论《民法典》下专业管理人的报偿请求权
On the Right of Remuneration for Professional Managers under the Chinese Civil Code
摘要: 管理人是否应享有报酬请求权,核心在于管理人因无因管理所消耗的劳动力是否具有交换价值。站在维护本人利益的视角下,专业管理人之报偿请求权不损害甚至有利于本人利益,而且不会影响无因管理制度的防免功能。该规范的具体实现路径为对《民法典》第九百七十九条中“费用”表述的专门解释。报偿数额的确定应当符合当地水平与一般理性人的期待,而专业管理人的认定与对管理结果的认定也同样如此。
Abstract: The core issue of whether a manager should have the right to claim remuneration lies in whether the labor expended by the manager during negotiorum gestio possesses exchange value. From the perspective of safeguarding the interests of the principal, granting professional managers the right to claim remuneration does not harm but may even benefit the principal’s interests, and it does not undermine the preventive function of the negotiorum gestio system. The practical implementation of this norm can be achieved through a specialized interpretation of the term “expenses” in Article 979 of the Chinese Civil Code. The determination of the remuneration amount should align with local standards and the reasonable expectations of an average person, while the identification of professional managers and the assessment of management outcomes should follow the same principle.
文章引用:郭升坤. 论《民法典》下专业管理人的报偿请求权[J]. 争议解决, 2025, 11(3): 51-55. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2025.113092

参考文献

[1] 吴训祥. 论无因管理本人的偿还义务——兼论《民法总则》第183条第2句的适用问题[J]. 法学家, 2019(2): 84-96.
[2] 王利明. 债法总则[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2016: 178.
[3] 崔建远. 中国债法的现状与未来[J]. 法律科学(西北政法学院学报), 2013, 31(1): 135-141.
[4] 史尚宽. 债法总论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2000: 70.
[5] 胡康生, 主编. 中华人民共和国合同法释义[M]. 第3版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2013: 626.
[6] 蒋言. 无因管理报酬请求权之辨[J]. 南通大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 37(1): 107-113.