网络格式条款的困境、成因分析与完善
Dilemmas, Cause Analysis and Improvement of Online Standard Terms
摘要: 网络格式条款在互联网时代的交易中具有显著优势,其在呈现方式、缔约场景与风险形态方面与传统的格式合同具有明显区别。相应地,网络格式条款在实践中呈现出缔约双方地位明显不对等、对合同自由带来挑战、对意思表示真实性产生挑战、对权利保护产生挑战等现实问题,上述问题的成因为现行法律的有限性、证明责任的移位与“显失公平”规定的模糊性。针对上述情况,文章提出了理性看待网络格式条款给合同自由原则带来的挑战、完善订入控制、完善效力控制、建立有效的行政审查机制、建立有效的纠纷解决机制五项完善建议。
Abstract: Online standard terms possess significant advantages in transactions of the internet era, exhibiting clear distinctions from traditional standard form contracts in terms of presentation, contracting scenarios, and risk profiles. Correspondingly, in practice, online standard terms present real-world issues such as a marked imbalance in the positions of the contracting parties, challenges to contractual freedom, challenges to the authenticity of intention declaration, and challenges to rights protection. The causes of the aforementioned issues lie in the limitations of current laws, the shift in the burden of proof, and the ambiguity of provisions regarding “gross unfairness”. In response to these circumstances, this article proposes five suggestions for improvement: rationally viewing the challenges posed by online standard terms to the principle of contractual freedom, perfecting incorporation control, improving validity control, establishing an effective administrative review mechanism, and creating a dispute resolution mechanism.
文章引用:吕钰瑶. 网络格式条款的困境、成因分析与完善[J]. 争议解决, 2026, 12(3): 123-130. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2026.123087

参考文献

[1] 齐欣. 网络购物格式条款的法律规制研究[J]. 特区经济, 2011(7): 254-256.
[2] Barnes, W. (2010) Consumer Assent to Standard Form Contracts and the Voting Analogy. West Virginia Law Review, 112, 839-872.
[3] Hillman, R.A. and Rachlinski, J.J. (2002) Standard-Form Contracting in the Electronic Age. New York University Law Review, 77, 429-495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Becher, S.I. and Zarsk, T.Z. (2008) E-Contract Doctrine 2.0: Standard Form Contracting in the Age of online User Participation. Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review, 14, 303-366.
[5] 吕冰心. 论网络格式合同条款的特性与规制[J]. 法学杂志, 2022, 43(3): 132-148.
[6] 张晓梅, 周江洪. 格式条款提供者的单方变更问题研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022, 52(10): 84-96.
[7] Korobkin, R. (2003) Bounded Rationality, Standard Form Contracts, and Unconscionability. The University of Chicago Law Review, 70, 1203-1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 郑学林, 刘敏, 高燕竹. 《最高人民法院关于审理网络消费纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定(一)》的理解与适用[J]. 中国应用法学, 2022(3): 19-29.
[9] 李涛. 智能合约格式条款的法律规制[J]. 科技与法律(中英文), 2024(6): 107-116.
[10] 迪尔克∙罗歇尔德斯. 德国债法总论[M]. 沈小军, 等, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2014: 23-24.
[11] 吴双. 论电子商务合同格式条款的法律配置: 问题、进路与方法[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(5): 96-103, 128.
[12] 夏庆锋. 在线订立格式条款的效力分析[J]. 环球法律评论, 2023, 45(3): 43-58.
[13] Yoan, H. (2017) Contracting around Privacy: The (Behavioral) Law and Economics of Consent and Big Data. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 8, 9-26.
[14] 胡安琪, 李明发. 网络平台用户协议中格式条款司法规制之实证研究[J]. 北方法学, 2019, 13(1): 53-62.
[15] 苏号朋. 论消费民事公益诉讼对电子商务平台的适用[J]. 法律适用, 2022(3): 26-34.