技术人工物本体论困境的分析与突破
The Analysis and Breakthrough of the Ontological Difficulties in Technical Artificial Objects
摘要: 当代技术哲学沿着两种不同的进路进行了经验转向。其中以荷兰学派为代表的技术哲学家们沿着“工程导向”进路,开辟了技术人工物本体论研究路径,产生了技术人工物的本体论“难问题”。由于“工程导向”进路采取分析哲学主客二分的哲学立场,导致这种“难问题”始终无法得到解决。“社会导向”进路为解决这一“难问题”提供了一种身体现象学思路。在此研究进路下,不仅消解了“结构”与“功能”之间的逻辑鸿沟,也解决了技术人工物在设计情境和使用情境中面临的心物二元关系难题。
Abstract: The contemporary philosophy of technology has turned to experience along two different approaches. Among them, the technical philosophers represented by the Dutch school opened up the research path of technical artificial ontology along the path of “engineering oriented”, and produced the “difficult problem” of technical artificial object ontology. Due to the “engineering-oriented” approach to adopt the philosophical standpoint of philosophical analysis, this “difficult problem” always cannot be solved. The “social-oriented” approach provides a physical phenomenological idea for solving this “difficult problem”. Under this research path, it not only solves the logical gap between “structure” and “function”, but also solves the problem of the binary relationship faced by technical artifacts in the design situation and the use situation of the heart and the object.
文章引用:王旭辉. 技术人工物本体论困境的分析与突破[J]. 哲学进展, 2022, 11(5): 1253-1260. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACPP.2022.115215

参考文献

[1] Brey, P. (2010) Philosophy of Technology after the Empirical Turn. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 14, 36-48.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 刘铮. 分析技术哲学的“难问题”及其身体现象学解决进路[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2018, 40(8): 112-118.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Kroes, P. (2012) Technical Artefacts: Creations of Mind and Matter. Springer Press, 4.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Houkes, W. and Meijers, A. (2006) The Ontology of Artefacts: The Hard Problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37, 118-131.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] [荷]威伯·霍克斯, 彼得·弗马斯. 技术的功能: 面向人工物的使用与设计[M]. 刘本英, 译. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015.
[6] 吴国林. 论技术人工物的结构描述与功能描述的推理关系[J]. 哲学研究, 2016(1): 113-120.
[7] Mitcham, C. (2002) Do Artifacts Have Dual Natures? Two Points of Commentary on the Delft Project. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 6, 9-12.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 梅洛-庞蒂. 行为的结构[M]. 杨大春, 张尧均, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014: 218.
[9] 邓波, 韩茜, 杨凡. 荷兰学派人工物理论的困境与突破——人工物分析“形态”维度的现象学拓展[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2020, 36(8): 31-37.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef