文章引用说明 更多>> (返回到该文章)

Lind, G. (2007). The meaning and measurement of moral judgment revisited——A dual aspect model. In D. Fasko, & W. Willis, (Eds.), Contemporary philosophical perspectives on moral development and education. New York, NY: Hampton Press.

被以下文章引用:

  • 标题: 道德判断的认知机制:研究现状与展望The Neural Mechanism of Moral Judgment: Research Status and Future Directions

    作者: 李亚丹, 杨文静, 贾磊, 张庆林

    关键字: 道德判断, 情绪直觉, 认知推理, 认知神经科学Moral Judgment; Affective Intuition; Deliberate Reasoning; Cognitive Neuroscience

    期刊名称: 《Advances in Psychology》, Vol.2 No.1, 2012-01-19

    摘要: 道德判断是个体判定他人或自己行为正当与否的认识活动,是人们进行道德选择和道德评价的一个关键环节。道德判断中的情绪直觉与认知推理及其作用机制一直存在争议。近年来主要围绕社会直觉论与双过程加工论,对正常人和脑损伤个体进行了关于道德两难问题的系列脑机制研究。未来研究应借助标准化的情境材料,在整合道德能力评估范式、提高生态效度并控制文化效应的基础上更加细致地探讨道德判断的神经机制。 Moral judgment, which was the key link of moral choice and evaluation, referred to individual’s cognitive activity about judging others’ or himself/herself’s behavior proper or not. However, there’s an argu- ment about the affective intuition, deliberate reasoning, as well as their neural mechanisms in moral judgment. Thus, a series of human brain lesion and imaging studies on moral dilemma had been discussed focusing on the Social Intuition theory and the Dual-process theory in recent years. Future studies on the neural me- chanism of the moral judgment should concern of the following factors: using standardized situational ma- terials, integrating different experiment paradigms, improving the ecological validity and controlling the cul- tural effect.

在线客服:
对外合作:
联系方式:400-6379-560
投诉建议:feedback@hanspub.org
客服号

人工客服,优惠资讯,稿件咨询
公众号

科技前沿与学术知识分享