Mobile version of Hanspub

文章引用说明 更多>> (返回到该文章)

Boyd, C.R., Tolson, M.A. and Cope, W.S. (1987) Evaluating trauma care: The TRISS method. Trauma score and the injury severity score. The Journal of Trauma, 24, 370-378

被以下文章引用:

  • 标题: 院内创伤评分的研究进展The Research Progress of Hospital Trauma Score

    作者: 颜琦, 李德溪

    关键字: 创伤, 创伤评分, 院内创伤评分Trauma, Trauma Score, Hospital Trauma Score

    期刊名称: 《Advances in Clinical Medicine》, Vol.5 No.3, 2015-09-04

    摘要: 在现代社会中,随着经济与科技的发展,创伤的种类与数量呈递增之势,自上世纪70年代以来,人们为了能够更好的判断伤情,更及时有效的救助患者,提出了希望将创伤数字化,以便更科学、高效评定创伤的程度及预后,创伤评分应运而生,经过30余年的努力发展,现已面世了多种院内创伤评分方法,并广泛应用于临床与科研,但在实际操作中各种评分方法又各有利弊。本文就目前几种常见的院内创伤评分方法进行综述,重点介绍其临床应用及意义。 With the economical and technological development in the modern society, both the types of trauma and the number of people affected by trauma have been escalating. Since the 1970s, in or-der to better assess the traumatic condition so as to rescue the patients more effectively and timely, trauma scoring was developed in response to the demand for visualization of trauma for a more scientifically sound and efficient assessment of the severity and prognosis of trauma. After more than 30 years with the development of the field, various hospital-based trauma scoring systems have emerged and been used extensively in clinical practice and scientific research. However, these scoring systems have their own advantages and disadvantages. This paper provides an overview of several trauma scoring systems that are commonly used in hospitals, with the emphasis on their clinical application and significance.