智能汽车交通事故的刑事归责研究
Research on Criminal Liability of Intelligent Vehicle Traffic Accidents
DOI: 10.12677/ds.2025.112074, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 黄 韬:西南民族大学法学院,四川 成都
关键词: 智能驾驶刑事责任主体因果关系Intelligent Driving Subject of Criminal Responsibility Causality
摘要: 智能汽车交通事故的刑事归责困境主要体现为交通肇事罪、过失致人死亡罪等罪名难以适用的问题。纵观智能汽车的发展历程,搭载不同级别智能驾驶系统的汽车在发生交通事故后普遍存在刑事责任主体认定困难、驾驶者注意义务模糊、因果关系复杂等问题。对此,需要在坚持刑法人类中心主义的基础上对前述问题进行深入分析,明确刑事责任承担主体、合理限制因果关系认定范围,为智能汽车的稳定发展提供完善的法律保障。
Abstract: The dilemma of criminal liability of intelligent vehicle traffic accidents is mainly reflected in the difficulty of applying the crime of traffic accident and the crime of negligent death. Throughout the development of intelligent vehicles, cars equipped with different levels of intelligent driving systems generally have problems such as difficulty in identifying the subject of criminal responsibility, ambiguity of the driver’s duty of care, and complex causal relationship after traffic accidents. In this regard, it is necessary to carry out an in-depth analysis of the above-mentioned issues on the basis of adhering to the human-centered doctrine of criminal law, clarify the subject of criminal responsibility, reasonably limit the scope of causality determination, and provide perfect legal protection for the stable development of intelligent vehicles.
文章引用:黄韬. 智能汽车交通事故的刑事归责研究[J]. 争议解决, 2025, 11(2): 274-279. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2025.112074

参考文献

[1] 张鸿涛, 徐连明, 刘臻. 物联网关键技术及系统应用[M]. 第2版. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2017: 236.
[2] 孙浩然. 论自动驾驶型汽车肇事逃逸的刑事归责[J]. 江西警察学院学报, 2024(8): 1-12.
[3] 张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 第6版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021: 396.
[4] 王钢. 人工智能刑事责任主体否定——基于规范与语义的考察[J]. 苏州大学学报(法学版): 2022(4): 63-79.
[5] 储陈城. 人工智能时代刑法的立场和功能[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2018(6): 77-94.