张 舸, 吴嘉俊, 赵 文*, 魏 杰, 尹东鹏:大连海洋大学水产与生命学院/辽宁省水生生物学重点实验室,辽宁 大连;姜 松:北京鲟龙种业有限公司,北京;李 博:北京市水生野生动植物救护中心,北京
关键词: 牛口峪水库水环境评价浮游植物浮游动物生物多样性Niukouyu Reservoir Aquatic Assessment Phytoplankton Zooplankton Biodiversity
摘要: 在2017年和2018年夏秋季,以及2021年夏季,对北京牛口峪水库开展了5次水质状况和浮游生物群落采样调查,旨在为保护水库水生生物多样性和控制水域污染提供科学依据。结果表明,水库氮磷处于较高水平,总氮除2018年夏季为III类标准,其余皆为V类标准及以上;总磷平均为III类标准。加权综合营养指数显示水质总体为轻度富营养状态,污染程度处于轻度污染。浮游植物平均密度为5.35 × 106 ind./L,平均生物量为7.85 mg/L,平均多样性指数为3.60;平均均匀度指数为0.53,以硅藻门和绿藻门为优势,存在潜在的水华暴发风险。浮游动物平均密度为9430 ind/L,生物量平均值为2.61 mg/L,以原生动物和轮虫为优势,平均多样性指数为3.42,平均均匀度指数为0.64,存在小型化的趋势,浮游生物的多样性指数和均匀度指数有所降低。建议加强水质监测和管理,控制氮磷输入,保护生物的多样性和稳定性,实现水资源的可持续利用。
Abstract: Five sampling investigations were conducted on the water quality and plankton community characteris-tics in Beijing Niukouyu Reservoir at the summer and autumn of 2017 and 2018, as well as in the summer of 2021, aiming to provide scientific basis for the protection of aquatic biodiversity and the control of wa-ter pollution. The results showed that the nitrogen and phosphorus levels were at a high level. The total nitrogen was classified as Class V or above except in the summer of 2018, and the average total phospho-rus was Class III. The weighted comprehensive nutrition index showed that the water quality was gener-ally mildly eutrophic, and the pollution degree was mild. The average density of phytoplankton was 5.35 × 106 ind./L, the average biomass was 7.85 mg/L, and the average diversity index was 3.60. The average evenness index was 0.53, with Diatoms and Chlorophyta as the dominant species, and there was a poten-tial risk of algal blooms. The average density of zooplankton was 9430 ind/L, the average biomass was 2.61 mg/L, with protozoa and rotifers as the dominant species, and the average diversity index was 3.42. The average evenness index was 0.64, with a smaller trend, and the diversity index and evenness index of zooplankton decreased. It is suggested to strengthen water quality monitoring and management, control nitrogen and phosphorus input, protect biodiversity and stability, and achieve sustainable use of water resources.
文章引用:张舸, 姜松, 吴嘉俊, 赵文, 魏杰, 李博, 尹东鹏. 北京牛口峪水库水生生物多样性及环境评价[J]. 水资源研究, 2024, 13(2): 1-10.

参考文献

[1] 周一兵, 刘建军, 鲁贺. 全力打造京西南生态文明示范区——燕山石化率先实施生态型污水净化方案建设人工湿地[J]. 中国石化, 2018(1): 64-65.
[2] GENSEMER, R. W., GONDEK, J. C., et al. Evaluating the effects of pH, hardness, and dis-solved organic carbon on the toxicity of aluminum to freshwater aquatic organisms under circumneutral conditions. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2018, 37(1): 49-60.
https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3920
[3] 王哲, 尹东鹏, 赵文, 等. 南水北调后密云水库浮游植物多样性及水生态环境评价[J]. 吉林水利, 2020(5): 1-6+17.
[4] 王哲, 赵文, 魏杰, 等. 北京金海湖浮游生物群落结构及富营养化评价[J]. 生物学杂志, 2020b, 37(6): 88-93.
[5] 董显坤, 赵文, 任剑申, 等. 南水北调后密云水库浮游动物多样性及水生态环境评价[J]. 吉林水利, 2020(6): 1-6+11.
[6] 雷衍之. 养殖水环境化学实验[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[7] 赵文. 水生生物学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2016.
[8] 国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 第4版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
[9] 胡鸿钧, 魏印心. 中国淡水藻类——系统、分类及生态[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006.
[10] 胡鸿钧, 李尧英, 魏印心, 等. 中国淡水藻类[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1980.
[11] 蒋夑治, 堵南山. 中国动物志 节肢动物门 甲壳纲[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1979.
[12] 王家楫. 中国淡水轮虫志[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1961.
[13] 刘鸿亮. 湖泊富营养化调查规范[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1987.
[14] 赵文. 养殖水域生态学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011.
[15] 陈昱, 刘方平, 吴彩云, 等. 鄱阳湖流域典型种植模式农田地表径流与氮磷流失特征[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2023, 42(7): 101-108.
[16] GIBSON, G., CARLSON, R., SIMPSON, J., SMELTZER, E. and KENNEDY, R. Nutrient criteria technical guidance manual lakes and reservoirs. Washington DC: EPA, 2000.
[17] 袁聪, 陶诗雨, 张莹莹, 等. 安康水库表层浮游藻类群落结构及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(7): 2167-2176.
[18] 况琪军, 周广杰, 胡征宇. 三峡库区藻类种群结构与密度变化及其与氮磷浓度的相关性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(2): 231-235.
[19] 万莉. 四明湖水库浮游生物群落结构及其动态[D]: [博士学位论文]. 宁波: 宁波大学, 2014.
[20] 周萌, 李裴, 王忠锁. 密云水库浮游动物多样性格局[J]. 首都师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 34(6): 33-42.