工作记忆中自动注意分配的优先级
The Priority of Automatic Attention Allocation in Working Memory
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2024.1411818, PDF,   
作者: 胡涵瑾:广州大学教育学院,广东 广州
关键词: 工作记忆注意注意优先级Working Memory Attention Attention Priority
摘要: 本文深入探讨了工作记忆与自动注意之间复杂而微妙的交互关系,并分析了物理显著性、奖励学习机制以及内隐学习如何在工作记忆中信息的筛选与处理过程中发挥影响。工作记忆,作为个体在执行各类认知活动时临时存储并操作信息的关键能力,扮演着筛选并聚焦当前任务所需信息的核心角色。自动注意,则是一种无意识的认知过程,它引导个体自然而然地关注那些物理特征突出或与过往记忆存在关联的刺激。本文着重指出,自动注意机制能够潜在地调整工作记忆中信息处理的优先级顺序,进而对整体的认知效率产生深远影响。这一研究不仅深化了我们对工作记忆与自动注意在复杂认知任务中协同作用机制的理解,而且为揭示人类认知系统的灵活性与高效性提供了宝贵的见解。本文的工作对于理解工作记忆与自动注意在复杂认知任务中的作用机制具有重要意义。
Abstract: This paper delves into the complex and nuanced interplay between working memory and automatic attention, examining how physical salience, reward learning mechanisms, and implicit learning influence the selection and processing of information in working memory. Working memory, as a crucial ability for individuals to temporarily store and manipulate information during various cognitive activities, plays a central role in filtering and focusing on information required for the current task. Automatic attention, on the other hand, is an unconscious cognitive process that naturally draws individuals’ focus to stimuli that are physically prominent or associated with past memories. This paper emphasizes that automatic attention mechanisms can potentially adjust the priority order of information processing in working memory, thereby exerting a profound impact on overall cognitive efficiency. This research not only deepens our understanding of the synergistic mechanisms between working memory and automatic attention in complex cognitive tasks but also provides valuable insights into the flexibility and efficiency of the human cognitive system. The work presented in this paper is significant for understanding the mechanisms of working memory and automatic attention in complex cognitive tasks.
文章引用:胡涵瑾 (2024). 工作记忆中自动注意分配的优先级. 心理学进展, 14(11), 480-487. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.1411818

参考文献

[1] Baddeley, A. (2003). Working Memory: Looking Back and Looking Forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829-839.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Bai, X., Liu, L., Song, J., & Guo, Z. (2016). The Role of Feature and Spatial Location in Value-Driven Attentional Capture. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48, 1357-1369.[CrossRef
[3] Bays, P. M., & Husain, M. (2008). Dynamic Shifts of Limited Working Memory Resources in Human Vision. Science, 321, 851-854.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Beck, D. M., & Kastner, S. (2005). Stimulus Context Modulates Competition in Human Extrastriate Cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1110-1116.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Becker, S. I., Grubert, A., Horstmann, G., & Ansorge, U. (2023). Which Processes Dominate Visual Search: Bottom-up Feature Contrast, Top-Down Tuning or Trial History? Cognition, 236, Article 105420.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Berryhill, M. E., Richmond, L. L., Shay, C. S., & Olson, I. R. (2012). Shifting Attention among Working Memory Representations: Testing Cue Type, Awareness, and Strategic Control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 426-438.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., & Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-Based Memory for Serial Order. Psychological Review, 107, 127-181.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Chelazzi, L., Duncan, J., Miller, E. K., & Desimone, R. (1998). Responses of Neurons in Inferior Temporal Cortex during Memory-Guided Visual Search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 2918-2940.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Chelazzi, L., E to inova, J., Calletti, R., Lo Gerfo, E., Sani, I., Della Libera, C., et al. (2014). Altering Spatial Priority Maps via Reward-Based Learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 8594-8604.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Constant, M., & Liesefeld, H. R. (2021). Massive Effects of Saliency on Information Processing in Visual Working Memory. Psychological Science, 32, 682-691.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Endress, A. D., & Potter, M. C. (2014). Large Capacity Temporary Visual Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 548-565.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Gong, M., & Li, S. (2014). Learned Reward Association Improves Visual Working Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 841-856.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Hills, T. T., Todd, P. M., & Goldstone, R. L. (2010). The Central Executive as a Search Process: Priming Exploration and Exploitation across Domains. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 590-609.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Jiang, Y. V., Sha, L. Z., & Remington, R. W. (2015). Modulation of Spatial Attention by Goals, Statistical Learning, and Monetary Reward. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 2189-2206.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Jung, K., Han, S. W., & Min, Y. (2020). Opposing Effects of Stimulus-Driven and Memory-Driven Attention in Visual Search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27, 105-113.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Kelley, M. R., & Nairne, J. S. (2001). Von Restorff Revisited: Isolation, Generation, and Memory for Order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 54-66.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] King, M. J., & Macnamara, B. N. (2020). Three Visual Working Memory Representations Simultaneously Control Attention. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 10504.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Krebs, R. M., Boehler, C. N., De Belder, M., & Egner, T. (2015). Neural Conflict-Control Mechanisms Improve Memory for Target Stimuli. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 833-843.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Martinez-Cedillo, A. P., Dent, K., & Foulsham, T. (2023). Social Prioritisation in Scene Viewing and the Effects of a Spatial Memory Load. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 86, 1237-1347.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Pougeon, J., Camos, V., Belletier, C., & Barrouillet, P. (2024). Quantifying Resource Sharing in Working Memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Ravizza, S. M., & Conn, K. M. (2022). Gotcha: Working Memory Prioritization from Automatic Attentional Biases. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 415-429.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Santangelo, V. (2015). Forced to Remember: When Memory Is Biased by Salient Information. Behavioural Brain Research, 283, 1-10.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Santangelo, V., Di Francesco, S. A., Mastroberardino, S., & Macaluso, E. (2015). Parietal Cortex Integrates Contextual and Saliency Signals during the Encoding of Natural Scenes in Working Memory. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 5003-5017.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2011). Active Suppression of Distractors That Match the Contents of Visual Working Memory. Visual Cognition, 19, 956-972.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Sisk, C. A., Remington, R. W., & Jiang, Y. V. (2020). A Spatial Bias toward Highly Rewarded Locations Is Associated with Awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46, 669-683.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Theeuwes, J. (2018). Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional. Journal of Cognition, 1, Article 29.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Uddin, L. Q. (2015). Salience Processing and Insular Cortical Function and Dysfunction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 55-61.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Umemoto, A., Scolari, M., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2010). Statistical Learning Induces Discrete Shifts in the Allocation of Working Memory Resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1419-1429.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Wallis, G., Stokes, M. G., Arnold, C., & Nobre, A. C. (2015). Reward Boosts Working Memory Encoding over a Brief Temporal Window. Visual Cognition, 23, 291-312.[CrossRef
[31] Weinstein, A. M. (2023). Reward, Motivation and Brain Imaging in Human Healthy Participants—A Narrative Review. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 17, Article 1123733.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Won, B., & Leber, A. B. (2017). Spatial Constraints on Probability Learning in Visual Working Memory. Visual Cognition, 25, 34-50.[CrossRef