文章引用说明 更多>> (返回到该文章)

梁启超 (1999) 答某君问德国日本裁抑民权事. In: 沈鹏, 等, 编, 梁启超全集第二册, 北京出版社, 北京.

被以下文章引用:

  • 标题: 晚清政治现代化的路径选择及其历史启示—以清末宪政改革为例The Path Selection of Political Modernization and Its Historical Enlightenment in Late Qing Dynasty—The Case of Constitutional Reform in the Late Qing

    作者: 杨亮军

    关键字: 政治现代化, 路径选择, 宪政改革Political Modernization, Path Selection, Constitutional Reform

    期刊名称: 《Open Journal of Historical Studies》, Vol.2 No.4, 2014-09-17

    摘要: 20世纪初,为了维系摇摇欲坠的封建专制统治,清政府立足中国政治传统,放眼世界政治发展潮,将政治革新看成是挽救封建政治体系和实现救亡图存的最后一根救命稻草。在1905年推进的宪政改革中,清政府通过考察立宪政治、颁布宪政法令、设置立宪机构、推动地方自治等措施对封建专制政治体系进行了较为全面地调整,希望能在中国确立起君主立宪制。这次在中国政治发展史上具有重要历史意义的政治改革虽然以失败告终,但它极大地撬动了封建专制政治体系,不仅使中国传统政治文化沐浴到了新鲜之气,而且还大大地推动了中国早期政治现代化的步伐。At the beginning of the twentieth century, the Qing government, based on Chinese political tradition, taking a broad view of the trend of world development, regarded the constitutional politics as the last life-saving straw to achieve the salvation and continue the feudal rule. In the political revolution movement in 1905, the Qing government made a whole adjustment to the feudal autocratic political system by observing the constitutional politics, issuing the constitutional decree, setting constitutional institutions, and encouraging local autonomy, and they hoped to establish a consti-tutional monarchy in China. The superincumbent reform failed, however, it greatly leveraged the feudal autocratic political system, and it not only brought fresh air to the Chinese traditional politics and culture, but also further promoted the process of the early political modernization of China.

在线客服:
对外合作:
联系方式:400-6379-560
投诉建议:feedback@hanspub.org
客服号

人工客服,优惠资讯,稿件咨询
公众号

科技前沿与学术知识分享