AP  >> Vol. 6 No. 12 (December 2016)

    汉字字频与语义启动的ERP研究
    An ERP Study on the Frequency and Semantic Priming of Chinese Characters

  • 全文下载: PDF(1147KB) HTML   XML   PP.1273-1279   DOI: 10.12677/AP.2016.612161  
  • 下载量: 766  浏览量: 974  

作者:  

李丽军,王权红:西南大学心理学部,重庆

关键词:
汉字字频语境交互激活模型多阶段激活模型ERPThe Frequency of Chinese Characters Semantic Priming Interactive Activation Model Multistage Activation Model ERP

摘要:

本研究采用汉字作为材料,在语义启动比例一比三的条件下,两因素——汉字频率(高频、低频)和语义启动(启动、无启动)的被试内设计,使用同一字延迟判断任务,探究汉字字频与语义启动的作用。结果发现字频与语义启动出现了加法效应,支持多阶段激活模型。

This study uses Chinese characters as materials, in terms of semantic priming a scale of three, two factors concluding frequency (high frequency, low frequency) and semantic priming (start, no start) within subject design, and explores the effect of frequency and semantic priming of Chinese characters. The results show that word frequency and semantic priming are additive effect, and support the multistage activation model.

文章引用:
李丽军, 王权红 (2016). 汉字字频与语义启动的ERP研究. 心理学进展, 6(12), 1273-1279. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2016.612161

参考文献

[1] 北京语言学院语言教学研究所(1986). 现代汉语频率词典. 北京: 北京语言学院出版社.
[2] 孙海静, 王权红(2011). 汉字字频和N400语义启动的交互影响. Conference on Psychology and Social Harmony.
[3] 孙海静, 王权红(2012). 汉字模糊度、字频和语义启动在N400上的交互作用:n400的IA模型的证据. 心理学报, 44(6), 745-753.
[4] Becker, C. A., Killion, T. H., & Becker, C. A. (1977). Interaction of Visual and Cognitive Effects in Word Recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 3, 389-401. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.3.3.389
[5] Bentin, S., Mccarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-Related Potentials, Lexical Decision and Semantic Priming. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(85)90008-2
[6] Borowsky, R., & Besner, D. (1993). Visual Word Recognition: A Multistage Activation Model. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 19, 813-840. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.813
[7] Brown, M., & Besner, D. (2002). Semantic Priming: On the Role of Awareness in Visual Word Recognition in the Absence of an Expectancy. Consciousness & Cognition, 11, 402-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(02)00008-9
[8] Fischler, I., Bloom, P. A., Childers, D. G., Roucos, S. E., & Perry Jr., N. W. (1983). Brain Potentials Related to Stages of Sentence Verification. Psychophysiology, 20, 400-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1983.tb00920.x
[9] Holcomb, P. J. (1988). Automatic and Attentional Processing: An Event-Related Brain Potential Analysis of Semantic Priming. Brain & Language, 35, 66-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(88)90101-0
[10] Holcomb, P. J., & Neville, H. J. (1990). Auditory and Visual Se-mantic Priming in Lexical Decision: A Comparison Using Event-Related Brain Potentials. Language & Cognitive Processes, 5, 281-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969008407065
[11] Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading Senseless Sentences: Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7350657
[12] Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain Potentials during Reading Reflect Word Expectancy and Semantic Association. Nature, 307, 161-163. https://doi.org/10.1038/307161a0
[13] Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1989). An Electrophysiological Probe of Incidental Semantic Association. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1989.1.1.38
[14] McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An Interactive Activation Model of Context Effects in Letter Perception: I. An Account of Basic Findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
[15] Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in Recognizing Pairs of Words: Evidence of a Dependence between Retrieval Operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031564
[16] Neville, H. J., Kutas, M., Chesney, G., & Schmidt, A. L. (1986). Event-Related Brain Potentials during Initial Encoding and Recognition Memory of Congruous and Incongruous Words. Journal of Memory & Language, 25, 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(86)90022-7
[17] Peng, D. L., & Tan, L. H. (1987). The Mechanism of Word Frequency and Semantic Context in the Recognition Processing of Two Chinese Characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 18-25.
[18] Rugg, M. D. (1985). The Effects of Semantic Priming and Word Repetition on Event-Related Potentials. Psychophysiology, 22, 642-647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01661.x
[19] Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1987). Ambiguous Words in Context: An Event-Related Potential Analysis of the Time Course of Meaning Activation. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 188-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)90123-9
[20] Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between Sentence Context and Word Frequency in Event-Related Brain Potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18, 380-393. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197127
[21] Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1991). Influences of Semantic and Syntactic Context on Open- and Closed-Class Words. Memory & Cognition, 19, 95-112. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198500