基于AI教学代理的电子书在初中毒品安全教育中的应用研究
Study on the Application of AI Pedagogical Agent-Based E-Books in Junior High School Drug Safety Education
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2024.14122358, PDF,   
作者: 舒子杰:福建师范大学教育学院,福建 福州
关键词: 电子书教学代理AI人工智能E-Book Pedagogical Agent AI Artificial Intelligence
摘要: 教育电子书是一种重要的学习工具,在使用电子书学习时他人的支持和干预是必要,缺少相关支持和干预可能无法发挥电子书的最佳效果。在目前的课堂上,教师难以照顾到所有学生的阅读,因此,本研究开发了一个结合了AI教学代理的电子书学习系统,旨在使用AI支持下的教学代理来弥补这个缺陷。研究人员进行了一项实验,以比较使用了AI教学代理的电子书和未使用AI教学代理的电子书学习毒品知识后的成绩情况、学习动机和学习满意度。研究结果表明,使用了AI教学代理的电子书学习系统有利于提高学生的成绩、学习动机和学习满意度,这意味着AI支持下的教学代理在电子书学习中具有可观的潜力。
Abstract: Educational e-books are an important learning tool, and the support and intervention of others are necessary when using e-books for learning. Without relevant support and intervention, the best effects of e-books may not be achieved. In the current classroom, it is difficult for teachers to take care of the reading situation of all students, and students cannot guarantee good learning results. Therefore, this study developed an e-book learning system combined with AI pedagogical agent, aiming to use the AI-supported pedagogical agent to tutor students instead of teachers. The researchers conducted an experiment to compare grades, learning motivation, and learning satisfaction after learning about drugs in e-books using an AI pedagogical agent and e-books without an AI pedagogical agent. The results show that the e-book learning system using AI pedagogical agent can improve students’ grades, learning motivation and learning satisfaction, which means that the pedagogical agent supported by AI has considerable potential in e-book learning.
文章引用:舒子杰. 基于AI教学代理的电子书在初中毒品安全教育中的应用研究[J]. 教育进展, 2024, 14(12): 907-917. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2024.14122358

参考文献

[1] Sun, L. and Pan, C.E. (2021) Effects of the Application of Information Technology to E-Book Learning on Learning Motivation and Effectiveness. Frontiers in psychology, 12, Article 752303.
[2] Radović, S., Radojičić, M., Veljković, K. and Marić, M. (2018) Examining the Effects of Geogebra Applets on Mathematics Learning Using Interactive Mathematics Textbook. Interactive Learning Environments, 28, 32-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Sung, H., Hwang, G., Chen, C. and Liu, W. (2019) A Contextual Learning Model for Developing Interactive E-Books to Improve Students’ Performances of Learning the Analects of Confucius. Interactive Learning Environments, 30, 470-483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Furenes, M.I., Kucirkova, N. and Bus, A.G. (2021) A Comparison of Children’s Reading on Paper versus Screen: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 91, 483-517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Korat, O. and Shamir, A. (2012) Direct and Indirect Teaching: Using E-Books for Supporting Vocabulary, Word Reading, and Story Comprehension for Young Children. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46, 135-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Barnyak, N.C. and McNelly, T.A. (2015) The Literacy Skills and Motivation to Read of Children Enrolled in Title I: A Comparison of Electronic and Print Nonfiction Books. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44, 527-536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Alice Chen, M., Hwang, G., Majumdar, R., Toyokawa, Y. and Ogata, H. (2021) Research Trends in the Use of E-Books in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Education from 2011 to 2020: A Bibliometric and Content Analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 31, 2411-2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Stirling, A. and Birt, J. (2013) An Enriched Multimedia E-Book Application to Facilitate Learning of Anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 7, 19-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Tlili, A., Zhao, J., Yang, K., et al. (2024) Going beyond Books to Using E-Books in Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Studies. Interactive Learning Environments, 32, 2207-2231.
[10] Seel, N.M. (2011) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer Science & Business Media.
[11] Sikström, P., Valentini, C., Sivunen, A. and Kärkkäinen, T. (2022) How Pedagogical Agents Communicate with Students: A Two-Phase Systematic Review. Computers & Education, 188, Article ID: 104564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Lee, S., Wang, T., Hwang, G. and Chang, S. (2018) Effects of the Use of Interactive E‐books by Intensive Care Unit Patients’ Family Members: Anxiety, Learning Performances and Perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 888-901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Rockinson-Szapkiw, A.J., Courduff, J., Carter, K. and Bennett, D. (2013) Electronic versus Traditional Print Textbooks: A Comparison Study on the Influence of University Students’ Learning. Computers & Education, 63, 259-266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Tang, K. (2021) Paradigm Shifts in E-Book-Supported Learning: Evidence from the Web of Science Using a Co-Citation Network Analysis with an Education Focus (2010-2019). Computers & Education, 175, Article ID: 104323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Yohannes, A., Chen, H. and Chang, C. (2023) Effect of an Interactive E-Book on Middle School Students’ Mathematics Reading and Spatial Ability. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 1869-1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Lin, C. (2016) Learning English with Electronic Textbooks on Tablet Pcs. Interactive Learning Environments, 25, 1035-1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Sung, H., Hwang, G. and Yen, Y. (2015) Development of a Contextual Decision-Making Game for Improving Students’ Learning Performance in a Health Education Course. Computers & Education, 82, 179-190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Swanson, E., Austin, C.R., Stewart, A.A. and Scammacca, N. (2020) A Meta-Analysis Examining the Effect of E-Book Use on Literacy Outcomes for Students in Grades K-12. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36, 480-496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Shamir, A. and Shlafer, I. (2011) E-books Effectiveness in Promoting Phonological Awareness and Concept about Print: A Comparison between Children at Risk for Learning Disabilities and Typically Developing Kindergarteners. Computers & Education, 57, 1989-1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Kim, Y. and Baylor, A.L. (2015) Research-based Design of Pedagogical Agent Roles: A Review, Progress, and Recommendations. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 160-169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Winkler, R., Hobert, S., Salovaara, A., Söllner, M. and Leimeister, J.M. (2020) Sara, the Lecturer: Improving Learning in Online Education with a Scaffolding-Based Conversational Agent. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, 25-30 April 2020, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Lester, J.C., Converse, S.A., Kahler, S.E., Barlow, S.T., Stone, B.A. and Bhogal, R.S. (1997). The Persona Effect: Affective Impact of Animated Pedagogical Agents. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, 22-27 March 1997, 359-366.[CrossRef
[23] Unal-Colak, F. and Ozan, O. (2012) The Effects of Animated Agents on Students’ Achievement and Attitudes. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13, 96-111.
[24] WANG, F., LI, W., XIE, H. and LIU, H. (2017) Is Pedagogical Agent in Multimedia Learning Good for Learning? A Meta-analysis. Advances in Psychological Science, 25, 12-28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Davis, R.O., Vincent, J. and Wan, L. (2021) Does a Pedagogical Agent’s Gesture Frequency Assist Advanced Foreign Language Users with Learning Declarative Knowledge? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article No. 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Mayer, R.E. and DaPra, C.S. (2012) An Embodiment Effect in Computer-Based Learning with Animated Pedagogical Agents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 239-252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Jin, S.A. (2010) The Effects of Incorporating a Virtual Agent in a Computer-Aided Test Designed for Stress Management Education: The Mediating Role of Enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 443-451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Hwang, G.J. and Lai, C.L. (2017) Facilitating and Bridging Out-of-Class and in-Class Learning: An Interactive e-Book-Based Flipped Learning Approach for Math Courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20, 184-197.
[29] Shiban, Y., Schelhorn, I., Jobst, V., Hörnlein, A., Puppe, F., Pauli, P., et al. (2015) The Appearance Effect: Influences of Virtual Agent Features on Performance and Motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 5-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Nielen, T.M.J., Smith, G.G., Sikkema-de Jong, M.T., Drobisz, J., van Horne, B. and Bus, A.G. (2017) Digital Guidance for Susceptible Readers: Effects on Fifth Graders’ Reading Motivation and Incidental Vocabulary Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56, 48-73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Zhao, J., Hwang, G., Chang, S., Yang, Q. and Nokkaew, A. (2021) Effects of Gamified Interactive E-Books on Students’ Flipped Learning Performance, Motivation, and Meta-Cognition Tendency in a Mathematics Course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 3255-3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Lee, Y., Chen, P. and Cheng, S. (2023) Improve Learning Retention, Self-Efficacy, Learning Attitude and Problem-Solving Skills through E-Books Based on Sequential Multi-Level Prompting Strategies. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 3663-3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Bidarra, J., Figueiredo, M. and Natálio, C. (2015) Interactive Design and Gamification of eBooks for Mobile and Contextual Learning. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 9, 24-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Wang, L. and Chen, M. (2010) The Effects of Game Strategy and Preference‐matching on Flow Experience and Programming Performance in Game‐Based Learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47, 39-52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Chu, H., Hwang, G., Tsai, C. and Tseng, J.C.R. (2010) A Two-Tier Test Approach to Developing Location-Aware Mobile Learning Systems for Natural Science Courses. Computers & Education, 55, 1618-1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef