距下关节镜辅助对钉中钉治疗跟骨骨折临床效果的研究
A Study on the Clinical Effect of Subtalar Arthroscopic Assistance in the Treatment of Calcaneal Fractures with Nail-in-Nail Fixation
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.154999, PDF,   
作者: 袁卫龙*, 朱昊翔, 吕成昱#:青岛大学附属医院关节外科,山东 青岛;厉运收:莒县人民医院手足外科,山东 日照
关键词: 距下关节镜微创钉中钉跟骨骨折临床应用Subtalar Arthroscope Minimally Invasive Nail in Nail Calcaneal Fracture Clinical Application
摘要: 目的:探究应用距下关节镜辅助复位钉中钉内固定治疗跟骨骨折的临床效果。方法:将2022年12月至2024年1月在莒县人民医院进行跟骨骨折手术治疗符合纳入标准的患者,按手术日期分别依次选取30例单纯钉中钉治疗患者(对照组)及30例距下关节镜辅助复位钉中钉治疗患者(治疗组)。记录两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、围手术期切口情况、术后疼痛、住院时间及骨折愈合情况,术后影像学复查测量跟骨关节面平整度(关节面台阶CT ≥ 1 mm,X线 ≥ 2 mm)及关节腔整洁率(细小碎骨数 ≥ 1);术后3个月及6个月时应用AOFAS标准评定足部功能。结果:经过6~15个月(平均9.25个月)的随访,两组患者在术中出血量、围手术期切口情况、术后疼痛(VAS评分)、住院时间及骨折愈合等方面无显著差异;在手术时间上治疗组稍长;在关节面平整度、关节腔整洁率及术后6个月时根据AOFAS标准评定患足功能恢复情况上,治疗组均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:在钉中钉内固定治疗跟骨骨折上,距下关节镜辅助复位改良了跟骨骨折跗骨窦撬拨复位钉中钉内固定的方法,便于术中观察关节面复位固定情况及距下关节内部整洁程度,进行关节腔清理,提升了钉中钉对跟骨骨折的治疗效果。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the clinical effect of subtalar arthroscopic-assisted reduction and intramedullary nail internal fixation in the treatment of calcaneal fractures. Methods: From December 2022 to January 2024, among the patients with calcaneal fractures admitted to Ju County People’s Hospital who met the inclusion criteria, 30 patients treated with simple intramedullary nail fixation (control group) and 30 patients treated with subtalar arthroscopic-assisted reduction and intramedullary nail fixation (treatment group) were successively selected according to the operation time. We record the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, perioperative incision conditions, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, and fracture healing situation of the patients in both groups. After the operation, conduct imaging reexamination to measure the flatness of the calcaneal articular surface (the articular surface step is ≥1 mm on CT and ≥2 mm on X-ray) and the tidiness rate of the joint cavity (the number of fine broken bones is ≥1). We evaluate the foot function using the AOFAS standard at 3 months and 6 months after the operation. Results: After a follow-up period ranging from 6 to 15 months (with an average of 9.25 months), there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss, peri-operative incision conditions, postoperative pain (evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale, VAS score), length of hospital stay, and fracture healing. The operation time of the experimental group was slightly longer. There were statistical differences in the articular surface flatness and the cleanliness rate of the joint cavity (p < 0.05). Six months after the operation, the functional recovery of the affected foot was evaluated according to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) criteria. The treatment group showed better results than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of calcaneal fractures with intramedullary nail internal fixation, subtalar arthroscopic-assisted reduction improves the method of subtalar sinus pry reduction and intramedullary nail internal fixation for calcaneal fractures. It is convenient to observe the reduction and fixation condition of the articular surface and the tidiness degree of the inside of the subtalar joint during the operation, improves the treatment effect of the intramedullary nail, and has more advantages for the long-term functional recovery of the affected foot.
文章引用:袁卫龙, 厉运收, 朱昊翔, 吕成昱. 距下关节镜辅助对钉中钉治疗跟骨骨折临床效果的研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(4): 814-821. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.154999

参考文献

[1] Meena, S., Hooda, A., Sharma, P., et al. (2017) Operative versus Non Operative Treatment of Displaced Intraarticular Fracture of Calcaneum: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 83, 161-169.
[2] Hsu, A.R., Anderson, R.B. and Cohen, B.E. (2015) Advances in Surgical Management of Intra-Articular Calcaneus Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 23, 399-407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 吴彦昕, 朱家博, 遇博丰, 等. 跟骨关节内骨折的治疗及其并发症的研究进展[J]. 吉林医药学院学报, 2024, 45(6): 444-448.
[4] 畅宁, 徐静磊, 徐晨阳, 等. 微创三窗切口新型解剖锁定钢板治疗跟骨骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2021, 23(10): 871-876.
[5] 陆恩武, 郑满红, 杨再丰, 等. 改良微创切口内固定治疗跟骨骨折的疗效[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2022, 25(1): 124-127.
[6] 吴跃虎, 孔晓茜. 外踝下微创切口与传统切口入路治疗跟骨骨折切口愈合的疗效比较[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2022, 50(2): 207-211.
[7] 王建锋, 钱建军. 跗骨窦微创切口与外侧L形切口治疗跟骨关节内骨折的疗效研究[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2022, 27(1): 50-51.
[8] 马昕, 施忠民, 陈亦轩. 跟骨骨折微创手术治疗进展及展望[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2024, 17(4): 289-293.
[9] 舒景坤, 李红, 赵连伟, 等. 钉中钉内固定系统治疗跟骨骨折[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2022, 25(4): 594.
[10] 胡晓伟, 孙开强, 厉运收, 等. 跗骨窦撬拨复位经皮钉中钉内固定微创治疗跟骨骨折[J]. 实用手外科杂志, 2023, 37(1): 76-79.
[11] 孙茂庚, 孙军. 关节镜辅助下微创钉中钉内固定治疗跟骨骨折的临床疗效[J]. 生物骨科材料与临床研究, 2024, 21(4): 21-24.
[12] 梁就积, 甘艺荣, 陈有弟, 等. 关节镜联合跟骨钉中钉系统与跗骨窦小切口内固定治疗Sanders II、III型跟骨骨折的疗效比较[J]. 转化医学杂志, 2024, 13(7): 1080-1084.
[13] 白晶, 聂姗姗, 王骁汉, 等. 跟骨骨折L形入路术后切口愈合不良的相关因素分析[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2021, 29(5): 21-24, 28.
[14] 丁凯, 凌为其, 谈春业, 等. 距下关节镜辅助下经皮撬拨复位螺钉固定与切开复位内固定治疗Sanders II、III型跟骨骨折的对比研究[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2021, 21(6): 508-512.
[15] 马超, 王成伟, 唐国柱. 微创技术与开放手术治疗Sanders II、III型跟骨骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2020, 40(21): 1443-1452.
[16] Eichinger, M., Brunner, A., Stofferin, H., Bölderl, A., Blauth, M. and Schmölz, W. (2018) Screw Tip Augmentation Leads to Improved Primary Stability in the Minimally Invasive Treatment of Displaced Intra-Articular Fractures of the Calcaneus: A Biomechanical Study. International Orthopaedics, 43, 2175-2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] 郭宗慧, 颜勇卿, 唐寅, 等. SandersⅡ型跟骨骨折螺钉微创治疗的有限元优化分析[J]. 中国骨伤, 2021, 34(2): 137-142.
[18] 马国涛, 杨朝垒, 田朝奇, 等. 距下关节镜辅助在Sanders II、III型跟骨骨折微创治疗中的应用价值分析[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2021, 23(9): 687-690, 696.
[19] 吴佳俊, 沈超, 周小小, 等. 距下关节镜辅助下经跗骨窦入路治疗Sanders II型跟骨骨折[J]. 骨科, 2022, 13(5): 409-413.
[20] 王加利, 赵春霞, 陈仲华, 等. 距下关节镜下联合辅助器械精准微创治疗Sanders II、III型跟骨骨折[J]. 实用手外科杂志, 2023, 37(2): 181-185, 196.
[21] 马龙, 刘波, 吴刚强, 等. 跟骨“钉中钉”内固定系统治疗Sanders II、III型跟骨骨折[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2023, 38(12): 1317-1319.