Mobile version of Hanspub

文章引用说明 更多>> (返回到该文章)

沈湘平. 价值中立与价值判断的勇气[J]. 思想理论教育导刊,2004, 6(4): 59-62.

被以下文章引用:

  • 标题: 西方“马克思学”:价值中立的神话Western “Marxist Study”: The Myth of Value Neutrality

    作者: 汪静, 吕晓科

    关键字: 西方“马克思学”, 价值中立, 意识形态Western “Marxist Study”; value neutrality; ideological

    期刊名称: 《Advances in Education》, Vol.1 No.1, 2011-03-03

    摘要: 西方“马克思学”以一种标榜价值中立的原则来研究马克思的文本,创造了超越意识形态界限的神话,同时也使西方“马克思学”因自身的问题而衰退。作为一种研究马克思和马克思主义的西方范式,西方“马克思学”对于我们从当代视野中对马克思主义研究有极大的借鉴作用。我们应从价值中立原则本身出发,揭露西方“马克思学”的意识形态陷阱及价值中立的神话,同时要辩证的看待西方“马克思学”及其宣称的价值中立原则,既要肯定其贡献,也要认清其存在的问题,进一步明确在社会科学研究中要完全做到价值中立是不现实的,价值中立只是一种神话。 Western “Marxist Study”, who flaunts its value neutrality principle when researching on Marx’s test, but also make itself recession for its own problems. As a western paradigm studying on Marx and Marxism, Western “Marxist Study” provides us great reference when researching on Marxism in contemporary perspective. We should start form the principle of value neutrality itself in order to expose the ideological trap of Western “Marxist Study” and the myth of value neutrality, also take a dialectical view on this. For one thing, affirm its contribution; for another thing, get a clear understanding of its problems. In further, it’s unrealistic to fully achieved value neutrality in social scientific research, and value neutrality is just a myth.