ML  >> Vol. 5 No. 4 (November 2017)

    Study on the Engagement Resources in Research Article Introductions of Applied Linguistics

  • 全文下载: PDF(546KB) HTML   XML   PP.309-316   DOI: 10.12677/ML.2017.54042  
  • 下载量: 457  浏览量: 1,302  



应用语言学论文引言CARS模式评价介入RA Introductions of Applied Linguistics CARS Model Appraisal Engagement


本文以Swales的CARS模式和J. R. Martin评价理论中的介入系统为理论框架,试图探究应用语言学学术论文作者在引言中如何运用收缩性和扩展性介入资源实现创建研究空间的交际目的,并分析上述资源在语步中的分布特征及语言表现形式。研究发现,学术论文作者在创建研究空间的过程中,多选用否定,反对和背书等篇际手段来限制与作者命题观点不一致的诸多声音的存在,收缩对话空间;同时利用接纳和承认等手段允许其他可能命题或立场的介入,保留足够的话语协商空间。

Using Swales’ CARS model and Engagement system within Appraisal Theory as points of departure, this paper aims to explore how the communicative purpose can be achieved via contracting and expanding engagement resources in RA introductions of Applied Linguistics, of which the distribution features as well as linguistic realizations are also analyzed. The research findings show that in the process of creating a research space RA authors primarily adopt contractive resources such as deny, counter and endorse to restrict the existence of different opinions and therefore contract the dialogic space. Meanwhile, expansive resources like entertain and acknowledge are employed to make sure that there is enough dialogic space for the other possible positions or viewpoints.

宁旭芳, 马静. 应用语言学论文引言中的介入资源探究[J]. 现代语言学, 2017, 5(4): 309-316.


[1] Anthony, L. (1999) Writing Research Article Introductions in Software Engineering: How Accurate Is a Standard Model? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42, 38-46.
[2] Ozturk, I. (2007) The Textual Organization of Research Article Introductions in Applied Linguistics: Variability within a Single Discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 25-38.
[3] Samraj, B. (2002) Introductions in Research Article: Various across Disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 1-17.
[4] Graves, H. and Moghaddasi, S. (2014) “Let G = (V, E) Be a Graph”: Turning the Abstract into the Tangible in Introductions in Mathematics Research Articles. English for Specific Purposes, 36, 1-11.
[5] 李俊儒. 中英文应用语言学论文引言部分的体裁分析与对比[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 上海外国语大学, 2009.
[6] 喻志刚, 钟兰凤. 理工科英语科研论文“引言部分”研究空间构建对比研究[J]. 外语界, 2016(6): 77-85.
[7] 马静, 任再新. 金融学与会计学学术论文引言语类结构及语言特征对比研究[J]. 东华大学学报, 2012, 12(2): 126-133.
[8] Hyland, K. (1998) Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
[9] Samaie, M., Khosravian, F. and Boghayeri, M. (2014) The Frequency and Types of Hedges in Research Article Introductions by Persian and English Native Authors. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1678-1685.
[10] 马静, 王双芷. 学术论文引言中认知情态型模糊限制语的人际功能——以纺织类学术论文为例[J]. 东华大学学报, 2013, 13(4): 247-251.
[11] 孙迎晖. 中国学生英语硕士论文引言部分转述语使用情况的语类分析[J]. 外语教学, 2009, 30(1): 53-57.
[12] 史文霞, 王振华, 杨瑞英. 介入视域中的中国博士生科技论文引言中转述的评价研究[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2012, 22(6): 94-100.
[13] 邹荣华. 中外英语硕士论文引言部分人称指示语使用的对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2012.
[14] 姚俊. 英语论文摘要的语篇模式与作者介入——英语本科毕业论文摘要的实证研究[J]. 外语教学, 2010, 31(4): 29-33.
[15] 袁丽丽. 科技论文摘要中情态表达的情态责任——从评价系统介入观点出发[J]. 文学界, 2010(8): 240-243.
[16] Geng, Y. and Wharton, S. (2016) Evaluative Language in Discussion Sections of Doctoral Theses: Similarities and Differences between L1 Chinese and L1 English Writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 80-91.
[17] 巩方园. 英语母语作者和中国作者英文文献综述中介入资源的对比分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2014.
[18] 李红蕾. 作者声音在介入系统中的体现——英语博士论文文献综述中的引用探析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2015.
[19] Martin, J.R. and White, P.R.R. (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan, London & New York.
[20] Martin, J.R. and Rose, D. (2003) Working with Discourse. Continuum, London & New York.
[21] 李战子. 评价理论: 在话语分析中的应用和问题[J]. 外语研究, 2004(5): 1-6.
[22] Bakhtin, M.M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination. University of Texas Press, Austin.
[23] Swales, J.M. (1990) Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[24] Swales, J.M. (2004) Research Genres. Exploration and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[25] Thompson, G. and Ye, Y. (1991) Evaluation in the Reporting Verbs Used in Academic Papers. Applied Linguistics, 12, 365-382.